Literature DB >> 21842405

Objective visual field determination in forensic ophthalmology with an optimized 4-channel multifocal VEP perimetry system: a case report of a patient with retinitis pigmentosa.

C Kaltwasser1, F K Horn, J Kremers, A Juenemann, A Bergua.   

Abstract

We present the case of a 59-year-old male patient with progressive vision impairment and consecutive visual field narrowing ("tunnel view") for 7 years and a known retinitis pigmentosa for 5 years. The remaining Goldmann perimetric visual field at time reported was less than 5°. A request for blindness-related social benefits was rejected because an ophthalmologic expert assessment suggested malingering. This prompted us to assess an objective determination of the visual field using multifocal VEPs. Objective visual field recordings were performed with a four-channel multifocal VEP-perimeter using 58 stimulus fields (pattern reversal dartboard stimulus configuration). The correlated signal data were processed using an off-line method. At each field, the recording from the channel with the maximal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was retained, thus resulting in an SNR optimized virtual recording. Analysis of VEP signals was performed for each single field and concentric rings and compared to an average response measured in five healthy subjects. Substantial VEP responses could be identified in three fields within the innermost ring (eccentricity, 1.7°) for both eyes, although SNR was generally low. More eccentric stimuli did not elicit reliable VEP responses. The mfVEP recording was correlated with perimetric visual field data. The current SNR optimization by using the channel with the largest SNR provides a good method to extract useful data from recordings and may be appropriate for the use in forensic ophthalmology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21842405     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-011-9283-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  9 in total

1.  Objective perimetry in glaucoma.

Authors:  A Klistorner; S L Graham
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Quantifying the benefits of additional channels of multifocal VEP recording.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Xian Zhang; Jenny E Hong; Candice S Chen
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Visual evoked potentials standard (2004).

Authors:  J Vernon Odom; Michael Bach; Colin Barber; Mitchell Brigell; Michael F Marmor; Alma Patrizia Tormene; Graham E Holder
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Clinical application of objective perimetry using multifocal visual evoked potentials in glaucoma practice.

Authors:  Stuart L Graham; Alexander I Klistorner; Ivan Goldberg
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-06

Review 5.  [Legal aspects of ophthalmological expert assessment].

Authors:  F Tost; C Gass
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 0.700

Review 6.  [Legal aspects in ophthalmological expert assessment: part I].

Authors:  F Tost; C Gass
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.700

7.  The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field.

Authors:  H A Baseler; E E Sutter; S A Klein; T Carney
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-01

8.  M and P components of the VEP and their visual field distribution.

Authors:  H A Baseler; E E Sutter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Discordance between subjective perimetric visual fields and objective multifocal visual evoked potential-determined visual fields in patients with hemianopsia.

Authors:  Ken Watanabe; Kei Shinoda; Itaru Kimura; Yukihiko Mashima; Yoshihisa Oguchi; Hisao Ohde
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 5.258

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Steady-state multifocal visual evoked potential (ssmfVEP) using dartboard stimulation as a possible tool for objective visual field assessment.

Authors:  Folkert K Horn; Franziska Selle; Bettina Hohberger; Jan Kremers
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  The importance of the electrophysiological tests in the early diagnosis of ganglion cells and/or optic nerve dysfunction coexisting with pituitary adenoma: an overview.

Authors:  Ewelina Lachowicz; Wojciech Lubiński
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.