Literature DB >> 19003865

Peptide separation with immobilized pI strips is an attractive alternative to in-gel protein digestion for proteome analysis.

Nina C Hubner1, Shubin Ren, Matthias Mann.   

Abstract

Complex protein mixtures have traditionally been separated by 2-DE. Görg introduced IPGs as the first dimension of protein separation. In recent years, MS-based proteomics has increasingly become the method of choice for identifying and quantifying large number of proteins. In that technology, to decrease analyte complexity, proteins are often separated by 1-D SDS-gel electrophoresis before online MS analysis. Here, we investigate a recently introduced device for peptide separation with IPGs (Agilent OFFGEL). Loading capacity for optimal peptide focusing is below 100 microg and--similar to 2-D gels--IEF is more efficient in the acidic than the basic pH region. The 24-well fractionation format resulted in about 40% additional peptide identifications but less than 20% additional protein identifications than the 12-well format. Compared to in-gel digestion, peptide IEF consistently identified a third more proteins with equal number of fractions. Low protein starting amounts (10 microg) still resulted in deep proteome coverage. Advantages of the in-gel format include better reliability and robustness. Considering its superior performance, diminished sample and work-up requirements, peptide IEF will become a method of choice for sample preparation in proteomics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19003865     DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200800351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  54 in total

1.  Combining isoelectric point-based fractionation, liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry to improve peptide detection and protein identification.

Authors:  Stephanie M Cologna; William K Russell; Peniel J Lim; Gyula Vigh; David H Russell
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 2.  Proteomics: a pragmatic perspective.

Authors:  Parag Mallick; Bernhard Kuster
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Expanding the dipeptidyl peptidase 4-regulated peptidome via an optimized peptidomics platform.

Authors:  Arthur D Tinoco; Debarati M Tagore; Alan Saghatelian
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Systematic comparison of fractionation methods for in-depth analysis of plasma proteomes.

Authors:  Zhijun Cao; Hsin-Yao Tang; Huan Wang; Qin Liu; David W Speicher
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  A practical guide to the MaxQuant computational platform for SILAC-based quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Jürgen Cox; Ivan Matic; Maximiliane Hilger; Nagarjuna Nagaraj; Matthias Selbach; Jesper V Olsen; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis.

Authors:  Jacek R Wiśniewski; Alexandre Zougman; Nagarjuna Nagaraj; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Computational principles of determining and improving mass precision and accuracy for proteome measurements in an Orbitrap.

Authors:  Jürgen Cox; Matthias Mann
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Absolute proteome and phosphoproteome dynamics during the cell cycle of Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Fission Yeast).

Authors:  Alejandro Carpy; Karsten Krug; Sabine Graf; André Koch; Sasa Popic; Silke Hauf; Boris Macek
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Proteomic changes resulting from gene copy number variations in cancer cells.

Authors:  Tamar Geiger; Juergen Cox; Matthias Mann
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  A protein-centric approach for the identification of folate enzymes from the malarial parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, using OFFGEL™ solution-based isoelectric focussing and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Ronan D M O'Cualain; John E Hyde; Paul F G Sims
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 2.979

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.