BACKGROUND: Longer intervals to reperfusion in patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) stroke are associated with worse outcomes and influenced by the operator's ability to navigate individual anatomy. Our aims were to assess the impact of time from puncture to first deployment of the MT device (DT) on technical and clinical outcomes, develop an Anatomical Assessment for Mechanical Thrombectomy Score (ASMETS) that could predict DT and assess how different methods of intracranial access (coaxial-direct or exchange) influence this. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospective database of patients treated with MT for ELVO between November 2015 and August 2018. CTAs were assessed for ASMETS. Intracranial access technique was at the discretion of the operator. Technical and clinical outcomes and complications were recorded. Linear and logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: 92 patients were included. The impact of DT on clinical outcomes was significant. An unfavourable ASMET score is significantly associated with longer DT (p = 0.002) and linear regression showed DT time can be predicted by ASMETS - F(1,90) = 6.182, p = 0.015. No difference was demonstrated between different access techniques. CONCLUSION: CTA-based ASMETS can predict time between arterial puncture and deployment of the mechanical thrombectomy device in stroke patients, irrespective of the technique used to catheterise the target ICA. This could inform the operator in preparing appropriate strategies to overcome challenging vascular anatomy in patients undergoing MT.
BACKGROUND: Longer intervals to reperfusion in patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) stroke are associated with worse outcomes and influenced by the operator's ability to navigate individual anatomy. Our aims were to assess the impact of time from puncture to first deployment of the MT device (DT) on technical and clinical outcomes, develop an Anatomical Assessment for Mechanical Thrombectomy Score (ASMETS) that could predict DT and assess how different methods of intracranial access (coaxial-direct or exchange) influence this. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospective database of patients treated with MT for ELVO between November 2015 and August 2018. CTAs were assessed for ASMETS. Intracranial access technique was at the discretion of the operator. Technical and clinical outcomes and complications were recorded. Linear and logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: 92 patients were included. The impact of DT on clinical outcomes was significant. An unfavourable ASMET score is significantly associated with longer DT (p = 0.002) and linear regression showed DT time can be predicted by ASMETS - F(1,90) = 6.182, p = 0.015. No difference was demonstrated between different access techniques. CONCLUSION: CTA-based ASMETS can predict time between arterial puncture and deployment of the mechanical thrombectomy device in stroke patients, irrespective of the technique used to catheterise the target ICA. This could inform the operator in preparing appropriate strategies to overcome challenging vascular anatomy in patients undergoing MT.
Entities:
Keywords:
Thrombectomy; anatomy; reperfusion; stroke; time
Authors: Shlomi Peretz; Guy Raphaeli; Natan Borenstein; Ronen R Leker; Ran Brauner; Anat Horev; José E Cohen; Gregory Telman; Hen Halevi; David Tanne Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Maxim Mokin; Kenneth V Snyder; Elad I Levy; L Nelson Hopkins; Adnan H Siddiqui Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: T Boeckh-Behrens; M Schubert; A Förschler; S Prothmann; K Kreiser; C Zimmer; J Riegger; J Bauer; F Neff; V Kehl; J Pelisek; L Schirmer; M Mehr; H Poppert Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2014-09-27 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Brian M Snelling; Samir Sur; Sumedh S Shah; Stephanie Chen; Simon A Menaker; David J McCarthy; Dileep R Yavagal; Eric C Peterson; Robert M Starke Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2018-09-06 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Gregory W Albers; Michael P Marks; Stephanie Kemp; Soren Christensen; Jenny P Tsai; Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez; Ryan A McTaggart; Michel T Torbey; May Kim-Tenser; Thabele Leslie-Mazwi; Amrou Sarraj; Scott E Kasner; Sameer A Ansari; Sharon D Yeatts; Scott Hamilton; Michael Mlynash; Jeremy J Heit; Greg Zaharchuk; Sun Kim; Janice Carrozzella; Yuko Y Palesch; Andrew M Demchuk; Roland Bammer; Philip W Lavori; Joseph P Broderick; Maarten G Lansberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Raul G Nogueira; Ashutosh P Jadhav; Diogo C Haussen; Alain Bonafe; Ronald F Budzik; Parita Bhuva; Dileep R Yavagal; Marc Ribo; Christophe Cognard; Ricardo A Hanel; Cathy A Sila; Ameer E Hassan; Monica Millan; Elad I Levy; Peter Mitchell; Michael Chen; Joey D English; Qaisar A Shah; Frank L Silver; Vitor M Pereira; Brijesh P Mehta; Blaise W Baxter; Michael G Abraham; Pedro Cardona; Erol Veznedaroglu; Frank R Hellinger; Lei Feng; Jawad F Kirmani; Demetrius K Lopes; Brian T Jankowitz; Michael R Frankel; Vincent Costalat; Nirav A Vora; Albert J Yoo; Amer M Malik; Anthony J Furlan; Marta Rubiera; Amin Aghaebrahim; Jean-Marc Olivot; Wondwossen G Tekle; Ryan Shields; Todd Graves; Roger J Lewis; Wade S Smith; David S Liebeskind; Jeffrey L Saver; Tudor G Jovin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-11-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Simon Chun Ho Yu; Thomas Wai Hong Leung; Esther Hiu Yee Hung; Kwok Tung Lee; Lawrence Ka Sing Wong Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Surabhi Madhwal; Vivek Rajagopal; Deepak L Bhatt; Christopher T Bajzer; Patrick Whitlow; Samir R Kapadia Journal: J Invasive Cardiol Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 2.022
Authors: Maiwand Sidiq; Emilia Scheidecker; Arne Potreck; Ulf Neuberger; Charlotte S Weyland; Sibu Mundiyanapurath; Martin Bendszus; Markus A Möhlenbruch; Fatih Seker Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 3.649