Literature DB >> 23558552

Attention is spontaneously biased toward regularities.

Jiaying Zhao1, Naseem Al-Aidroos, Nicholas B Turk-Browne.   

Abstract

Knowledge about regularities in the environment can be used to facilitate perception, memory, and language acquisition. Given this usefulness, we hypothesized that statistically structured sources of information receive attentional priority over noisier sources, independent of their intrinsic salience or goal relevance. We report three experiments that support this hypothesis. Experiment 1 shows that regularities bias spatial attention: Visual search was facilitated at a location containing temporal regularities, even though these regularities did not predict target location, timing, or identity. Experiments 2 and 3 show that regularities bias feature attention: Attentional capture doubled in magnitude when singletons appeared, respectively, in a color or dimension with temporal regularities among task-irrelevant stimuli. Prioritization of the locations and features of regularities is not easily accounted for in the conventional dichotomy between stimulus-driven and goal-directed attention. This prioritization may in turn promote further statistical learning, helping the mind to acquire knowledge about stable aspects of the environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attentional capture; cognitive control; feature-based attention; spatial attention; statistical learning; visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23558552      PMCID: PMC3734864          DOI: 10.1177/0956797612460407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  41 in total

1.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control.

Authors:  J B Hopfinger; M H Buonocore; G R Mangun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Attention and performance.

Authors:  H Pashler; J C Johnston; E Ruthruff
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes.

Authors:  J Fiser; R N Aslin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

4.  Rapidly learned stimulus expectations alter perception of motion.

Authors:  Matthew Chalk; Aaron R Seitz; Peggy Seriès
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Implicit perceptual anticipation triggered by statistical learning.

Authors:  Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Brian J Scholl; Marcia K Johnson; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  How is spatial context learning integrated over signal versus noise? A primacy effect in contextual cueing.

Authors:  Justin A Jungé; Brian J Scholl; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2007

7.  Compression in visual working memory: using statistical regularities to form more efficient memory representations.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2009-11

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 9.  Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: a hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval.

Authors:  Elisa Ciaramelli; Cheryl L Grady; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Multidimensional visual statistical learning.

Authors:  Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Phillip J Isola; Brian J Scholl; Teresa A Treat
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  66 in total

Review 1.  Attention and prediction in human audition: a lesson from cognitive psychophysiology.

Authors:  Erich Schröger; Anna Marzecová; Iria SanMiguel
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Attention sharpens the distinction between expected and unexpected percepts in the visual brain.

Authors:  Jiefeng Jiang; Christopher Summerfield; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Visual statistical learning is modulated by arbitrary and natural categories.

Authors:  Leeland L Rogers; Su Hyoun Park; Timothy J Vickery
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-31

4.  Medial prefrontal cortex predicts internally driven strategy shifts.

Authors:  Nicolas W Schuck; Robert Gaschler; Dorit Wenke; Jakob Heinzle; Peter A Frensch; John-Dylan Haynes; Carlo Reverberi
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  From the structure of experience to concepts of structure: How the concept "cause" is attributed to objects and events.

Authors:  Anna Leshinskaya; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-04

6.  Dissociable behavioural outcomes of visual statistical learning.

Authors:  Brett C Bays; Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-02-22

7.  Hippocampal and Prefrontal Theta-Band Mechanisms Underpin Implicit Spatial Context Learning.

Authors:  Eelke Spaak; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Automatic guidance of attention during real-world visual search.

Authors:  Katharina N Seidl-Rathkopf; Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Not All Predictions Are Equal: "What" and "When" Predictions Modulate Activity in Auditory Cortex through Different Mechanisms.

Authors:  Ryszard Auksztulewicz; Caspar M Schwiedrzik; Thomas Thesen; Werner Doyle; Orrin Devinsky; Anna C Nobre; Charles E Schroeder; Karl J Friston; Lucia Melloni
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The nature of the language input affects brain activation during learning from a natural language.

Authors:  Elena Plante; Dianne Patterson; Rebecca Gómez; Kyle R Almryde; Milo G White; Arve E Asbjørnsen
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 1.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.