Literature DB >> 21852450

Mutual interference between statistical summary perception and statistical learning.

Jiaying Zhao1, Nhi Ngo, Ryan McKendrick, Nicholas B Turk-Browne.   

Abstract

The visual system is an efficient statistician, extracting statistical summaries over sets of objects (statistical summary perception) and statistical regularities among individual objects (statistical learning). Although these two kinds of statistical processing have been studied extensively in isolation, their relationship is not yet understood. We first examined how statistical summary perception influences statistical learning by manipulating the task that participants performed over sets of objects containing statistical regularities (Experiment 1). Participants who performed a summary task showed no statistical learning of the regularities, whereas those who performed control tasks showed robust learning. We then examined how statistical learning influences statistical summary perception by manipulating whether the sets being summarized contained regularities (Experiment 2) and whether such regularities had already been learned (Experiment 3). The accuracy of summary judgments improved when regularities were removed and when learning had occurred in advance. In sum, calculating summary statistics impeded statistical learning, and extracting statistical regularities impeded statistical summary perception. This mutual interference suggests that statistical summary perception and statistical learning are fundamentally related.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21852450     DOI: 10.1177/0956797611419304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  14 in total

Review 1.  Combining fMRI and behavioral measures to examine the process of human learning.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Karuza; Lauren L Emberson; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Visual statistical learning is modulated by arbitrary and natural categories.

Authors:  Leeland L Rogers; Su Hyoun Park; Timothy J Vickery
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-31

Review 3.  What's statistical about learning? Insights from modelling statistical learning as a set of memory processes.

Authors:  Erik D Thiessen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Towards a theory of individual differences in statistical learning.

Authors:  Noam Siegelman; Louisa Bogaerts; Morten H Christiansen; Ram Frost
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Dissociable behavioural outcomes of visual statistical learning.

Authors:  Brett C Bays; Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-02-22

6.  Task specificity of attention training: the case of probability cuing.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow; Bo-Yeong Won; Julia D Cistera; Gail M Rosenbaum
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Learned states of preparatory attentional control.

Authors:  Anthony W Sali; Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Visual statistical learning is not reliably modulated by selective attention to isolated events.

Authors:  Elizabeth Musz; Matthew J Weber; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Attention is spontaneously biased toward regularities.

Authors:  Jiaying Zhao; Naseem Al-Aidroos; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-04-04

10.  Tasks determine what is learned in visual statistical learning.

Authors:  Timothy J Vickery; Su Hyoun Park; Jayesh Gupta; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.