OBJECTIVE: To investigate the agreement between self-report and a public registry regarding the occurrence and duration of sickness absence (SA) in patients with sciatica. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Observational 2-year longitudinal study including 227 patients. Self-report SA data were obtained by postal questionnaires covering recall periods of 3, 6, and 12 months and compared with data from the Norwegian National Sickness Benefit Register. RESULTS: The percent agreement on the occurrence of SA between self-report and registry was above 85% for all three recall periods. The patients overestimated the duration of their SA by 2.4 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.7) weeks for the 3-month recall period. The 95% limits of agreement were generally wide, varying from -12.5 to 17.3 weeks for the 3-month recall period to -38.8 to 37.2 weeks for the 12-month period. For the 3-, 6-, and 12-month recall periods, 48.1%, 29.8%, and 27.3% of the patients reported an SA duration that differed by ≤1 week from that recorded in the registry. CONCLUSION: Mainly because of low precision, the agreement on the duration of SA was poor for all three recall periods. The agreement between self-report and registry regarding the occurrence of SA was good.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the agreement between self-report and a public registry regarding the occurrence and duration of sickness absence (SA) in patients with sciatica. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Observational 2-year longitudinal study including 227 patients. Self-report SA data were obtained by postal questionnaires covering recall periods of 3, 6, and 12 months and compared with data from the Norwegian National Sickness Benefit Register. RESULTS: The percent agreement on the occurrence of SA between self-report and registry was above 85% for all three recall periods. The patients overestimated the duration of their SA by 2.4 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.7) weeks for the 3-month recall period. The 95% limits of agreement were generally wide, varying from -12.5 to 17.3 weeks for the 3-month recall period to -38.8 to 37.2 weeks for the 12-month period. For the 3-, 6-, and 12-month recall periods, 48.1%, 29.8%, and 27.3% of the patients reported an SA duration that differed by ≤1 week from that recorded in the registry. CONCLUSION: Mainly because of low precision, the agreement on the duration of SA was poor for all three recall periods. The agreement between self-report and registry regarding the occurrence of SA was good.
Authors: Corné A M Roelen; Willem van Rhenen; Johan W Groothoff; Jac J L van der Klink; Ute Bültmann Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: C A M Roelen; M W Heymans; J W R Twisk; W van Rhenen; S Pallesen; B Bjorvatn; B E Moen; N Magerøy Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2014-03-25 Impact factor: 3.015