| Literature DB >> 21848611 |
Roland J Siezen1, Michiel Kleerebezem.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21848611 PMCID: PMC3819005 DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2011.00290.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Biotechnol ISSN: 1751-7915 Impact factor: 5.813
Figure 1Phylogenetic differences between enterotypes. Between‐class analysis, which visualizes results from PCA and clustering, of the genus compositions of 33 Sanger metagenomes estimated by mapping the metagenome reads to 1511 reference genome sequences using an 85% similarity threshold (a), Danish subset containing 85 metagenomes from a published Illumina data set (b), and 154 pyrosequencing‐based 16S sequences (c) reveals three robust clusters that we call enterotypes. Two principal components are plotted using the ade4 package in R with each sample represented by a filled circle. The centre of gravity for each cluster is marked by a rectangle and the coloured ellipse covers 67% of the samples belonging to the cluster. IBD, inflammatory bowel disease. Adapted by permission from Macmillan Publishers: Nature (Arumugam ), copyright 2011.
Figure 2Main contributors to enterotypes. a. Phylum abundance box plots of the main contributors of each enterotype from the Sanger metagenomes as determined by read abundance. b. Co‐occurrence networks of the three enterotypes from the Sanger metagenomes. Unclassified genera under a higher rank are marked by asterisks. Adapted by permission from Macmillan Publishers: Nature (Arumugam ), copyright 2011.