Literature DB >> 26093539

Aspects of postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head, treated by advanced core decompression.

Andrea Lazik1, Stefan Landgraeber, Tim Claßen, Oliver Kraff, Thomas C Lauenstein, Jens M Theysohn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze remodeling processes after advanced core decompression (ACD) in patients with avascular femoral head necrosis by means of 3T MRI and to identify indicators for clinical outcome considering the defect size and characteristics of the bone graft and of the neighboring regeneration tissue.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four hips, with preexisting preoperative MRIs in 21 cases, were examined 1-34 months (mean 12.7) postoperatively by 3T MRI. The volume of necrosis was measured manually pre- and postoperatively to calculate absolute as well as percentage necrosis reduction. The signal intensity of the bone graft was quantified using a 4-point scale. Border phenomena between the bone graft and bone were described and classified into groups. Wilcoxon sign-rank test was used to identify correlations between the analyzed items and clinical signs of femoral head collapse after a mean follow-up time of 28.6 months (10.4-46.8).
RESULTS: Mean percentage reduction of necrosis was significantly higher in asymptomatic patients (59.36%) compared to patients with signs of femoral head collapse (28.78%, p = 0.008). Signal intensity of the bone graft increased in T1w and T2w TIRM sequences over time after surgery and was significantly higher in asymptomatic patients. Five border phenomena between the bone graft and healthy bone were identified. Among them, the so-called "rail sign" representing three layers of remodeling tissue correlated with the histological observations.
CONCLUSION: A variety of border phenomena representing remodeling processes have been described using 3T MRI. Beneath the percentage amount of necrosis reduction, we identified the signal intensity of the bone graft as an indicator for clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26093539     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-015-2192-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  20 in total

1.  Geometric analysis of an expandable reamer for treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Stefan Landgraeber; Thanh Ngoc Tran; Tim Claßen; Sebastian Warwas; Jens Theysohn; Andrea Lazik; Marcus Jäger; Wojciech Kowalczyk
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Chemical-shift MR imaging of the femoral head: an in vitro study of normal hips and hips with avascular necrosis.

Authors:  D G Mitchell; P M Joseph; M Fallon; W Hickey; H Y Kressel; V M Rao; M E Steinberg; M K Dalinka
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  MR findings of necrotic lesions and the extralesional area of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  T Sakai; N Sugano; T Nishii; K Haraguchi; T Ochi; K Ohzono
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Influence of the volume of osteonecrosis on the outcome of core decompression of the femoral head.

Authors:  B Mazières; F Marin; P Chiron; L Moulinier; J M Amigues; M Laroche; A Cantagrel
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  Which factors influence preservation of the osteonecrotic femoral head?

Authors:  Jay R Lieberman; Stephen M Engstrom; R Michael Meneghini; Nelson Fong SooHoo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  [Femoral head necrosis].

Authors:  J Kramer; G Scheurecker; A Scheurecker; A Stöger; A Huber; S Hofmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 7.  Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: evaluation and treatment.

Authors:  Charalampos G Zalavras; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Increased bone formation using calcium sulfate-calcium phosphate composite graft.

Authors:  Robert M Urban; Thomas M Turner; Deborah J Hall; Nozomu Inoue; Steven Gitelis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Histological comparison of autograft, allograft-DBM, xenograft, and synthetic grafts in a trabecular bone defect: an experimental study in rabbits.

Authors:  Vasilis T Athanasiou; Dionysios J Papachristou; Andreas Panagopoulos; Alkis Saridis; Chrisoula D Scopa; Panagiotis Megas
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2010-01

10.  The pathogenesis of nontraumatic osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Jesse Seamon; Thomas Keller; Jamal Saleh; Quanjun Cui
Journal:  Arthritis       Date:  2012-11-08
View more
  4 in total

1.  Deep Belief CNN Feature Representation Based Content Based Image Retrieval for Medical Images.

Authors:  Senthil Kumar Sundararajan; B Sankaragomathi; D Saravana Priya
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  The kinetics of remodeling of a calcium sulfate/calcium phosphate bioceramic.

Authors:  Roberto Civinini; Antonio Capone; Christian Carulli; Fabrizio Matassi; Lorenzo Nistri; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Dyslipidaemia for patients with low-energy femoral neck fractures after the treatment of cancellous screws: a retrospective study with a 3-year minimum follow-up.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Xiaoxiao Zhu; Genwang Pei; Ping Xu; Xianshang Zeng; Lili Zhang; Nan Zhang; Dan Zeng; Lei Cao; Weiguang Yu; Xinchao Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Modifications to advanced Core decompression for treatment of Avascular necrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Stefan Landgraeber; Sebastian Warwas; Tim Claßen; Marcus Jäger
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.