| Literature DB >> 19822012 |
Emma J Dawes1, Thomas S Churcher, Shijie Zhuang, Robert E Sinden, María-Gloria Basáñez.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Daily mortality is an important determinant of a vector's ability to transmit pathogens. Original simplifying assumptions in malaria transmission models presume vector mortality is independent of age, infection status and parasite load. Previous studies illustrate conflicting evidence as to the importance of Plasmodium-induced vector mortality, but very few studies to date have considered the effect of infection density on mosquito survival.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19822012 PMCID: PMC2770541 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-228
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Figure 1Schematic representation of the experimental design. Three experiments were conducted each consisting of 4 cages of An. stephensi mosquitoes, represented by boxes in the figure.
Summary statistics for cages of An. stephensi mosquitoes fed different estimated P. berghei ookinete densities
| Experiment (date) | Estimated ookinete density fed (per μl) | Mean‡ number of oocysts per mosquito on day 10* (range) | Mean‡ sporozoite score† per mosquito on day 22* | Total number of mosquitoes in each cage | Median survival (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 442 | 32 (30, 34) | |||
| (August 2007) | 100 | 46.4 (0-251) | 2.4 | 399 | ND (25, ND) |
| 400 | 141.8 (0-307) | 3.0 | 645 | 26 (23, 31) | |
| 2,000 | 259.6 (0-591) | 3.7 | 562 | 21 (19, 24) | |
| 0 | 733 | 33 (32, 35) | |||
| (April 2008) | 100 | 55.3 (0-212) | 2.0 | 565 | ND (ND, ND) |
| 400 | 83.1 (0-259) | 2.6 | 662 | 34 (32, ND) | |
| 2,000 | 138.4 (0-477) | 1.8 | 502 | 30 (29, ND) | |
| 0 | 625 | 42 (41, ND) | |||
| (July 2008) | 50 | 11.3 (0-47) | 1.2 | 815 | 36 (35, 37) |
| 250 | 67.6 (0-121) | 1.7 | 852 | 36 (34, 38) | |
| 1,000 | 96.8 (0-200) | 2.9 | 999 | 34 (32, 35) |
‡ Arithmetic mean parasite load in 20, randomly chosen surviving mosquitoes.
* Parasite densities presented from the dissections on days 10 and 22 as these are the standard days used in determining oocyst and salivary gland sporozoite density and therefore allow comparisons to be made with published studies, such as Sinden et al [47].
† Sporozoites counted using a scoring system; 0, 0 sporozoites; 1, 1 to 10 sporozoites; 2, 11 to 100 sporozoites; 3, 101 to 1,000 sporozoites; 4, 1,001 to 10,000 sporozoites; 5, over 10,000 sporozoites.
ND, not determined as survival curve does not cross 0.5 and therefore the median survival cannot be calculated.
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier survival curves with time post-engorgement for each group of . (A) Experiment 1. Colors; black = 0 ookinetes per μl of blood fed; red = 100 ookinetes per μl of blood fed; green = 400 ookinetes per μl of blood fed; blue = 2,000 ookinetes per μl of blood fed. (B) Experiment 2. Colors as in panel A: (C) Experiment 3. Colors; black = 0 ookinetes per μl of blood fed; dark red = 50 ookinetes per μl of blood fed; dark green = 250 ookinetes per μl of blood fed, dark blue = 1,000 ookinetes per μl of blood fed.
Figure 3Mortality rate with time post-engorgement. Relationship between the mortality rate of An. stephensi mosquitoes fed on blood containing different densities of P. berghei ookinetes and time post-engorgement (days). Markers correspond to the observed death rates plotted for the mid-point of each time interval. The lines are the best fit hazard model defined in Equation (2) for each parasite density, and the shaded area corresponds to 95% confidence intervals. Panels A to G represent increasing ookinete density per μl of blood fed, with colors as in Figure 2; (A) Control (0 ookinetes). (B) 50 ookinetes. (C) 100 ookinetes. (D) 250 ookinetes. (E) 400 ookinetes. (F) 1,000 ookinetes. (G) 2,000 ookinetes. (H) Hazard curves from each of the parasite densities on a single axis to facilitate comparison; colors as in panels A to G, in order from lowest to highest at time post engorgement = zero (where curves cross the y-axis), 0, 50, 100, 250, 400, 1000 and 2000 ookinetes per μl of blood fed. Figure 4 illustrates how the parameters of the mortality function vary with ookinete density fed to the mosquitoes.
Results of two-sample and multi-sample statistical comparisons of An. stephensi survival times.
| Experiment (Date) | Mosquito Group (Ookinete density per μl of blood) | Test Statistic | Statistical Results | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 400 | 2,000 | ||||
| (August 2007) | 0 | Hazard Ratio (HR) | 1.1413 | 1.4261 | 2.2004 | |
| HR C.I. | (0.87, 1.50) | (1.17, 1.74) | (1.77, 2.74) | |||
| Mantel-Cox | 0.9124 | 12.4278 | 52.6238 | |||
| P-value | 0.3395 | 0.0004* | <0.0001* | |||
| 100 | HR | 1.4003 | 1.9702 | |||
| HR C.I. | (1.09, 1.80) | (1.52, 2.55) | ||||
| Mantel-Cox | 6.9297 | 27.2606 | ||||
| P-value | 0.0085* | <0.0001* | ||||
| 400 | HR | 1.4023 | ||||
| HR C.I. | (1.16, 1.70) | |||||
| Mantel-Cox | 12.2886 | |||||
| P-value | 0.0005* | |||||
| All 4 Groups | Log-rank | 55.89 | ||||
| P-value | <0.0001* | |||||
| 100 | 400 | 2,000 | ||||
| (April 2008) | 0 | HR | 0.7312 | 1.1786 | 1.7447 | |
| HR C.I. | (0.58, 0.92) | (0.97, 1.44) | (1.38, 2.20) | |||
| Mantel-Cox | 7.0017 | 2.6747 | 22.3554 | |||
| P-value | 0.0081* | 0.1020 | <0.0001* | |||
| 100 | HR | 1.6063 | 2.1607 | |||
| HR C.I. | (1.27, 2.03) | (1.65, 2.82) | ||||
| Mantel-Cox | 15.7261 | 33.6528 | ||||
| P-value | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | ||||
| 400 | HR | 1.3186 | ||||
| HR C.I. | (1.05, 1.66) | |||||
| Mantel-Cox | 5.6392 | |||||
| P-value | 0.0176* | |||||
| All 4 Groups | Log-rank | 31.20 | ||||
| P-value | <0.0001* | |||||
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | ||||
| (July 2008) | 0 | HR | 2.2198 | 2.1914 | 2.5451 | |
| HR C.I. | (1.77, 2.79) | (1.76, 2.73) | (2.06, 3.15) | |||
| Mantel-Cox | 49.5610 | 51.1026 | 78.9376 | |||
| P-value | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | |||
| 50 | HR | 1.0144 | 1.1677 | |||
| HR C.I. | (0.86, 1.20) | (0.99, 1.37) | ||||
| Mantel-Cox | 0.0283 | 3.7481 | ||||
| P-value | 0.8664 | 0.0529 | ||||
| 250 | HR | 1.1543 | ||||
| HR C.I. | (0.99, 1.34) | |||||
| Mantel-Cox | 3.5264 | |||||
| P-value | 0.0604 | |||||
| All 4 Groups | Log-rank | 36.61 | ||||
| P-value | <0.0001* | |||||
* Significant at 5% level
C.I., 95% confidence interval.
Cox regression analysis results.
| Variable | Coefficient | Standard Error | Hazard Ratio (95% C.I.) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (0) | 0 | - | 1 | - |
| 50 | 0.754 | 0.112 | 2.125 (1.707, 2.645) | <0.001* |
| 100 | -0.074 | 0.086 | 0.928 (0.784, 1.099 | 0.390 |
| 250 | 0.767 | 0.110 | 2.153 (1.737, 2.669) | <0.001* |
| 400 | 0.314 | 0.067 | 1.369 (1.200, 1.561) | <0.001* |
| 1000 | 0.887 | 0.106 | 2.429 (1.974, 2.988) | <0.001* |
| 2000 | 0.639 | 0.071 | 1.894 (1.649, 2.176) | <0.001* |
| Experiment 1 | 0 | - | 1 | - |
| Experiment 2 | -0.411 | 0.053 | 0.663 (0.598, 0.735) | <0.001* |
| Experiment 3 | -1.000 | 0.105 | 0.368 (0.299, 0.452) | <0.001* |
| Control (0) | 0 | - | 1 | - |
| Ookinete density | 3.26 × 10-4 | 2.88 × 10-5 | 1.00032 (1.0003, 1.0004) | <0.001* |
| Experiment 1 | 0 | - | 1 | - |
| Experiment 2 | -0.421 | 0.052 | 0.656 (0.593, 0.727) | <0.001* |
| Experiment 3 | -0.474 | 0.046 | 0.622 (0.569, 0.680) | <0.001* |
* Significant at 5% level
Figure 5Mosquito life expectancy. Life expectancy of mosquitoes maintained in the laboratory, plotted against time post-engorgement and number of ookinetes per μl of blood fed to the mosquitoes. The life expectancy values are generated from Equation (4) with S(t, K) as defined in Equation (3).
Figure 4Relationship between parameters of the mortality function and ookinete density fed. Linear functions (as illustrated in Equation (2)) are fitted to the relationship between the parameter values of the mortality function and parasite density fed to each group of mosquitoes (ookinetes per μl of blood). Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals. (A) Parameter ν, which predominantly represents the increase in mortality rate with time-post feeding; parameter values (and 95% confidence intervals), ν0 = 1.18 × 10-4 (4.65 × 10-5, 1.40 × 10-4)**, ν1 = 6.43 × 10-8 (4.29 × 10-8, 2.60 × 10-7)**. (B) Parameter δ, which predominantly represents the initial decline in mortality rate with time post-feeding; δ1 = -3.27 × 10-3 (-4.13 × 10-3, -1.31 × 10-3)**, δ1 = -1.30 × 10-6 (-6.77 × 10-6, -1.24 × 10-6)*. (C) Parameter θ, which represents the mortality rate at the time of feeding; θ0 = 3.09 × 10-2 (9.69 × 10-3, 5.06 × 10-2)**, θ1 = 1.07 × 10-5 (5.99 × 10-6, 5.33 × 10-5)*. Significant p-values (* represents a p-value < 0.05 and ** represents a p-value < 0.001) indicate that the best-fit mortality function includes each of the parameter values in Equation (2).