Literature DB >> 14738738

Selection on codon usage in Drosophila americana.

Xulio Maside1, Angela Weishan Lee, Brian Charlesworth.   

Abstract

Synonymous codons are not used at random, significantly influencing the base composition of the genome. The selection-mutation-drift model proposes that this bias reflects natural selection in favor of a subset of preferred codons. Previous estimates in Drosophila of the intensity of selective forces involved seem too large to be reconciled with theoretical predictions of the level of codon bias. This probably results from confounding effects of the demographic histories of the species concerned. We have studied three species of the virilis group of Drosophila, which are more likely to satisfy the assumptions of the evolutionary models. We analyzed the patterns of polymorphism and divergence in a sample of 18 genes and applied a new method for estimating the intensity of selection on synonymous mutations based on the frequencies of unpreferred mutations among polymorphic sites. This yielded estimates of selection intensities (N(e)s) of the order of 0.65, which is more compatible with the observed levels of codon bias. Our results support the action of both selection and mutational bias on codon usage bias and suggest that codon usage and genome base composition in the D. americana lineage are in approximate equilibrium. Biased gene conversion may also contribute to the observed patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14738738     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.12.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  36 in total

1.  Weak selection and recent mutational changes influence polymorphic synonymous mutations in humans.

Authors:  Josep M Comeron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Patterns of selection on synonymous and nonsynonymous variants in Drosophila miranda.

Authors:  Carolina Bartolomé; Xulio Maside; Soojin Yi; Anna L Grant; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Forces that influence the evolution of codon bias.

Authors:  Paul M Sharp; Laura R Emery; Kai Zeng
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The effects of demography and linkage on the estimation of selection and mutation parameters.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Weak selection revealed by the whole-genome comparison of the X chromosome and autosomes of human and chimpanzee.

Authors:  Jian Lu; Chung-I Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Relationships among stop codon usage bias, its context, isochores, and gene expression level in various eukaryotes.

Authors:  Jingchun Sun; Ming Chen; Jinlin Xu; Jianhua Luo
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Evolution of amino-acid sequences and codon usage on the Drosophila miranda neo-sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Carolina Bartolomé; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Intragenic spatial patterns of codon usage bias in prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Hong Qin; Wei Biao Wu; Josep M Comeron; Martin Kreitman; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Fundamental concepts in genetics: effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Studying patterns of recent evolution at synonymous sites and intronic sites in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.