Literature DB >> 35866584

Occupational recovery of Dutch workers with low back pain.

I Brus1, E Speklé1,2, P P Kuijer1, M Hardenberg1, P Coenen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a world leading cause of disability and has substantial impact on individuals and society as a whole. The largest part of the societal burden of LBP is caused by indirect costs, including sick leave. AIMS: We aimed to describe occupational recovery and associated costs for workers consulting an occupational physician (OP) with LBP, and to determine to what extent this differs by diagnoses: non-specific favourable LBP, non-specific unfavourable LBP, lumbosacral radicular syndrome (LRS) and specific LBP.
METHODS: We analysed longitudinal dynamic cohort data from an occupational health service, representing ~1.2 million workers from various companies and sectors throughout the Netherlands. The OP registered data on sick leave and LBP diagnoses. A survival analysis was performed on sick leave duration to determine recovery and a linear regression analysis on cost per episode, adjusting for sex, age and working hours.
RESULTS: We analysed 5951 LBP episodes from 5472 workers who consulted an OP, with a median and mean duration sick leave of 95 and 151 days, respectively. The probability of not recovering was 82% at 30 days and 10% at 1 year. The mean cost per episode was €15 350. Specific LBP (€22 999; beta (95% confidence interval [CI]): 16 278 (13 325-19 165)) and LRS (€20 111; beta (95% CI): 13 589 (12 527-14 659)) had the longest and most costly episodes, compared to non-specific favourable LBP (€6745; reference group).
CONCLUSIONS: With LRS and non-specific unfavourable LBP accounting for over 83% of LBP-associated sick leave costs, the work-directed care of workers with these two diagnoses deserves increased attention.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35866584      PMCID: PMC9578671          DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqac067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)        ISSN: 0962-7480            Impact factor:   5.629


  23 in total

1.  Patterns of sick-leave and health outcomes in injured workers with back pain.

Authors:  Pierre Côté; Marjorie L Baldwin; William G Johnson; John W Frank; Richard J Butler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Poor agreement found between self-report and a public registry on duration of sickness absence.

Authors:  Lars Grøvle; Anne J Haugen; Anne Keller; Bård Natvig; Jens I Brox; Margreth Grotle
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention.

Authors:  Jan Hartvigsen; Mark J Hancock; Alice Kongsted; Quinette Louw; Manuela L Ferreira; Stéphane Genevay; Damian Hoy; Jaro Karppinen; Glenn Pransky; Joachim Sieper; Rob J Smeets; Martin Underwood
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Correspondence of back pain patients' self-reports of sick leave and Swedish National Insurance Authority register.

Authors:  Steven J Linton
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2011-02

5.  Determining the Costs of Low-Back Pain Associated Sick Leave in the Dutch Workforce in the Period 2015 to 2017.

Authors:  Cas van der Wurf; Erwin Speklé; Frederieke Schaafsma; Pieter Coenen
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.162

6.  Costs of back pain in Germany.

Authors:  Christina M Wenig; Carsten O Schmidt; Thomas Kohlmann; Bernd Schweikert
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.931

7.  Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Risk Factors Associated With Transition From Acute to Chronic Low Back Pain in US Patients Seeking Primary Care.

Authors:  Joel M Stevans; Anthony Delitto; Samannaaz S Khoja; Charity G Patterson; Clair N Smith; Michael J Schneider; Janet K Freburger; Carol M Greco; Jennifer A Freel; Gwendolyn A Sowa; Ajay D Wasan; Gerard P Brennan; Stephen J Hunter; Kate I Minick; Stephen T Wegener; Patti L Ephraim; Michael Friedman; Jason M Beneciuk; Steven Z George; Robert B Saper
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-02-01

Review 9.  Absence from work and return to work in people with back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gwenllian Wynne-Jones; Jemma Cowen; Joanne L Jordan; Olalekan Uthman; Chris J Main; Nick Glozier; Danielle van der Windt
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 10.  The Dutch Multidisciplinary Occupational Health Guideline to Enhance Work Participation Among Low Back Pain and Lumbosacral Radicular Syndrome Patients.

Authors:  J W H Luites; P P F M Kuijer; C T J Hulshof; R Kok; M W Langendam; T Oosterhuis; J R Anema; V P Lapré-Utama; C P J Everaert; H Wind; R J E M Smeets; Y van Zaanen; E A Hoebink; L Voogt; W de Hoop; D H Boerman; J L Hoving
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.