BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the proper method for the normalization of spinal cord volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A group of 34 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients (28 relapsing and 6 progressive) and 15 healthy controls had whole spinal cord 3-mm thick T2-weighted axial fast spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images obtained at 3T. For each participant, four volumes were measured (C2-3 volume, cervical cord volume, thoracic cord volume, and whole cord volume). The volumes were normalized by the number of slices and three potential measures of body size (intracranial volume [ICV], body mass index, and body surface area) using the proportional method. RESULTS: All raw volumes and volumes normalized by number of slices or ICV were significantly lower in progressive MS patients compared to relapsing MS patients/healthy controls (P < .05). In addition, C2-3 volume and cervical cord volume were significantly correlated with Expanded Disability Status Scale score (P < .05). All regional volumes showed high intercorrelation, and normalization by the number of slices significantly increased some correlations. Regarding reliability, whole cord volume regardless of normalization technique had lower coefficient of variation than C2-3 volume. CONCLUSIONS: Since normalization factor had limited impact on reliability and the ability to detect differences, normalization by the number of slices is recommended.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the proper method for the normalization of spinal cord volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A group of 34 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients (28 relapsing and 6 progressive) and 15 healthy controls had whole spinal cord 3-mm thick T2-weighted axial fast spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images obtained at 3T. For each participant, four volumes were measured (C2-3 volume, cervical cord volume, thoracic cord volume, and whole cord volume). The volumes were normalized by the number of slices and three potential measures of body size (intracranial volume [ICV], body mass index, and body surface area) using the proportional method. RESULTS: All raw volumes and volumes normalized by number of slices or ICV were significantly lower in progressive MSpatients compared to relapsing MSpatients/healthy controls (P < .05). In addition, C2-3 volume and cervical cord volume were significantly correlated with Expanded Disability Status Scale score (P < .05). All regional volumes showed high intercorrelation, and normalization by the number of slices significantly increased some correlations. Regarding reliability, whole cord volume regardless of normalization technique had lower coefficient of variation than C2-3 volume. CONCLUSIONS: Since normalization factor had limited impact on reliability and the ability to detect differences, normalization by the number of slices is recommended.
Authors: J M Stankiewicz; M Neema; D C Alsop; B C Healy; A Arora; G J Buckle; T Chitnis; C R G Guttmann; D Hackney; R Bakshi Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Mark A Horsfield; Stefania Sala; Mohit Neema; Martina Absinta; Anshika Bakshi; Maria Pia Sormani; Maria A Rocca; Rohit Bakshi; Massimo Filippi Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-01-07 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: R Zivadinov; A C Banas; V Yella; N Abdelrahman; B Weinstock-Guttman; M G Dwyer Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-11-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Chris H Polman; Stephen C Reingold; Gilles Edan; Massimo Filippi; Hans-Peter Hartung; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D Lublin; Luanne M Metz; Henry F McFarland; Paul W O'Connor; Magnhild Sandberg-Wollheim; Alan J Thompson; Brian G Weinshenker; Jerry S Wolinsky Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Christopher P Gilmore; Gabriele C DeLuca; Lars Bö; Trudy Owens; James Lowe; Margaret M Esiri; Nikos Evangelou Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2005-12
Authors: Christina Engl; Paul Schmidt; Milan Arsic; Christine C Boucard; Viola Biberacher; Michael Röttinger; Thorleif Etgen; Sabine Nunnemann; Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Maximilian Reiser; Eva M Meisenzahl; Mark Mühlau Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Min Chen; Aaron Carass; Jiwon Oh; Govind Nair; Dzung L Pham; Daniel S Reich; Jerry L Prince Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Lindsay S Cahill; Monan Angela Zhang; Valeria Ramaglia; Heather Whetstone; Melika Pahlevan Sabbagh; Tae Joon Yi; Laura Woo; Thomas S Przybycien; Marina Moshkova; Fei Linda Zhao; Olga L Rojas; Josephine Gomes; Stefanie Kuerten; Jennifer L Gommerman; John G Sled; Shannon E Dunn Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nico Papinutto; Carlo Asteggiano; Antje Bischof; Tristan J Gundel; Eduardo Caverzasi; William A Stern; Stefano Bastianello; Stephen L Hauser; Roland G Henry Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Keren Regev; Brian C Healy; Fariha Khalid; Anu Paul; Renxin Chu; Shahamat Tauhid; Subhash Tummala; Camilo Diaz-Cruz; Radhika Raheja; Maria A Mazzola; Felipe von Glehn; Pia Kivisakk; Sheena L Dupuy; Gloria Kim; Tanuja Chitnis; Howard L Weiner; Roopali Gandhi; Rohit Bakshi Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Jiwon Oh; Michaela Seigo; Shiv Saidha; Elias Sotirchos; Kathy Zackowski; Min Chen; Jerry Prince; Marie Diener-West; Peter A Calabresi; Daniel S Reich Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 2.486