Literature DB >> 32819903

Fusion Image Guidance for Supra-Aortic Vessel Catheterization in Neurointerventions: A Feasibility Study.

A Feddal1, S Escalard1, F Delvoye1, R Fahed1, J P Desilles1,2,3, K Zuber1, H Redjem1, J S Savatovsky4, G Ciccio1, S Smajda1, M Ben Maacha1, M Mazighi1,2,3, M Piotin1,2,3, R Blanc5,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Endovascular navigation through tortuous vessels can be complex. Tools that can optimise this access phase need to be developed. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of supra-aortic vessel catheterization guidance by means of live fluoroscopy fusion with MR angiography or CT angiography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients underwent preinterventional diagnostic MRA, and 8 patients underwent CTA. Fusion guidance was evaluated in 35 sessions of catheterization, targeting a total of 151 supra-aortic vessels. The time for MRA/CTA segmentation and fluoroscopy with MRA/CTA coregistration was recorded. The feasibility of fusion guidance was evaluated by recording the catheterizations executed by interventional neuroradiologists according to a standard technique under fluoroscopy and conventional road-mapping independent of the fusion guidance. Precision of the fusion roadmap was evaluated by measuring (on a semiquantitative 3-point scale) the maximum offset between the position of the guidewires/catheters and the vasculature on the virtual CTA/MRA images. The targeted vessels were divided in 2 groups according to their position from the level of the aortic arch.
RESULTS: The average time needed for segmentation and image coregistration was 7 ± 2 minutes. The MRA/CTA virtual roadmap overlaid on live fluoroscopy was considered accurate in 84.8% (128/151) of the assessed landmarks, with a higher accuracy for the group of vessels closer to the aortic arch (92.4%; OR, 4.88; 95% CI, 1.83-11.66; P = .003).
CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopy with MRA/CTA fusion guidance for supra-aortic vessel interventions is feasible. Further improvements of the technique to increase accuracy at the cervical level and further studies are needed for assessing the procedural time savings and decreasing the x-ray radiation exposure.
© 2020 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32819903      PMCID: PMC7583122          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  31 in total

Review 1.  Update on New Tools for Three-dimensional Navigation in Endovascular Procedures.

Authors:  Jos C van den Berg
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2014-12-01

2.  Zero-contrast thoracic endovascular aortic repair using image fusion.

Authors:  Hicham Kobeiter; Julien Nahum; Jean-Pierre Becquemin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Preoperative CT-scan-based sizing and in-stent restenosis in peripheral endovascular revascularizations.

Authors:  Adrien Kaladji; Maximilien Giovannetti; Remy Pascot; Elodie Clochard; Anne Daoudal; Antoine Lucas; Alain Cardon
Journal:  Vascular       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 1.285

4.  Augmented 3D venous navigation for neuroendovascular procedures.

Authors:  Raphaël Blanc; Robert Fahed; Pascal Roux; Stanislas Smajda; Gabriele Ciccio; Jean-Philippe Desilles; Hocine Redjem; Mikael Mazighi; Humain Baharvahdat; Michel Piotin
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.836

Review 5.  The use of 3D image fusion for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of iliac artery obstructions: validation of the technique and systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Seline R Goudeketting; Stefan G Heinen; Daniel A van den Heuvel; Marco J van Strijen; Michiel W de Haan; Cornelis H Slump; Jean-Paul P de Vries
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 1.888

6.  Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: technical and team training in an immersive virtual reality environment.

Authors:  Nung Rudarakanchana; Isabelle Van Herzeele; Colin D Bicknell; Celia V Riga; Alexander Rolls; Nicholas J W Cheshire; Mohamad S Hamady
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Three-dimensional fusion computed tomography decreases radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast use during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Michael M McNally; Salvatore T Scali; Robert J Feezor; Daniel Neal; Thomas S Huber; Adam W Beck
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Predictors of difficult carotid stenting as determined by aortic arch angiography.

Authors:  Surabhi Madhwal; Vivek Rajagopal; Deepak L Bhatt; Christopher T Bajzer; Patrick Whitlow; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.022

9.  Feasibility and accuracy of fusion imaging during thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Christof Johannes Schulz; Matthias Schmitt; Dittmar Böckler; Philipp Geisbüsch
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Validation studies of virtual reality simulation performance metrics for mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Robert Crossley; Thomas Liebig; Markus Holtmannspoetter; Johan Lindkvist; Pat Henn; Lars Lonn; Anthony Gerald Gallagher
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 5.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.