Literature DB >> 21850516

An affective booster moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on behavioral intentions for colorectal cancer screening.

Rebecca A Ferrer1, William M P Klein, Laura E Zajac, Stephanie R Land, Bruce S Ling.   

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that loss-framed messages are more effective than gain-framed messages in motivating detection behaviors such as screening. The present study examined whether affective context moderates the degree to which message frame is associated with behavioral intentions to engage in colorectal cancer screening. In particular, we buttressed a framing manipulation with an "affective booster" to increase anticipated and anticipatory emotions associated with the framed messages. Consistent with previous research, we found that loss-framed messages are more effective in increasing intentions to screen. However, we found that among individuals who received gain-framed messages (but not loss-framed messages), the affective booster increased message persuasiveness. This effect on intentions was partially mediated by self-efficacy for engaging in screening. This study indicates that in the presence of emotional boosters, loss-framed messages may lose their advantage over gain-framed messages in motivating detection behaviors, and that self-efficacy may partially explain these effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21850516     DOI: 10.1007/s10865-011-9371-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  32 in total

1.  Risk as feelings.

Authors:  G F Loewenstein; E U Weber; C K Hsee; N Welch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Worry about health in smoking behaviour change.

Authors:  A Dijkstra; J Brosschot
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2003-09

3.  Does worry about breast cancer predict screening behaviors? A meta-analysis of the prospective evidence.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Kevin D McCaul; Renee E Magnan
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  The effectiveness of gain-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behavior: is all hope lost?

Authors:  Amy E Latimer; Peter Salovey; Alexander J Rothman
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2007 Oct-Nov

5.  Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model.

Authors:  I M Rosenstock; V J Strecher; M H Becker
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1988

6.  The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior.

Authors:  B E Meyerowitz; S Chaiken
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-03

7.  Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on use of screening mammography.

Authors:  Kristel M Gallagher; John A Updegraff; Alexander J Rothman; Linda Sims
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income, ethnic minority women.

Authors:  Anne Marie Apanovitch; Danielle McCarthy; Peter Salovey
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 9.  The multiple facets of cigarette addiction and what they mean for encouraging and helping smokers to stop.

Authors:  Robert West
Journal:  COPD       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.409

10.  Message framing for smoking cessation: the interaction of risk perceptions and gender.

Authors:  Benjamin A Toll; Peter Salovey; Stephanie S O'Malley; Carolyn M Mazure; Amy Latimer; Sherry A McKee
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.244

View more
  14 in total

1.  Effects of Fruit and Vegetable Feeding Messages on Mothers and Fathers: Interactions Between Emotional State and Health Message Framing.

Authors:  Susan Persky; Rebecca A Ferrer; William M P Klein; Megan R Goldring; Rachel W Cohen; William D Kistler; Haley E Yaremych; Sofia Bouhlal
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2019-08-16

2.  Message framing for health: moderation by perceived susceptibility and motivational orientation in a diverse sample of Americans.

Authors:  John A Updegraff; Cameron Brick; Amber S Emanuel; Roy E Mintzer; David K Sherman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Targeting and tailoring message-framing: the moderating effect of racial identity on receptivity to colorectal cancer screening among African-Americans.

Authors:  Todd Lucas; Mark Manning; Lenwood W Hayman; James Blessman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2018-06-07

4.  Developing a scale to assess health regulatory focus.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ferrer; Isaac M Lipkus; Jennifer L Cerully; Colleen M McBride; James A Shepperd; William M P Klein
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  The Effects of Personalizing Colorectal Cancer Risk Communication on Risk Perceptions and Health Behavior Intentions: a Randomized Trial of Average-Risk Adults.

Authors:  Carrie A Miller; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Maria D Thomson
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Affective science perspectives on cancer control: strategically crafting a mutually beneficial research agenda.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ferrer; Paige A Green; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-05

7.  Predicting Colorectal Cancer Screening among Adults Who Have Never Been Screened: Testing the Interaction between Message Framing and Tailored Risk Feedback.

Authors:  Isaac M Lipkus; Constance Johnson; Sathya Amarasekara; Wei Pan; John A Updegraff
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2019-04-08

8.  A Tale of Two Diverse Qualtrics Samples: Information for Online Survey Researchers.

Authors:  Carrie A Miller; Jeanine P D Guidry; Bassam Dahman; Maria D Thomson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Effects of culturally targeted message framing on colorectal cancer screening among African Americans.

Authors:  Todd Lucas; Hayley S Thompson; James Blessman; Anurag Dawadi; Caroline E Drolet; Kelly A Hirko; Louis A Penner
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.267

10.  Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ronan E O'Carroll; Julie A Chambers; Linda Brownlee; Gillian Libby; Robert J C Steele
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 4.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.