Literature DB >> 25258672

Ability of bone graft substitutes to support the osteoprogenitor cells: An in-vitro study.

Ziad Dahabreh1, Michalis Panteli1, Ippokratis Pountos1, Mark Howard1, Peter Campbell1, Peter V Giannoudis1.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare seven commercially available bone graft substitutes (BGS) in terms of these properties and without using any additional biological growth factors.
METHODS: Porcine osteoprogenitor cells were loaded on seven commercially available BGS and allowed to proliferate for one week followed by osteogenic induction. Staining for live/dead cells as well as scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was carried out to determine viability and cellular binding. Further outcome measures included alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assays with normalisation for DNA content to quantify osteogenic potential. Negative and positive control experiments were carried out in parallel to validate the results.
RESULTS: Live/dead and SEM imaging showed higher viability and attachment with β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) than with other BGS (P < 0.05). The average ALP activity in nmol/mL (normalised value for DNA content in nmol/μg DNA) per sample was 657.58 (132.03) for β-TCP, 36.22 (unable to normalise) for calcium sulphate, 19.93 (11.39) for the Hydroxyapatite/Tricalcium Phosphate composite, 14.79 (18.53) for polygraft, 13.98 (8.15) for the highly porous β-Tricalcium Phosphate, 5.56 (10.0) for polymers, and 3.82 (3.8) for Hydroxyapatite.
CONCLUSION: Under the above experimental conditions, β-TCP was able to maintain better the viability of osteoprogenitor cells and allow proliferation and differentiation (P < 0.05).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone; Bone graft; Bone graft substitute; Fracture healing; Osteoprogenitor cells

Year:  2014        PMID: 25258672      PMCID: PMC4172679          DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v6.i4.497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Stem Cells        ISSN: 1948-0210            Impact factor:   5.326


  36 in total

Review 1.  Nonallograft osteoconductive bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  Robert W Bucholz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Engineering principles of clinical cell-based tissue engineering.

Authors:  George F Muschler; Chizu Nakamoto; Linda G Griffith
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Selective retention of bone marrow-derived cells to enhance spinal fusion.

Authors:  George F Muschler; Yoichi Matsukura; Hironori Nitto; Cynthia A Boehm; Antonio D Valdevit; Helen E Kambic; William J Davros; Kirk A Easley; Kimerly A Powell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  The use of bone-graft substitutes in large bone defects: any specific needs?

Authors:  G M Calori; E Mazza; M Colombo; C Ripamonti
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 5.  Injectable bone marrow preparations to stimulate osteogenic repair.

Authors:  J F Connolly
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Growth kinetics, self-renewal, and the osteogenic potential of purified human mesenchymal stem cells during extensive subcultivation and following cryopreservation.

Authors:  S P Bruder; N Jaiswal; S E Haynesworth
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.429

7.  Bone formation in vitro by stromal cells obtained from bone marrow of young adult rats.

Authors:  C Maniatopoulos; J Sodek; A H Melcher
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.249

8.  The effect of bone morphogenetic protein-2, bone morphogenetic protein-7, parathyroid hormone, and platelet-derived growth factor on the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells derived from osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  Ippokratis Pountos; Theodora Georgouli; Karen Henshaw; Howard Bird; Elena Jones; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Percutaneous bone marrow grafting of delayed union and nonunion in cancer patients.

Authors:  J H Healey; P A Zimmerman; J M McDonnell; J M Lane
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Effect of vascular endothelial growth factor 165 gene transfection on bone defects and its mRNA expression in rabbits.

Authors:  Dong-mei Zhao; Hai-bin Wang; Jia-Feng Yang; Shi-qing Wu; Jun-li Liu; Fu-yu Xu; Li-ping Qiu; Jing-long Cai
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.628

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The role of peptides in bone healing and regeneration: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ippokratis Pountos; Michalis Panteli; Anastasios Lampropoulos; Elena Jones; Giorgio Maria Calori; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 2.  Bioactive hydrogels for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Xin Bai; Mingzhu Gao; Sahla Syed; Jerry Zhuang; Xiaoyang Xu; Xue-Qing Zhang
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2018-05-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.