BACKGROUND: Multi-source feedback (MSF) aims to raise self-awareness of performance and encourage improvement. The ECO model (emotions, content, outcome) is a three-step process developed from the counselling literature to facilitate feedback acceptance and use in MSF. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to explore the acceptability, usefulness and educational impact of the model. METHODS: This was a qualitative study using interviews to explore general practice (GP) trainer and trainee experiences and perceptions of the ECO facilitation model. Interviews were conducted by telephone, recorded, transcribed and analysed using a thematic framework. RESULTS: About 13 GP trainers and trainees participated in the interviews following their MSF discussions using the ECO model. They agreed that the model was useful, simple to use and engaged trainees in reflection upon their feedback and performance. Exploring emotions and clarifying content appeared integral to accepting and using the feedback. Positive feedback was often surprising. Most trainees reported performance improvements following their MSF-ECO session. CONCLUSIONS: The model appeared acceptable and simple to use. Engaging the learner as a partner in the feedback discussion appeared effective. Further research is needed to fully understand the influence of each step in facilitating MSF acceptance and use, and to determine the impact of the ECO model alone upon performance outcomes compared to more traditional provision of MSF feedback.
BACKGROUND: Multi-source feedback (MSF) aims to raise self-awareness of performance and encourage improvement. The ECO model (emotions, content, outcome) is a three-step process developed from the counselling literature to facilitate feedback acceptance and use in MSF. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to explore the acceptability, usefulness and educational impact of the model. METHODS: This was a qualitative study using interviews to explore general practice (GP) trainer and trainee experiences and perceptions of the ECO facilitation model. Interviews were conducted by telephone, recorded, transcribed and analysed using a thematic framework. RESULTS: About 13 GP trainers and trainees participated in the interviews following their MSF discussions using the ECO model. They agreed that the model was useful, simple to use and engaged trainees in reflection upon their feedback and performance. Exploring emotions and clarifying content appeared integral to accepting and using the feedback. Positive feedback was often surprising. Most trainees reported performance improvements following their MSF-ECO session. CONCLUSIONS: The model appeared acceptable and simple to use. Engaging the learner as a partner in the feedback discussion appeared effective. Further research is needed to fully understand the influence of each step in facilitating MSF acceptance and use, and to determine the impact of the ECO model alone upon performance outcomes compared to more traditional provision of MSF feedback.
Authors: Benjamin C M Boerebach; Onyebuchi A Arah; Maas Jan Heineman; Olivier R C Busch; Kiki M J M H Lombarts Journal: World J Surg Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Thea van Roermund; Marie-Louise Schreurs; Henk Mokkink; Ben Bottema; Albert Scherpbier; Chris van Weel Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2013-07-16 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Christina E Johnson; Jennifer L Keating; David J Boud; Megan Dalton; Debra Kiegaldie; Margaret Hay; Barry McGrath; Wendy A McKenzie; Kichu Balakrishnan R Nair; Debra Nestel; Claire Palermo; Elizabeth K Molloy Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 2.463