Literature DB >> 21844318

Comparative susceptibilities to fidaxomicin (OPT-80) of isolates collected at baseline, recurrence, and failure from patients in two phase III trials of fidaxomicin against Clostridium difficile infection.

Ellie J C Goldstein1, Diane M Citron, Pamela Sears, Farah Babakhani, Susan P Sambol, Dale N Gerding.   

Abstract

A 10-day course of oral fidaxomicin (200 mg twice a day [b.i.d.]), a potent new macrocyclic drug, was compared to vancomycin (125 mg four times a day [q.i.d.]) in 1,164 adults (1,105 in the modified intent-to-treat [mITT] population) with Clostridium difficile infection in two phase III randomized, double-blind trials at sites in North America and 7 European countries. Of 1,105 mITT patients, 792 (71.7%), including 719/999 (72.0%) in the per-protocol (PP) population, provided a C. difficile strain at baseline, of whom 356 received fidaxomicin with 330 cures (92.7%) and 363 received vancomycin with 329 cures (90.6%). The susceptibilities (MIC(90)) of baseline isolates did not predict clinical cure, failure, or recurrence for fidaxomicin (MIC(90), 0.25 μg/ml for both; range, ≤ 0.007 to 1 μg/ml), but there was a one-dilution difference in the MIC(90) (but not the MIC(50)) for vancomycin (MIC(90), 2 μg/ml [range, 0.25 to 8 μg/ml] for cure and 4.0 μg/ml [range, 0.5 to 4 μg/ml] for failures). A total of 65 (7.9%) "rifaximin-resistant" (MIC > 256 μg/ml) strains were isolated in both treatment groups on enrollment, which increased to 25% for failures at the end of therapy. No resistance to either fidaxomicin or vancomycin developed during treatment in either of the phase III studies, although a single strain isolated from a cured patient had an elevated fidaxomicin MIC of 16 μg/ml at the time of recurrence. All isolates were susceptible to ≤ 4 μg/ml of metronidazole. When analyzed by restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) type, 247/719 (34.4%) isolates were BI group isolates, and the MICs were generally higher for all four drugs tested (MIC(90)s: fidaxomicin, 0.5; vancomycin, 2.0; metronidazole, 2.0; and rifaximin, >256 μg/ml) than for the other REA types. There was no correlation between the MIC of a baseline clinical isolate and clinical outcome. MIC(90)s were generally low for fidaxomicin and vancomycin, but BI isolates had higher MICs than other REA group isolates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21844318      PMCID: PMC3195051          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00625-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  20 in total

1.  In vitro activities of OPT-80 and comparator drugs against intestinal bacteria.

Authors:  Sydney M Finegold; Denise Molitoris; Marja-Liisa Vaisanen; Yuli Song; Chengxu Liu; Mauricio Bolaños
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Thomas J Louie; Mark A Miller; Kathleen M Mullane; Karl Weiss; Arnold Lentnek; Yoav Golan; Sherwood Gorbach; Pamela Sears; Youe-Kong Shue
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Interruption of recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea episodes by serial therapy with vancomycin and rifaximin.

Authors:  Stuart Johnson; Christopher Schriever; Minerva Galang; Ciarán P Kelly; Dale N Gerding
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Lipiarmycin, a new antibiotic from Actinoplanes III. Mechanism of action.

Authors:  S Sergio; G Pirali; R White; F Parenti
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of tiacumicins B and C against Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  R N Swanson; D J Hardy; N L Shipkowitz; C W Hanson; N C Ramer; P B Fernandes; J J Clement
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Development of a rapid and efficient restriction endonuclease analysis typing system for Clostridium difficile and correlation with other typing systems.

Authors:  C R Clabots; S Johnson; K M Bettin; P A Mathie; M E Mulligan; D R Schaberg; L R Peterson; D N Gerding
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  A comparison of vancomycin and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, stratified by disease severity.

Authors:  Fred A Zar; Srinivasa R Bakkanagari; K M L S T Moorthi; Melinda B Davis
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  In vitro activities of 15 antimicrobial agents against 110 toxigenic clostridium difficile clinical isolates collected from 1983 to 2004.

Authors:  David W Hecht; Minerva A Galang; Susan P Sambol; James R Osmolski; Stuart Johnson; Dale N Gerding
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  In vitro activity of OPT-80 against Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Grit Ackermann; Birgit Löffler; Daniela Adler; Arne C Rodloff
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults.

Authors:  R Nelson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18
View more
  36 in total

1.  Fidaxomicin: in Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Sean T Duggan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Clostridium difficile infection in patients with HIV/AIDS.

Authors:  Paul J Collini; Ed Kuijper; David H Dockrell
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.071

3.  Comparative in vitro activities of LFF571 against Clostridium difficile and 630 other intestinal strains of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  Diane M Citron; Kerin L Tyrrell; C Vreni Merriam; Ellie J C Goldstein
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Characterizations of clinical isolates of clostridium difficile by toxin genotypes and by susceptibility to 12 antimicrobial agents, including fidaxomicin (OPT-80) and rifaximin: a multicenter study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chun-Hsing Liao; Wen-Chien Ko; Jang-Jih Lu; Po-Ren Hsueh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Recent advances in the understanding of antibiotic resistance in Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Patrizia Spigaglia
Journal:  Ther Adv Infect Dis       Date:  2016-02

Review 6.  Fidaxomicin in Clostridium difficile infection: latest evidence and clinical guidance.

Authors:  Kathleen Mullane
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Comparative microbiological studies of transcription inhibitors fidaxomicin and the rifamycins in Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Farah Babakhani; Jaime Seddon; Pamela Sears
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Genome Location Dictates the Transcriptional Response to PolC Inhibition in Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Erika van Eijk; Ilse M Boekhoud; Ed J Kuijper; Ingrid M J G Bos-Sanders; George Wright; Wiep Klaas Smits
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Safety and efficacy of fidaxomicin in the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  Yoav Golan; Lauren Epstein
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.409

10.  Fidaxomicin inhibits Clostridium difficile toxin A-mediated enteritis in the mouse ileum.

Authors:  Hon Wai Koon; Samantha Ho; Tressia C Hing; Michelle Cheng; Xinhua Chen; Yoshi Ichikawa; Ciarán P Kelly; Charalabos Pothoulakis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.