Literature DB >> 21849921

Angioplasty and stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis with nitinol stent: factors affecting technical success and patient safety.

Simon Chun Ho Yu1, Thomas Wai Hong Leung, Esther Hiu Yee Hung, Kwok Tung Lee, Lawrence Ka Sing Wong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Angioplasty and stenting using nitinol stents is a recognized treatment option for intracranial atherosclerosis.
OBJECTIVE: To identify procedure-related factors that may affect patient safety and technical outcome.
METHODS: In this prospective study of 57 consecutive patients, the primary end points were intraprocedural technical problems, periprocedure morbidity, and complications. Major periprocedure complication was defined as all stroke or death at 30 days. Technical failure was defined as the inability to complete the procedure because of technical or safety problems. Procedure failure was defined as a procedure outcome of technical failure or major periprocedure complication. Secondary end points were procedure-related factors that may affect patient safety and technical outcome.
RESULTS: Procedure failure rate was 12.3% (7/57) (major periprocedure complication rate, 5.3% [3/57]; technical failure rate, 7% [4/57]). Initial failure in tracking of balloon or stent occurred in 20 patients, other technical problems occurred in 11 patients, including kinking or trapping of balloon catheter (2 cases), difficulty in unsheathing of stent (3 cases), forward migration of stent during deployment (4 cases), trapping of nose cone after stent deployment (1 case), fracture of delivery system (2 cases), and guidewire fracture (1 case). Unfavorable vascular morphology signified by the presence of 2 or more reverse curves along the access path was found to associate with initial failure in the tracking of instruments (OR = ∞), and occurrence of other technical problems (OR = 25).
CONCLUSION: Procedure-related factors could be identified and lead to improvements in patient safety and technical outcome. Tortuous vascular morphology is a key factor to be overcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21849921     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182320bb0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  6 in total

1.  Fusion Image Guidance for Supra-Aortic Vessel Catheterization in Neurointerventions: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  A Feddal; S Escalard; F Delvoye; R Fahed; J P Desilles; K Zuber; H Redjem; J S Savatovsky; G Ciccio; S Smajda; M Ben Maacha; M Mazighi; M Piotin; R Blanc
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  The learning curve associated with intracranial angioplasty and stenting: analysis from a single center.

Authors:  Peiquan Zhou; Guang Zhang; Zhiyong Ji; Shancai Xu; Huaizhang Shi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-08

Review 3.  Role of stenting for intracranial atherosclerosis in the post-SAMMPRIS era.

Authors:  Dale Ding; Robert M Starke; R Webster Crowley; Kenneth C Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Safety and Efficacy Analyses of Angioplasty and Stenting for Severe Intracranial Arterial Stenosis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in China.

Authors:  Rong Yin; Fei Chang; Bo Hong; Xiang-Qun Shi; Guo-Zhen Zhang; Zhao Liu; Zhi-Qiang Zhang; Ya-Xuan Wei; Jian-Min Liu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-10-31

5.  Aortic and supra-aortic arterial tortuosity and access technique: Impact on time to device deployment in stroke thrombectomy.

Authors:  Joao Alves Rosa; Rachel Roberts; James Wareham; Robert Crossley; Anthony Cox; Alex Mortimer
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 1.764

6.  Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: Current Debates and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Jichang Luo; Tao Wang; Peng Gao; Timo Krings; Liqun Jiao
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.003

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.