BACKGROUND: We investigated a simple imaging sign for Alzheimer's disease (AD), using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). We hypothesized that a reduction in fractional anisotropy (FA) in the fornix could be utilized as an imaging sign. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with AD, 24 patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and 25 control participants (NC) underwent DTI at baseline and 1 year later. The diagnosis was reevaluated 1 year and 3 years after the initial scan. A color-scaled FA map was used to visually identify the FA reduction ("fornix sign"). We investigated whether the fornix sign could separate AD from NC, and could predict progression from aMCI to AD or NC to aMCI. We also quantified FA of the fornix to validate the fornix sign. RESULTS: The fornix sign was identical to the lack of any voxels with an FA > .52 within the fornix. The fornix sign differentiated AD from NC with specificity of 1.0 and sensitivity of .56. It predicted conversion from NC to aMCI with specificity of 1.0 and sensitivity of .67, and from aMCI to AD with specificity of .94 and sensitivity of .83. CONCLUSION: The fornix sign is a promising predictive imaging sign of AD.
BACKGROUND: We investigated a simple imaging sign for Alzheimer's disease (AD), using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). We hypothesized that a reduction in fractional anisotropy (FA) in the fornix could be utilized as an imaging sign. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with AD, 24 patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and 25 control participants (NC) underwent DTI at baseline and 1 year later. The diagnosis was reevaluated 1 year and 3 years after the initial scan. A color-scaled FA map was used to visually identify the FA reduction ("fornix sign"). We investigated whether the fornix sign could separate AD from NC, and could predict progression from aMCI to AD or NC to aMCI. We also quantified FA of the fornix to validate the fornix sign. RESULTS: The fornix sign was identical to the lack of any voxels with an FA > .52 within the fornix. The fornix sign differentiated AD from NC with specificity of 1.0 and sensitivity of .56. It predicted conversion from NC to aMCI with specificity of 1.0 and sensitivity of .67, and from aMCI to AD with specificity of .94 and sensitivity of .83. CONCLUSION: The fornix sign is a promising predictive imaging sign of AD.
Authors: Charles D Smith; Himachandra Chebrolu; Anders H Andersen; David A Powell; Mark A Lovell; Shuling Xiong; Brian T Gold Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2008-09-17 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: M Bozzali; A Falini; M Franceschi; M Cercignani; M Zuffi; G Scotti; G Comi; M Filippi Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Andreas Fellgiebel; Matthias J Müller; Paulo Wille; Paulo R Dellani; Armin Scheurich; Lutz G Schmidt; Peter Stoeter Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2005-01-12 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Djyldyz Sydykova; Robert Stahl; Olaf Dietrich; Michael Ewers; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Harald Hampel; Stefan J Teipel Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2006-12-12 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: D H Salat; D S Tuch; A J W van der Kouwe; D N Greve; V Pappu; S Y Lee; N D Hevelone; A K Zaleta; J H Growdon; S Corkin; B Fischl; H D Rosas Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: M M Mielke; N A Kozauer; K C G Chan; M George; J Toroney; M Zerrate; K Bandeen-Roche; M-C Wang; P Vanzijl; J J Pekar; S Mori; C G Lyketsos; M Albert Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-02-05 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Denise Head; Randy L Buckner; Joshua S Shimony; Laura E Williams; Erbil Akbudak; Thomas E Conturo; Mark McAvoy; John C Morris; Abraham Z Snyder Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Kejal Kantarci; Christopher G Schwarz; Robert I Reid; Scott A Przybelski; Timothy G Lesnick; Samantha M Zuk; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Val Lowe; Mary M Machulda; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Brian T Gold; Zude Zhu; Christopher A Brown; Anders H Andersen; Mary Jo LaDu; Leon Tai; Greg A Jicha; Richard J Kryscio; Steven Estus; Peter T Nelson; Steve W Scheff; Erin Abner; Frederick A Schmitt; Linda J Van Eldik; Charles D Smith Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2014-05-02 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Erin L Boespflug; Judd Storrs; Sara Sadat-Hossieny; James Eliassen; Marcelle Shidler; Matthew Norris; Robert Krikorian Journal: Brain Struct Funct Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 3.270