Literature DB >> 17203916

Are investigators aware of environmental noise in animal facilities and that this noise may affect experimental data?

Ann L Baldwin1, Gary E Schwartz, Douglas H Hopp.   

Abstract

Control of environmental factors, such as noise, in animal facilities is important to ensure that research animals respond consistently to experimental procedures and that experimental results are not confounded by outside influences. A survey of personnel involved with animal facilities (173 respondents) showed that almost all agreed with this statement. However, 48% thought that one or more environmental factors in their facilities could be stressing the animals, and a majority of respondents reported generation of audible noise from people (72% of respondents), fans (61%), and squeaky carts (56%). The presence of these noises was correlated with the perception of noise as a problem because of its psychologic and physiologic effects on the animals. The amount of time respondents spent in the facilities was strongly correlated with their perception of noise as a problem, with veterinarians spending the most time and perceiving the most problems, and professors and assistant/ associate professors spending the least and perceiving the fewest. Therefore, they may lack key knowledge that can affect their research goals. In addition, because faculty are the least aware of noise as a potential problem but are primarily responsible for designing experiments, research involving animals may be confounded by noise as an unknown variable. This effect may lead to unnecessary numbers of animals being required to achieve statistical significance and possibly to erroneous interpretation of results. On the basis of the findings of this survey, we present recommendations for improving the environment, particularly for decreasing the noise level, in animal facilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17203916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  8 in total

1.  An effective, economical method of reducing environmental noise in the vivarium.

Authors:  Maggie T Young; Alan L French; Jeffrey W Clymer
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Locomotor effects of a low-frequency fire alarm on C57BL/6 male mice: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Jessica M Povroznik; Robert E Faith; Matthew J Kessler; Frank N Ali; James Kosik; Stephen Prince; Elizabeth B Engler-Chiurazzi
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 2.471

3.  Construction noise decreases reproductive efficiency in mice.

Authors:  Skye Rasmussen; Gary Glickman; Rada Norinsky; Fred W Quimby; Ravi J Tolwani
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 4.  Environmental Aspects of Domestic Cat Care and Management: Implications for Cat Welfare.

Authors:  Judith L Stella; Candace C Croney
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2016-09-28

5.  The Impact of Acute Loud Noise on the Behavior of Laboratory Birds.

Authors:  Tayanne L Corbani; Jessica E Martin; Susan D Healy
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-01-06

6.  Casting the Net Widely for Change in Animal Welfare: The Plight of Birds in Zoos, Ex Situ Conservation, and Conservation Fieldwork.

Authors:  Gisela Kaplan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Remarkable changes in behavior and physiology of laboratory mice after the massive 2011 Tohoku earthquake in Japan.

Authors:  Shuichi Yanai; Yuki Semba; Shogo Endo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Can animal data translate to innovations necessary for a new era of patient-centred and individualised healthcare? Bias in preclinical animal research.

Authors:  Susan Bridgwood Green
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 2.652

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.