| Literature DB >> 21838914 |
Terue Kawabata1, Satoko Hirota, Tomoko Hirayama, Naoko Adachi, Yoshinori Kaneko, Noriko Iwama, Keiko Kamachi, Eiji Araki, Hiroshi Kawashima, Yoshinobu Kiso.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We reported that the compositions of arachidonic acid (ARA) in erythrocytes and plasma phospholipids (PL) in the elderly were lower than those in the young, though the ARA intake was nearly identical.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21838914 PMCID: PMC3169479 DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-10-138
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Spearman's correlation coefficients between dietary EPA, DHA and ARA intake and the corresponding FA composition of plasma TG, EC, and PL and erythrocyte PL in YM-G, YW-G, EM-G, EW-G, and ALL-G
| Plasma TG | Plasma EC | Plasma PL | Erythrocyte PL | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20:5n-3 (EPA) | YM-G | 0.617 | ** | 0.611 | ** | 0.665 | ** | 0.693 | ** |
| YW-G | 0.188 | 0.457 | * | 0.407 | * | 0.829 | *** | ||
| EM-G | 0.770 | *** | 0.691 | *** | 0.840 | *** | 0.905 | *** | |
| EW-G | 0.599 | *** | 0.404 | * | 0.692 | *** | 0.604 | *** | |
| All-G | 0.658 | *** | 0.654 | *** | 0.704 | *** | 0.852 | *** | |
| 22:6n-3 (DHA) | YM-G | 0.392 | 0.326 | 0.571 | ** | 0.284 | |||
| YW-G | 0.276 | 0.408 | * | 0.608 | *** | 0.500 | ** | ||
| EM-G | 0.703 | *** | 0.550 | ** | 0.476 | * | 0.112 | ||
| EW-G | 0.207 | 0.186 | 0.220 | 0.281 | |||||
| All-G | 0.508 | *** | 0.631 | *** | 0.381 | *** | 0.446 | *** | |
| 20:4n-6 (ARA) | YM-G | -0.269 | -0.313 | -0.253 | -0.095 | ||||
| YW-G | 0.166 | 0.248 | 0.199 | -0.047 | |||||
| EM-G | 0.193 | -0.015 | 0.016 | 0.053 | |||||
| EW-G | -0.035 | 0.186 | 0.087 | -0.181 | |||||
| All-G | 0.012 | -0.046 | -0.085 | -0.238 | * | ||||
Abbreviations: FA, fatty acids; TG, triacylglycerol; EC, esterified cholesterol; PL, phospholipids; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; ARA, arachidonic acid; YM-G, young men group; YW-G, young women group; EM-G, elderly men group; EW-G, elderly women group, All-G, all subjects group.
*P < 0.05;**P < 0.01;***P < 0.001.
Spearman's correlation coefficients between dietary EPA and DHA intake and ARA composition of plasma TG, EC, and PL and erythrocyte PL in YM-G, YW-G, EM-G, EW-G, and ALL-G
| ARA compositions | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma TG | Plasma EC | Plasma PL | Erythrocyte PL | ||||||
| Dietary intakes | |||||||||
| 20:5n-3 (EPA) | YM-G | 0.114 | -0.189 | -0.186 | -0.633 | ** | |||
| YW-G | 0.146 | -0.285 | -0.344 | -0.677 | *** | ||||
| EM-G | 0.545 | ** | -0.046 | -0.265 | -0.505 | * | |||
| EW-G | 0.003 | -0.084 | -0.103 | -0.503 | ** | ||||
| All-G | -0.203 | * | -0.436 | *** | -0.610 | *** | -0.815 | *** | |
| 22:6n-3 (DHA) | YM-G | 0.030 | -0.223 | -0.244 | -0.618 | ** | |||
| YW-G | 0.193 | -0.191 | -0.297 | -0.599 | *** | ||||
| EM-G | 0.542 | ** | 0.046 | -0.129 | -0.545 | ** | |||
| EW-G | -0.060 | -0.143 | -0.172 | -0.534 | ** | ||||
| All-G | -0.187 | -0.410 | *** | -0.595 | *** | -0.811 | *** | ||
Abbreviations: TG, triacylglycerol; EC, esterified cholesterol; PL, phospholipids; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; ARA, arachidonic acid; YM-G, young men group; YW-G, young women group; EM-G, elderly men group; EW-G, elderly women group; All-G, all subjects group.
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 1Scatter plot between dietary EPA+DHA intake and ARA compositions in erythrocyte PL. Scatter plot between dietary eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) + docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) intake and arachidonic acid (ARA) compositions in erythrocyte phospholipids (PL) in the young men group (YM-G), young women group (YW-G), elderly men group (EM-G), and elderly women group (EW-G). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
The mean and SEM of EPA+DHA and ARA intakes and ARA composition in erythrocyte PL among YM-G, YW-G, EM-G, and EW-G
| Dietary intakes | Erythrocyte ARA compositions | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPA+DHA | ARA | Crude | Adjusted | 95% confidence limits | |||||||
| YM-G | Mean | 0.27 | 0.15 | 12.8 | 12.1 | 11.6 | 12.6 | ||||
| SEM | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.3 | 0.2 | |||||||
| YW-G | Mean | 0.41 | 0.14 | 12.4 | 12.0 | 11.7 | 12.4 | ||||
| SEM | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0.2 | |||||||
| EM-G | Mean | 0.90 | 0.17 | 9.8 | 10.6 | 10.1 | 11.0 | ||||
| SEM | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0.2 | |||||||
| EW-G | Mean | 0.75 | 0.15 | 10.0 | 10.3 | 10.0 | 10.7 | ||||
| SEM | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0.2 | |||||||
Abbreviations: EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; ARA, arachidonic acid; PL, phospholipids; YM-G, young men group; YW-G, young women group; EM-G, elderly men group; EW-G, elderly women group.
Significant differences on one-way ANOVA, post ad hoc Bonferroni. : different from YM-G, p < 0.001, : different from YW-G, p < 0.001 : different from YW-G, p < 0.05
The mean and standard error of the mean (SEM) of adjusted erythrocyte ARA compositions were calculated based on the least squares method by the ANCOVA model. The covariate of this model was estimated from data in which EPA+DHA intake was 0.59 g/d.