Literature DB >> 21191087

Determinants of synonymous and nonsynonymous variability in three species of Drosophila.

Penelope R Haddrill1, Kai Zeng, Brian Charlesworth.   

Abstract

We estimated the intensity of selection on preferred codons in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. miranda at X-linked and autosomal loci, using a published data set on sequence variability at 67 loci, by means of an improved method that takes account of demographic effects. We found evidence for stronger selection at X-linked loci, consistent with their higher levels of codon usage bias. The estimates of the strength of selection and mutational bias in favor of unpreferred codons were similar to those found in other species, after taking into account the fact that D. pseudoobscura showed evidence for a recent expansion in population size. We examined correlates of synonymous and nonsynonymous diversity in these species and found no evidence for effects of recurrent selective sweeps on nonsynonymous mutations, which is probably because this set of genes have much higher than average levels of selective constraints. There was evidence for correlated effects of levels of selective constraints on protein sequences and on codon usage, as expected under models of selection for translational accuracy. Our analysis of a published data set on D. melanogaster provided evidence for the effects of selective sweeps of nonsynonymous mutations on linked synonymous diversity, but only in the subset of loci that experienced the highest rates of nonsynonymous substitutions (about one-quarter of the total) and not at more slowly evolving loci. Our correlational analysis of this data set suggested that both selective constraints on protein sequences and recurrent selective sweeps affect the overall level of codon usage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21191087     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  27 in total

1.  Patterns of neutral diversity under general models of selective sweeps.

Authors:  Graham Coop; Peter Ralph
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The joint effects of background selection and genetic recombination on local gene genealogies.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Selection on codon usage and base composition in Drosophila americana.

Authors:  Sophie Marion de Procé; Kai Zeng; Andrea J Betancourt; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  The role of background selection in shaping patterns of molecular evolution and variation: evidence from variability on the Drosophila X chromosome.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Recent and Long-Term Selection Across Synonymous Sites in Drosophila ananassae.

Authors:  Jae Young Choi; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Estimating the parameters of background selection and selective sweeps in Drosophila in the presence of gene conversion.

Authors:  José Luis Campos; Lei Zhao; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A coalescent model of background selection with recombination, demography and variation in selection coefficients.

Authors:  K Zeng
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Natural selection affects multiple aspects of genetic variation at putatively neutral sites across the human genome.

Authors:  Kirk E Lohmueller; Anders Albrechtsen; Yingrui Li; Su Yeon Kim; Thorfinn Korneliussen; Nicolas Vinckenbosch; Geng Tian; Emilia Huerta-Sanchez; Alison F Feder; Niels Grarup; Torben Jørgensen; Tao Jiang; Daniel R Witte; Annelli Sandbæk; Ines Hellmann; Torsten Lauritzen; Torben Hansen; Oluf Pedersen; Jun Wang; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Codon usage bias and effective population sizes on the X chromosome versus the autosomes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jose L Campos; Kai Zeng; Darren J Parker; Brian Charlesworth; Penelope R Haddrill
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Strong purifying selection at synonymous sites in D. melanogaster.

Authors:  David S Lawrie; Philipp W Messer; Ruth Hershberg; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.