Literature DB >> 19369605

Normal findings on brain fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR images at 3T.

M Neema1, Z D Guss, J M Stankiewicz, A Arora, B C Healy, R Bakshi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MR imaging of the brain has become a routine tool for assessing lesions in patients with suspected neurologic disorders. There is growing interest in 3T brain FLAIR MR imaging but little normative data are available. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency and topography of cerebral hyperintensities seen with FLAIR MR imaging of the brain at 3T in a normal population and compare those findings to 1.5T.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Whole-brain 2D FLAIR MR imaging was performed in 22 healthy controls (mean age, 44 +/- 8 years; range, 30-53 years) at 3T. Fifteen of these subjects also underwent 2D FLAIR at 1.5T, with similar optimized parameters and voxel size. Cerebral hyperintense areas, including discrete foci, anterior and posterior periventricular capping, diffuse parenchymal hyperintensity, septal hyperintensity, corticospinal tract hyperintensity, and CSF flow artifacts were assessed. The Spearman rank test assessed the correlation between discrete hyperintense foci and age. The Wilcoxon signed rank test compared foci detectability at 3T versus 1.5T.
RESULTS: FLAIR at 3T commonly showed hyperintensities such as discrete foci (mean, 10.68 per subject; at least 1 present in 68% of subjects), anterior and posterior periventricular capping, diffuse posterior white matter hyperintensity, septal hyperintensity, corticospinal tract hyperintensity, and ventricular CSF flow artifacts. FLAIR at 3T showed a higher hyperintense foci volume (170 +/- 243 versus 93 +/- 152 mm3, P < .01) and number (9.4 +/- 13 versus 5.5 +/- 9.2, P < .01) than at 1.5T. No significant differences (P = .68) in the length/diameter of individual discrete hyperintense foci were seen between 3T and 1.5T. Discrete foci volume (r = 0.72 at 3T, r = 0.70 at 1.5T) and number (r = 0.74 at 3T; r = 0.69 at 1.5T) correlated with age to a similar degree on both platforms. All discrete foci were confined to the noncallosal supratentorial white matter. The other nonfocal hyperintensities (anterior and posterior periventricular capping, diffuse parenchymal hyperintensity, septal hyperintensity, corticospinal tract hyperintensity, and CSF flow artifacts) were generally more common and prominent at 3T than at 1.5T.
CONCLUSIONS: Discrete and diffuse parenchymal brain white matter FLAIR hyperintensities are more common and prominent at 3T than at 1.5T in healthy volunteers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19369605      PMCID: PMC3003332          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  20 in total

1.  Intraventricular CSF pulsation artifact on fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR images: analysis of 100 consecutive normal studies.

Authors:  R Bakshi; S D Caruthers; V Janardhan; M Wasay
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Comparison of flow artifacts between 2D-FLAIR and 3D-FLAIR sequences at 3 T.

Authors:  Shinji Naganawa; Tokiko Koshikawa; Tatsuya Nakamura; Hisashi Kawai; Hiroshi Fukatsu; Takeo Ishigaki; Tomomi Komada; Katsuya Maruyama; Osamu Takizawa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Neuropathologic correlates of white matter hyperintensities.

Authors:  Vanessa G Young; Glenda M Halliday; Jillian J Kril
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Fast FLAIR of the brain: the range of appearances in normal subjects and its application to quantification of white-matter disease.

Authors:  M L Gawne-Cain; N C Silver; I F Moseley; D H Miller
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  MRI of normal brain maturation.

Authors:  B A Holland; D K Haas; D Norman; M Brant-Zawadzki; T H Newton
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Foci of MRI signal (pseudo lesions) anterior to the frontal horns: histologic correlations of a normal finding.

Authors:  G Sze; S J De Armond; M Brant-Zawadzki; R L Davis; D Norman; T H Newton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  The prevalence and severity of white matter lesions, their relationship with age, ethnicity, gender, and cardiovascular disease risk factors: the ARIC Study.

Authors:  D Liao; L Cooper; J Cai; J Toole; N Bryan; G Burke; E Shahar; J Nieto; T Mosley; G Heiss
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Imaging of the spinal cord and brain in multiple sclerosis: a comparative study between fast FLAIR and fast spin echo.

Authors:  V L Stevenson; M L Gawne-Cain; G J Barker; A J Thompson; D H Miller
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  White-matter lesions in MR imaging of clinically healthy brains of elderly subjects: possible pathologic basis.

Authors:  J B Kirkpatrick; L A Hayman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Comparison of multiple sclerosis lesions at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Nancy L Sicotte; Rhonda R Voskuhl; Seth Bouvier; Rochelle Klutch; Mark S Cohen; John C Mazziotta
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  24 in total

1.  Comparison of 3D FLAIR, 2D FLAIR, and 2D T2-weighted MR imaging of brain stem anatomy.

Authors:  M Kitajima; T Hirai; Y Shigematsu; H Uetani; K Iwashita; K Morita; M Komi; Y Yamashita
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Current and Emerging Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis: Implications for the Radiologist, Part 1-Mechanisms, Efficacy, and Safety.

Authors:  C McNamara; G Sugrue; B Murray; P J MacMahon
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis: Impact of the 2017 McDonald criteria on clinical practice.

Authors:  Andrew J Solomon; Robert T Naismith; Anne H Cross
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Assessment of White Matter Integrity after Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Kacie L Wright; Ramona O Hopkins; Frank E Robertson; Erin D Bigler; H Gerry Taylor; Kenneth H Rubin; Kathryn Vannatta; Terry Stancin; Keith Owen Yeates
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Approaches to normalization of spinal cord volume: application to multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Brian C Healy; Ashish Arora; Douglas L Hayden; Antonia Ceccarelli; Shahamat S Tauhid; Mohit Neema; Rohit Bakshi
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Intra-rater variability in low-grade glioma segmentation.

Authors:  Hans Kristian Bø; Ole Solheim; Asgeir Store Jakola; Kjell-Arne Kvistad; Ingerid Reinertsen; Erik Magnus Berntsen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Differentiating neuromyelitis optica from other causes of longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis on spinal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yeliz Pekcevik; Charles H Mitchell; Maureen A Mealy; Gunes Orman; In H Lee; Scott D Newsome; Carol B Thompson; Carlos A Pardo; Peter A Calabresi; Michael Levy; Izlem Izbudak
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 6.312

8.  Corpus callosum atrophy correlates with gray matter atrophy in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Eric C Klawiter; Antonia Ceccarelli; Ashish Arora; Jonathan Jackson; Sonya Bakshi; Gloria Kim; Jennifer Miller; Shahamat Tauhid; Christian von Gizycki; Rohit Bakshi; Mohit Neema
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Brain MRI lesion load at 1.5T and 3T versus clinical status in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  James M Stankiewicz; Bonnie I Glanz; Brian C Healy; Ashish Arora; Mohit Neema; Ralph H B Benedict; Zachary D Guss; Shahamat Tauhid; Guy J Buckle; Maria K Houtchens; Samia J Khoury; Howard L Weiner; Charles R G Guttmann; Rohit Bakshi
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging of the normal brain: comparisons between under the conditions of 3.0 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Chul-Ho Sohn; Robert J Sevick; Richard Frayne; Hyuk-Won Chang; Sang-Pyo Kim; Dae-Kwang Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.