BACKGROUND: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a promising method for identifying significant cross-sectional differences of white-matter tracts in normal controls (NC) and those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer's disease (AD). There have not been many studies establishing its longitudinal utility. METHODS: Seventy-five participants (25 NC, 25 amnestic MCI, and 25 AD) had 3-Tesla MRI scans and clinical evaluations at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) were analyzed at each time-point and longitudinally in eight a priori-selected areas taken from four regions of interest (ROIs). RESULTS: Cross-sectionally, MD values were higher, and FA values lower in the fornix and splenium of the AD group compared with either MCI or NC (P < .01). Within-group change was more evident in MD than in FA over 12 months: MD increased in the inferior, anterior cingulum, and fornix in both the MCI and AD groups (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: There were stable, cross-sectional, region-specific differences between the NC and AD groups in both FA and MD at each time-point over 12 months. Longitudinally, MD was a better indicator of change than FA. Significant increases of fornix MD in the MCI group suggest this is an early indicator of progression.
BACKGROUND: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a promising method for identifying significant cross-sectional differences of white-matter tracts in normal controls (NC) and those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer's disease (AD). There have not been many studies establishing its longitudinal utility. METHODS: Seventy-five participants (25 NC, 25 amnestic MCI, and 25 AD) had 3-Tesla MRI scans and clinical evaluations at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) were analyzed at each time-point and longitudinally in eight a priori-selected areas taken from four regions of interest (ROIs). RESULTS: Cross-sectionally, MD values were higher, and FA values lower in the fornix and splenium of the AD group compared with either MCI or NC (P < .01). Within-group change was more evident in MD than in FA over 12 months: MD increased in the inferior, anterior cingulum, and fornix in both the MCI and AD groups (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: There were stable, cross-sectional, region-specific differences between the NC and AD groups in both FA and MD at each time-point over 12 months. Longitudinally, MD was a better indicator of change than FA. Significant increases of fornix MD in the MCI group suggest this is an early indicator of progression.
Authors: B Reisberg; E H Franssen; S M Hasan; I Monteiro; I Boksay; L E Souren; S Kenowsky; S R Auer; S Elahi; A Kluger Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 1999 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Andreas Fellgiebel; Matthias J Müller; Paulo Wille; Paulo R Dellani; Armin Scheurich; Lutz G Schmidt; Peter Stoeter Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2005-01-12 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Djyldyz Sydykova; Robert Stahl; Olaf Dietrich; Michael Ewers; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Harald Hampel; Stefan J Teipel Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2006-12-12 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: E Cavedo; S Lista; Z Khachaturian; P Aisen; P Amouyel; K Herholz; C R Jack; R Sperling; J Cummings; K Blennow; S O'Bryant; G B Frisoni; A Khachaturian; M Kivipelto; W Klunk; K Broich; S Andrieu; M Thiebaut de Schotten; J-F Mangin; A A Lammertsma; K Johnson; S Teipel; A Drzezga; A Bokde; O Colliot; H Bakardjian; H Zetterberg; B Dubois; B Vellas; L S Schneider; H Hampel Journal: J Prev Alzheimers Dis Date: 2014-12
Authors: Kilian M Pohl; Edith V Sullivan; Torsten Rohlfing; Weiwei Chu; Dongjin Kwon; B Nolan Nichols; Yong Zhang; Sandra A Brown; Susan F Tapert; Kevin Cummins; Wesley K Thompson; Ty Brumback; Ian M Colrain; Fiona C Baker; Devin Prouty; Michael D De Bellis; James T Voyvodic; Duncan B Clark; Claudiu Schirda; Bonnie J Nagel; Adolf Pfefferbaum Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Wenjun Li; L Tugan Muftuler; Gang Chen; B Douglas Ward; Matthew D Budde; Jennifer L Jones; Malgorzata B Franczak; Piero G Antuono; Shi-Jiang Li; Joseph S Goveas Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Nicola J Ray; Claudia Metzler-Baddeley; Mizanur R Khondoker; Michel J Grothe; Stefan Teipel; Paul Wright; Helmut Heinsen; Derek K Jones; John P Aggleton; Michael J O'Sullivan Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2015-01-14 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Jennifer S Rabin; Rodrigo D Perea; Rachel F Buckley; Taylor E Neal; Randy L Buckner; Keith A Johnson; Reisa A Sperling; Trey Hedden Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Kejal Kantarci; Christopher G Schwarz; Robert I Reid; Scott A Przybelski; Timothy G Lesnick; Samantha M Zuk; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Val Lowe; Mary M Machulda; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Jennifer S Rabin; Rodrigo D Perea; Rachel F Buckley; Keith A Johnson; Reisa A Sperling; Trey Hedden Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2019-05-16 Impact factor: 4.673