Tejas Sheth1, Oscar Mena Miranda2, Beverly Johnson3. 1. Bone and Joint Institute, Hartford Hospital, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA. 2. Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA. 3. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1400 Pelham Parkway South, Jacobi Medical Center, Building 1, #3N-06, Rheumatology Division, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA. Beverly.johnson@nychhc.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The use of ultrasound (US) guidance for the injection and aspiration of joints has improved accuracy. The aim of this study was to determine if differences exist in the level of patient satisfaction, functionality, and the quality of life in adult patients receivingUS-guided (USG) versus landmark-guided (LMG) knee procedures. METHODS: This prospective, randomized study enrolled 41 patients undergoing knee procedures to USG or LMG groups. visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), and patient satisfaction score on a 5-point Likert scale were measured pre-procedure, immediate (< 30 min) and late (4-6 weeks) post-procedure. RESULTS:Thirty-seven patients were included in the final analysis after exclusion of 4 dropouts (18 in LMG arm, 19 in USG arm). Compared with LMG group, patients in the USG group had significantly better improvement in pain immediately (VAS 1.63 ± 1.6 (95% CI 0.91, 2.35) vs 4.05 ± 2.5 (95% CI 2.90, 4.62), p = 0.001) and later post-procedure (VAS 2.68 ± 2.0 (95% CI 1.78, 3.58) vs 6.38 ± 3.8 (95% CI 4.62, 8.14) p = 0.004) and satisfaction scores immediately (4.89 ± 0.3 (95% CI 4.76, 5.02) vs 4.11 ± 1.0 (95% CI 3.65, 4.57), p = 0.002) as well as delayed post-procedure (4.52 ± 0.9 (95% CI 4.12, 4.92) vs 3.38 ± 1.6 (95% CI 2.64, 4.12), p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: USG knee procedures were associated with higher patient satisfaction, both immediately after the procedure and after 4-6 weeks compared with LMG knee procedures. Key Points •This prospective study is the first one to look at patient satisfaction as an outcome measure after intra-articular steroids knee injections. •USG (US-guided) knee procedures were associated with higher patient satisfaction compared with LMG (landmark-guided) knee procedures. •USG knee procedures resulted in greater improvement in symptoms, pain, and quality of life scales after 4-6 weeks compared with LMG knee procedures.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The use of ultrasound (US) guidance for the injection and aspiration of joints has improved accuracy. The aim of this study was to determine if differences exist in the level of patient satisfaction, functionality, and the quality of life in adult patients receiving US-guided (USG) versus landmark-guided (LMG) knee procedures. METHODS: This prospective, randomized study enrolled 41 patients undergoing knee procedures to USG or LMG groups. visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), and patient satisfaction score on a 5-point Likert scale were measured pre-procedure, immediate (< 30 min) and late (4-6 weeks) post-procedure. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were included in the final analysis after exclusion of 4 dropouts (18 in LMG arm, 19 in USG arm). Compared with LMG group, patients in the USG group had significantly better improvement in pain immediately (VAS 1.63 ± 1.6 (95% CI 0.91, 2.35) vs 4.05 ± 2.5 (95% CI 2.90, 4.62), p = 0.001) and later post-procedure (VAS 2.68 ± 2.0 (95% CI 1.78, 3.58) vs 6.38 ± 3.8 (95% CI 4.62, 8.14) p = 0.004) and satisfaction scores immediately (4.89 ± 0.3 (95% CI 4.76, 5.02) vs 4.11 ± 1.0 (95% CI 3.65, 4.57), p = 0.002) as well as delayed post-procedure (4.52 ± 0.9 (95% CI 4.12, 4.92) vs 3.38 ± 1.6 (95% CI 2.64, 4.12), p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: USG knee procedures were associated with higher patient satisfaction, both immediately after the procedure and after 4-6 weeks compared with LMG knee procedures. Key Points •This prospective study is the first one to look at patient satisfaction as an outcome measure after intra-articular steroids knee injections. •USG (US-guided) knee procedures were associated with higher patient satisfaction compared with LMG (landmark-guided) knee procedures. •USG knee procedures resulted in greater improvement in symptoms, pain, and quality of life scales after 4-6 weeks compared with LMG knee procedures.
Authors: Uyen-Sa D T Nguyen; Yuqing Zhang; Yanyan Zhu; Jingbo Niu; Bin Zhang; David T Felson Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: W L Sibbitt; L G Kettwich; P A Band; N R Chavez-Chiang; S L DeLea; L J Haseler; A D Bankhurst Journal: Scand J Rheumatol Date: 2011-11-21 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: M Sabeti-Aschraf; A Ochsner; C Schueller-Weidekamm; M Schmidt; Ph T Funovics; G V Skrbensky; A Goll; K D Schatz Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2009-08-03 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Joanna Cunnington; Nicola Marshall; Geoff Hide; Claire Bracewell; John Isaacs; Philip Platt; David Kane Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2010-07
Authors: Seong Ho Jang; Sang Chul Lee; Ji Hae Lee; Sang Hyun Nam; Kyoung Rai Cho; Yongbum Park Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Philipp Bosch; Francesco Carubbi; Carlo Alberto Scirè; Xenofon Baraliakos; Louise Falzon; Christian Dejaco; Pedro M Machado Journal: RMD Open Date: 2021-11
Authors: Adham Aboul Fotouh; Mona Hamdy; Fatma Ali; Eman F Mohamed; Abdallah Allam; Waleed A Hassan; Ahmed Elsaman; Amany El-Najjar; Marwa A Amer; Doaa Mosad; Samar Tharwat; Samah A El Bakry; Hanan Saleh; Ahmed Zaghloul; Mostafa Mahmoud; Reem H A Mohammed; Hanan El-Saadany; Hanan M Fathi; Nevin Hammam; Hala A Raafat; Ashraf N Moharram; Tamer A Gheita Journal: Open Access Rheumatol Date: 2022-04-11