Literature DB >> 21840720

Clinical and radiological outcomes of modified techniques in Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty.

Jun-Ming Cao1, Ying-Ze Zhang, Yong Shen, Jia-Xin Xu, Wen-Yuan Ding, Da-Long Yang, Di Zhang.   

Abstract

Kyphosis may occur after arthroplasty as the result of the disc insertion angle and overmilling; however, few studies have described techniques to avoid these factors. We investigated whether modified techniques of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty can prevent adverse outcomes. Twenty patients (control group) underwent surgery using techniques described in the Bryan disc product monograph (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Twenty-nine patients (investigation group) underwent surgery using a modified technique which included changes in disc insertion angle, reducing overmilling of the endplates, ensuring the anterior borders of the two halves of the prosthesis were at the same horizontal line, and accurately fitting the prosthesis. Disability and pain were assessed using self-administered questionnaires and the change in functional spinal unit (FSU) angle between the two groups was also compared. Both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvement compared with preoperative values for the following functional outcomes measures. The mean neck pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores before surgery were 73.45 (control) and 74.53 (investigation); at the 2-year follow-up these scores were 22.1 and 14.79 (p=0.0013), respectively. After surgery, 14 of 20 patients in the control group developed a tendency toward kyphosis of the FSU in the neutral position (range=-9°-13°, mean=-1.1°±5.05). Conversely, none of the 29 patients in the investigation group developed kyphosis of the FSU in the neutral position (range=0-10°, mean=3.79°±2.90) (p=0.0007). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding preoperative and postoperative scores with the exception of neck pain VAS and FSU angle changes. There were no intraoperative complications, vascular or neurologic complications, spontaneous fusions, or device failures or explantations. Crown
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21840720     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.01.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  6 in total

1.  Morphometry evaluations of cervical osseous endplates based on three dimensional reconstructions.

Authors:  Hang Feng; Haoxi Li; Zhaoyu Ba; Zhaoxiong Chen; Xinhua Li; Desheng Wu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Midterm outcomes of total cervical total disc replacement with Bryan prosthesis.

Authors:  Zhenxiang Zhang; Wei Zhu; Lixian Zhu; Yaqing Du
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-02-11

3.  The Correlation between Insertion Depth of Prodisc-C Artificial Disc and Postoperative Kyphotic Deformity: Clinical Importance of Insertion Depth of Artificial Disc.

Authors:  Do-Youl Lee; Se-Hoon Kim; Jung-Keun Suh; Tai-Hyoung Cho; Yong-Gu Chung
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2012-09-30

4.  Footprint mismatch of cervical disc prostheses with Chinese cervical anatomic dimensions.

Authors:  Liang Dong; Ming-Sheng Tan; Qin-Hua Yan; Ping Yi; Feng Yang; Xiang-Sheng Tang; Qing-Ying Hao
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Incidence and risk factors of axial symptoms after cervical disc arthroplasty: a minimum 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Jia Li; Gang Qiu; Jingchao Wei; Yanfen Qiu; Yonghui An; Yong Shen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Cervical disc arthroplasty: Pros and cons.

Authors:  Bradley Moatz; P Justin Tortolani
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-07-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.