OBJECTIVES: The aim was to prospectively characterise the effect of the level of breath-hold on heart rate in CT coronary angiography (CTCA) with prospective electrocardiogram (ECG) triggering and its impact on coronary artery attenuation. METHODS: 260 patients (86 women; mean age 59 ± 11 years) underwent 64-slice CTCA using prospective ECG triggering. Prior to CTCA, heart rates were recorded during 15 s of breath-hold at three different levels of inspiration (normal, intermediate and deep). The inspiration level with the lowest heart rate was chosen for actual CTCA scanning. Coronary artery attenuation was measured, and the presence of backflow of contrast material into the inferior vena cava (as an indicator of increased intrathoracic pressure) was recorded. RESULTS: The mean heart rate at breath-hold was significantly different for the three inspiration levels (normal, 60 ± 8 bpm; intermediate, 59 ± 8 bpm; deep, 57 ± 7 bpm; p<0.001). The maximum heart rate reduction in each patient at breath-hold averaged 5.3 ± 5.1 bpm, and was observed at a normal inspiration depth in 23 (9%) patients, at an intermediate inspiration depth in 102 (39%) patients and at deep inspiration in 135 (52%) patients. Overall, there was no association between the level of breath-hold and coronary vessel attenuation (p-value was not significant). However, the backflow of contrast material into the inferior vena cava (n = 26) was found predominantly at deep inspiration levels (p<0.001), and, when it occurred, it was associated with reduced coronary attenuation compared with patients with no backflow (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The breath-hold level to best reduce heart rate for CTCA should be individually assessed prior to scanning because a mean heart rate reduction of 5 bpm can be achieved.
OBJECTIVES: The aim was to prospectively characterise the effect of the level of breath-hold on heart rate in CT coronary angiography (CTCA) with prospective electrocardiogram (ECG) triggering and its impact on coronary artery attenuation. METHODS: 260 patients (86 women; mean age 59 ± 11 years) underwent 64-slice CTCA using prospective ECG triggering. Prior to CTCA, heart rates were recorded during 15 s of breath-hold at three different levels of inspiration (normal, intermediate and deep). The inspiration level with the lowest heart rate was chosen for actual CTCA scanning. Coronary artery attenuation was measured, and the presence of backflow of contrast material into the inferior vena cava (as an indicator of increased intrathoracic pressure) was recorded. RESULTS: The mean heart rate at breath-hold was significantly different for the three inspiration levels (normal, 60 ± 8 bpm; intermediate, 59 ± 8 bpm; deep, 57 ± 7 bpm; p<0.001). The maximum heart rate reduction in each patient at breath-hold averaged 5.3 ± 5.1 bpm, and was observed at a normal inspiration depth in 23 (9%) patients, at an intermediate inspiration depth in 102 (39%) patients and at deep inspiration in 135 (52%) patients. Overall, there was no association between the level of breath-hold and coronary vessel attenuation (p-value was not significant). However, the backflow of contrast material into the inferior vena cava (n = 26) was found predominantly at deep inspiration levels (p<0.001), and, when it occurred, it was associated with reduced coronary attenuation compared with patients with no backflow (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The breath-hold level to best reduce heart rate for CTCA should be individually assessed prior to scanning because a mean heart rate reduction of 5 bpm can be achieved.
Authors: Stephan Achenbach; Tom Giesler; Dieter Ropers; Stefan Ulzheimer; Katharina Anders; Evelyn Wenkel; Karsten Pohle; Marc Kachelriess; Hans Derlien; Willi A Kalender; Werner G Daniel; Werner Bautz; Ulrich Baum Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: James P Earls; Elise L Berman; Bruce A Urban; Charlene A Curry; Judith L Lane; Robert S Jennings; Colin C McCulloch; Jiang Hsieh; John H Londt Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-01-14 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jie Zhang; Joel G Fletcher; W Scott Harmsen; Philip A Araoz; Eric E Williamson; Andrew N Primak; Cynthia H McCollough Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Ronald S Kuzo; Robert A Pooley; Julia E Crook; Michael G Heckman; Thomas C Gerber Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Lars Husmann; Ines Valenta; Oliver Gaemperli; Olivier Adda; Valerie Treyer; Christophe A Wyss; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Fuminari Tatsugami; Gustav K von Schulthess; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-12-18 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Lars Husmann; Sebastian Leschka; Lotus Desbiolles; Tiziano Schepis; Oliver Gaemperli; Burkhardt Seifert; Philippe Cattin; Thomas Frauenfelder; Thomas G Flohr; Borut Marincek; Philipp A Kaufmann; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-09-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Rami M Abazid; Osama A Smettei; Ahmad Almeman; Sawsan Sayed; Hanaa Alsaqqa; Salma M Abdelmageed; Fahad J Alharbi; Abdullah M Alhabib; Mouaz H Al-Mallah Journal: J Saudi Heart Assoc Date: 2018-11-17
Authors: Jelena R Ghadri; Egle Kazakauskaite; Stefanie Braunschweig; Irene A Burger; Michelle Frank; Michael Fiechter; Catherine Gebhard; Tobias A Fuchs; Christian Templin; Oliver Gaemperli; Thomas F Lüscher; Christian Schmied; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 2.298