Literature DB >> 24370148

Patient outcomes in canceled MRI-guided breast biopsies.

Bethany L Niell1, Janie M Lee, Christopher Johansen, Elkan F Halpern, Elizabeth A Rafferty.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The reported frequency of aborted MRI-guided breast biopsies ranges from 8% to 17%, usually secondary to nonvisualization at attempted biopsy. Our study examines the frequency of MRI-guided breast biopsies aborted because of lesion nonvisualization and the subsequent risk of malignancy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 350 patients and 445 lesions scheduled for MRI-guided biopsy between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2009. Medical records and imaging studies were reviewed to ascertain patient demographics, lesion and imaging characteristics, and subsequent pathology results. Chi-square statistics were calculated for patient level analyses.
RESULTS: MRI-guided biopsies were aborted in 13% (56/445) of lesions and 15% (53/350; 95% CI, 11.6-19.3%) of patients because of nonvisualization of the biopsy target at the time of attempted biopsy. Of these 53 patients, 50 patients had follow-up data available. Malignancy was subsequently diagnosed in five of those 50 patients (10%; 95% CI, 3.3-21.8%), three with invasive ductal carcinomas and two with ductal carcinoma in situ. The mean time to malignant diagnosis from the date of aborted biopsy was 2.6 months (range, 1.1-6.9 months).
CONCLUSION: Informed consent for MRI-guided breast biopsies should include discussion of biopsy cancellation because of nonvisualization of the target lesion. The low yet significant risk of malignancy in patients subsequent to an aborted MRI-guided breast biopsy warrants short-term follow-up MRI after a canceled biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24370148      PMCID: PMC3876032          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.10228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  14 in total

1.  Multicenter study for the evaluation of a dedicated biopsy device for MR-guided vacuum biopsy of the breast.

Authors:  C Perlet; A Heinig; X Prat; J Casselman; L Baath; H Sittek; C Stets; J Lamarque; I Anderson; P Schneider; P Taourel; M Reiser; S H Heywang-Köbrunner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-04-24       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Follow-up of breast lesions detected by MRI not biopsied due to absent enhancement of contrast medium.

Authors:  L Hefler; J Casselman; B Amaya; A Heinig; T Alberich; H Koelbl; S H Heywang-Köbrunner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-10-03       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  MRI follow-up after concordant, histologically benign diagnosis of breast lesions sampled by MRI-guided biopsy.

Authors:  Jie Li; D David Dershaw; Carol H Lee; Jennifer Kaplan; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency.

Authors:  C K Kuhl; H B Bieling; J Gieseke; B P Kreft; T Sommer; G Lutterbey; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Laura Liberman; Nanette Bracero; Elizabeth Morris; Cynthia Thornton; D David Dershaw
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Physiologic changes in breast magnetic resonance imaging during the menstrual cycle: perfusion imaging, signal enhancement, and influence of the T1 relaxation time of breast tissue.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Delille; Priscilla J Slanetz; Eren D Yeh; Daniel B Kopans; Leoncio Garrido
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Cancelation of MRI guided breast biopsies for suspicious breast lesions identified at 3.0 T MRI: reasons, rates, and outcomes.

Authors:  Karen S Johnson; Jay A Baker; Sheila S Lee; Mary Scott Soo
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US.

Authors:  Linda R LaTrenta; Jennifer H Menell; Elizabeth A Morris; Andrea F Abramson; D David Dershaw; Laura Liberman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Indeterminate or suspicious breast lesions detected initially with MR imaging: value of MRI-directed breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Cholatip Wiratkapun; Deirdre Duke; Amy S Nordmann; Panuwat Lertsithichai; Vamsidhar Narra; Premsri T Barton; Charles F Hildebolt; Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy.

Authors:  Boo-Kyung Han; Mitchell D Schnall; Susan G Orel; Mark Rosen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  3 in total

1.  Real-time virtual sonography examination and biopsy for suspicious breast lesions identified on MRI alone.

Authors:  Takayoshi Uematsu; Kaoru Takahashi; Seiichiro Nishimura; Junichiro Watanabe; Seiji Yamasaki; Takashi Sugino; Takuma Oishi; Yuko Kakuda; Mutsu Sato; Tomomi Hayashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  MRI-guided Breast Biopsy Case-based Review: Essential Techniques and Approaches to Challenging Cases.

Authors:  Beatriz E Adrada; Mary S Guirguis; Tuan Hoang; David A Spak; Gaiane M Rauch; Tanya W Moseley
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Clinical Application and Feasibility of MRI-Guided Breast Biopsy of Breast Minimal Lesions in Chinese Population.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Ying Song; Jiaqi Liu; Xiangzhi Meng; Zeyu Xing; Menglu Zhang; Feng Ye; Xin Wang; Xiang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.