Literature DB >> 21839446

Injectable bone-graft substitutes: current products, their characteristics and indications, and new developments.

Sune Larsson1, Gerjon Hannink.   

Abstract

More than a decade has passed since the first injectable bone substitutes were introduced for use in orthopaedic trauma, and over recent years the number of commercial products has increased dramatically. Despite the fact that these bone substitutes have been on the market for many years, knowledge amongst potential users on how and when they might be useful is still fairly limited. Most injectable bone substitutes belong to one of two major groups: by far the largest group contains products based on various calcium phosphate (CP) mixtures, whilst the smaller group consists of calcium sulphate (CS) compounds. Following mixing, the CP or CS paste can be injected into--for instance--a fracture space for augmentation as an alternative to bone graft, or around a screw for augmentation if the bone is weak. Within minutes an in situ process makes the substitute hard; the mechanical strength in compression resembles that of cancellous bone, whereas the strength in bending and shear is lower. Over time, CP products undergo remodelling through a cell-mediated process that seems to mimic the normal bone remodelling, whilst CS products are dissolved through a faster process that is not cell-mediated. For CP, a number of clinical studies have shown that it can be useful for augmentation of metaphyseal fractures when a space is present. Randomised studies have verified that CP works especially well in tibial plateau fractures when compared with conventional bone grafting. So far the number of clinical studies on CS products is very low. Development at present seems to be heading towards premixed or directly mixed products as well as new compounds that contain fibres or other components to enhance bending and shear strength. Products that are based on combinations of CP and CS are also being developed to combine the fast-dissolving CS with the stronger and more slowly remodelling CP. Injectable bone substitutes, and especially CS, have also been targeted as potentially good carriers for antibiotics and growth factors.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21839446     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  25 in total

1.  Design of an inorganic dual-paste apatite cement using cation exchange.

Authors:  Marc Bohner; Hanna Tiainen; Pascal Michel; Nicola Döbelin
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Ability of bone graft substitutes to support the osteoprogenitor cells: An in-vitro study.

Authors:  Ziad Dahabreh; Michalis Panteli; Ippokratis Pountos; Mark Howard; Peter Campbell; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 5.326

3.  The kinetics of remodeling of a calcium sulfate/calcium phosphate bioceramic.

Authors:  Roberto Civinini; Antonio Capone; Christian Carulli; Fabrizio Matassi; Lorenzo Nistri; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Setting time and formability of calcium phosphate cements prepared using modified dicalcium phosphate anhydrous powders.

Authors:  Takenori Sawamura; Yoichiro Mizutani; Masahiko Okuyama; Toshihiro Kasuga
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Aspects of postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head, treated by advanced core decompression.

Authors:  Andrea Lazik; Stefan Landgraeber; Tim Claßen; Oliver Kraff; Thomas C Lauenstein; Jens M Theysohn
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Autograft versus allograft reconstruction of acute tibial plateau fractures: a comparative study of complications and outcome.

Authors:  Abolfazl Bagherifard; Hassan Ghandhari; Mahmoud Jabalameli; Mohammad Rahbar; Hosseinali Hadi; Mehdi Moayedfar; Mohammadreza Minatour Sajadi; Alireza Karimpour
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-10-08

7.  Development of an injectable bioactive bone filler cement with hydrogen orthophosphate incorporated calcium sulfate.

Authors:  Sandhya Sony; S Suresh Babu; K V Nishad; Harikrishna Varma; Manoj Komath
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  A radiographic and clinical comparison of reamer-irrigator-aspirator versus iliac crest bone graft in ankle arthrodesis.

Authors:  Scott R Nodzo; Nathan B Kaplan; Donald W Hohman; Christopher A Ritter
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Biological evaluation of alginate-based hydrogels, with antimicrobial features by Ce(III) incorporation, as vehicles for a bone substitute.

Authors:  D S Morais; M A Rodrigues; M A Lopes; M J Coelho; A C Maurício; R Gomes; I Amorim; M P Ferraz; J D Santos; C M Botelho
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Evaluation of collagen/heparin coated TCP/HA granules for long-term delivery of BMP-2.

Authors:  Gerjon Hannink; Paul J Geutjes; Willeke F Daamen; Pieter Buma
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.