Literature DB >> 21844921

Esophageal acid exposure decreases intraluminal baseline impedance levels.

Boudewijn F Kessing1, Albert J Bredenoord, Pim W Weijenborg, Gerrit J M Hemmink, Clara M Loots, A J P M Smout.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Intraluminal baseline impedance levels are determined by the conductivity of the esophageal wall and can be decreased in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the baseline impedance in GERD patients, on and off proton pump inhibitor (PPI), and in healthy controls.
METHODS: Ambulatory 24-h pH-impedance monitoring was performed in (i) 24 GERD patients with and 24 without pathological esophageal acid exposure as well as in 10 healthy controls and in (ii) 20 patients with refractory GERD symptoms despite PPI, once on PPI and once off PPI. Baseline impedance levels in the most distal and the most proximal impedance channels were assessed.
RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) distal baseline impedance in patients with physiological (2,090 (1,537-2,547) Ω) and pathological (781 (612-1,137) Ω) acid exposure was lower than in controls (2,827 (2,127-3,270) Ω, P<0.05 and P<0.001). A negative correlation between 24-h acid exposure time and baseline impedance was observed (r=-0.7, P<0.001). In patients measured off and on PPI, median distal baseline impedance off PPI was significantly lower than on PPI (886 (716-1,354) vs. 1,372 (961-1,955) Ω, P<0.05) and distal baseline impedance in these groups was significantly lower than in healthy controls (P<0.05 and P<0.001). Proximal baseline impedance did not differ significantly between the patients off PPI and on PPI (1,793 (1,384-2,489) vs. 1,893 (1,610-2,561) Ω); however, baseline impedance values in both measurements were significantly lower than in healthy controls (3,648 (2,815-3,932) Ω, both P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that baseline impedance is related to esophageal acid exposure and could be a marker of reflux-induced changes to the esophageal mucosa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21844921     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2011.276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  58 in total

Review 1.  Esophageal testing: What we have so far.

Authors:  Nicola de Bortoli; Irene Martinucci; Lorenzo Bertani; Salvatore Russo; Riccardo Franchi; Manuele Furnari; Salvatore Tolone; Giorgia Bodini; Valeria Bolognesi; Massimo Bellini; Vincenzo Savarino; Santino Marchi; Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-02-15

Review 2.  Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of GERD: New Tricks for an Old Disease.

Authors:  Rishi D Naik; Lauren Evers; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03

3.  Impairment of chemical clearance and mucosal integrity distinguishes hypersensitive esophagus from functional heartburn.

Authors:  Marzio Frazzoni; Nicola de Bortoli; Leonardo Frazzoni; Manuele Furnari; Irene Martinucci; Salvatore Tolone; Andrea Farioli; Santino Marchi; Lorenzo Fuccio; Vincenzo Savarino; Edoardo Savarino
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  Development and Validation of a Mucosal Impedance Contour Analysis System to Distinguish Esophageal Disorders.

Authors:  Dhyanesh A Patel; Tina Higginbotham; James C Slaughter; Muhammad Aslam; Elif Yuksel; David Katzka; C Prakash Gyawali; Melina Mashi; John Pandolfino; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  Adult and paediatric GERD: diagnosis, phenotypes and avoidance of excess treatments.

Authors:  Kornilia Nikaki; Philip Woodland; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 6.  Esophageal Impedance Monitoring: Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Karthik Ravi; David A Katzka
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Lower oesophageal sphincter identification for gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: The step-up method revisited with use of basal impedance.

Authors:  Aurelio Mauro; Marianna Franchina; Dario Consonni; Roberto Penagini
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 8.  BSPGHAN Motility Working Group position statement: paediatric multichannel intraluminal pH impedance monitoring-indications, methods and interpretation.

Authors:  Mohamed Mutalib; David Rawat; Keith Lindley; Osvaldo Borrelli; Steve Perring; Marcus K H Auth; Nikhil Thapar
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-15

9.  Effect of proton pump inhibition on acid, weakly acid and weakly alkaline gastro-esophageal reflux in children.

Authors:  Helena Turk; Bruno Hauser; Jernej Brecelj; Yvan Vandenplas; Rok Orel
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.764

10.  [Modern diagnostic tools for esophageal pathologies].

Authors:  A Kandulski; P Malfertheiner; J Weigt
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.