Literature DB >> 21837134

Ammonium O,O'-diethyl dithio-phosphate.

Andrzej Okuniewski1, Barbara Becker.   

Abstract

In the title compound, NH(4) (+)·(C(2)H(5)O)(2)PS(2) (-), the ammonium cation is connected by four charge-assisted N-H⋯S hydrogen bonds to four tetra-hedral O,O'-diethyl dithio-phosphate anions, forming layers parallel to (100). The polar and non-polar constituents of the layers are stacked alternately along [100]. Inter-lacing of the external ethyl groups through van der Waals inter-actions combines these layers into a three-dimensional structure.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21837134      PMCID: PMC3151957          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related structures, see: Chekhlov et al. (1991 ▶); Chekhlov (2000 ▶). For applications of O,O′-diethyl dithio­phosphate in coordination chemistry, see: Cotero-Villegas et al. (2011 ▶). For the determination of various ions in analytical chemistry using O,O′-diethyl dithio­phosphates, see: Carletto et al. (2009 ▶); Maltez et al. (2008 ▶); Pozebon et al. (1998 ▶); Wu et al. (2006 ▶). For a description of the Cambridge Structural Database, see: Allen (2002 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

NH4C4H10O2PS2 M = 203.25 Monoclinic, a = 12.0274 (7) Å b = 7.2006 (3) Å c = 12.5690 (7) Å β = 110.305 (6)° V = 1020.89 (9) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.63 mm−1 T = 120 K 0.30 × 0.16 × 0.05 mm

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur diffractometer Absorption correction: analytical [CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2010 ▶) using a multi-faceted crystal model based on expressions derived by Clark & Reid (1995 ▶)] T min = 0.856, T max = 0.969 3955 measured reflections 2004 independent reflections 1579 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.023

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.035 wR(F 2) = 0.085 S = 1.01 2004 reflections 109 parameters 4 restraints H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.46 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.21 e Å−3 Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2010 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▶) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022811/wm2499sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022811/wm2499Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022811/wm2499Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
NH4+·C4H10O2PS2F(000) = 432
Mr = 203.25Dx = 1.322 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMelting point: 438(1) K
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 12.0274 (7) ÅCell parameters from 2402 reflections
b = 7.2006 (3) Åθ = 2.8–28.4°
c = 12.5690 (7) ŵ = 0.63 mm1
β = 110.305 (6)°T = 120 K
V = 1020.89 (9) Å3Plate, colourless
Z = 40.30 × 0.16 × 0.05 mm
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur diffractometer2004 independent reflections
graphite1579 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 8.1883 pixels mm-1Rint = 0.023
ω scansθmax = 26.0°, θmin = 3.3°
Absorption correction: analytical [CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2010) using a multi-faceted crystal model based on expressions derived by Clark & Reid (1995)]h = −14→12
Tmin = 0.856, Tmax = 0.969k = −8→8
3955 measured reflectionsl = −15→14
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.085H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.01w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0521P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2004 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
109 parametersΔρmax = 0.46 e Å3
4 restraintsΔρmin = −0.21 e Å3
Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.3199 (2)0.5211 (3)0.2964 (2)0.0326 (5)
H1A0.29820.49060.36350.039*
H1B0.2650.61790.25170.039*
C20.4451 (2)0.5890 (4)0.3330 (3)0.0511 (7)
H2A0.49840.4930.37830.077*
H2B0.45290.70180.37880.077*
H2C0.4660.61690.2660.077*
C30.3169 (2)0.0606 (4)0.3984 (2)0.0392 (6)
H3A0.3690.15810.44570.047*
H3B0.36−0.00220.35430.047*
C40.2849 (3)−0.0763 (4)0.4717 (2)0.0425 (7)
H4A0.2426−0.01290.51520.064*
H4B0.3572−0.13340.5240.064*
H4C0.234−0.17270.42420.064*
O10.31244 (13)0.35602 (19)0.22740 (13)0.0281 (4)
O20.20831 (13)0.1435 (2)0.32198 (12)0.0278 (4)
P10.20257 (5)0.21895 (8)0.20040 (5)0.02272 (16)
S10.23286 (5)0.02043 (8)0.10585 (5)0.03012 (17)
S20.04716 (5)0.34439 (8)0.13990 (4)0.02542 (16)
N10.0076 (2)0.3099 (3)0.38320 (17)0.0284 (4)
H1N−0.0563 (17)0.369 (4)0.385 (2)0.053 (8)*
H2N0.020 (2)0.333 (4)0.3191 (14)0.047 (8)*
H3N−0.010 (3)0.1909 (16)0.385 (2)0.052 (9)*
H4N0.0644 (18)0.357 (3)0.4414 (15)0.047 (8)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0318 (13)0.0262 (11)0.0376 (13)−0.0028 (10)0.0093 (10)−0.0092 (10)
C20.0360 (15)0.0437 (15)0.0672 (19)−0.0085 (13)0.0101 (14)−0.0231 (15)
C30.0281 (13)0.0406 (14)0.0387 (14)0.0043 (12)−0.0015 (11)0.0107 (12)
C40.0528 (17)0.0459 (15)0.0302 (13)0.0196 (14)0.0162 (12)0.0099 (12)
O10.0263 (8)0.0254 (8)0.0348 (8)−0.0061 (7)0.0133 (7)−0.0074 (7)
O20.0250 (8)0.0333 (8)0.0231 (7)0.0047 (7)0.0061 (6)0.0067 (7)
P10.0227 (3)0.0229 (3)0.0233 (3)−0.0008 (2)0.0088 (2)−0.0015 (2)
S10.0256 (3)0.0295 (3)0.0370 (3)−0.0010 (2)0.0131 (3)−0.0097 (3)
S20.0263 (3)0.0297 (3)0.0202 (3)0.0051 (2)0.0080 (2)0.0011 (2)
N10.0328 (12)0.0313 (12)0.0244 (10)0.0047 (10)0.0141 (9)0.0026 (9)
C1—O11.456 (3)C4—H4A0.98
C1—C21.495 (3)C4—H4B0.98
C1—H1A0.99C4—H4C0.98
C1—H1B0.99O1—P11.5888 (15)
C2—H2A0.98O2—P11.6005 (14)
C2—H2B0.98P1—S11.9720 (8)
C2—H2C0.98P1—S21.9753 (8)
C3—O21.454 (3)N1—H1N0.886 (10)
C3—C41.489 (3)N1—H2N0.884 (10)
C3—H3A0.99N1—H3N0.885 (10)
C3—H3B0.99N1—H4N0.879 (10)
O1—C1—C2107.3 (2)C3—C4—H4B109.5
O1—C1—H1A110.2H4A—C4—H4B109.5
C2—C1—H1A110.2C3—C4—H4C109.5
O1—C1—H1B110.2H4A—C4—H4C109.5
C2—C1—H1B110.2H4B—C4—H4C109.5
H1A—C1—H1B108.5C1—O1—P1120.63 (14)
C1—C2—H2A109.5C3—O2—P1120.07 (15)
C1—C2—H2B109.5O1—P1—O2104.47 (8)
H2A—C2—H2B109.5O1—P1—S1105.37 (6)
C1—C2—H2C109.5O2—P1—S1111.94 (6)
H2A—C2—H2C109.5O1—P1—S2113.83 (6)
H2B—C2—H2C109.5O2—P1—S2104.14 (6)
O2—C3—C4108.3 (2)S1—P1—S2116.59 (4)
O2—C3—H3A110H1N—N1—H2N111 (2)
C4—C3—H3A110H1N—N1—H3N104 (3)
O2—C3—H3B110H2N—N1—H3N109 (2)
C4—C3—H3B110H1N—N1—H4N103 (2)
H3A—C3—H3B108.4H2N—N1—H4N111 (3)
C3—C4—H4A109.5H3N—N1—H4N118 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···S1i0.89 (1)2.43 (1)3.310 (2)178 (3)
N1—H4N···S1ii0.88 (1)2.50 (1)3.377 (2)177 (2)
N1—H3N···S2iii0.89 (1)2.54 (1)3.409 (2)169 (2)
N1—H2N···S20.88 (1)2.39 (1)3.2633 (19)171 (2)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1N⋯S1i0.89 (1)2.43 (1)3.310 (2)178 (3)
N1—H4N⋯S1ii0.88 (1)2.50 (1)3.377 (2)177 (2)
N1—H3N⋯S2iii0.89 (1)2.54 (1)3.409 (2)169 (2)
N1—H2N⋯S20.88 (1)2.39 (1)3.2633 (19)171 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  6 in total

1.  The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising.

Authors:  Frank H Allen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2002-05-29

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Simple hollow fiber renewal liquid membrane extraction method for pre-concentration of Cd(II) in environmental samples and detection by flame atomic absorption spectrometry.

Authors:  Jeferson Schneider Carletto; Raquel Medeiros Luciano; Gizelle Cristina Bedendo; Eduardo Carasek
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 6.558

4.  Single drop micro-extraction with O,O-diethyl dithiophosphate for the determination of lead by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry.

Authors:  Heloísa França Maltez; Daniel L G Borges; Eduardo Carasek; Bernhard Welz; Adilson J Curtius
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 6.057

5.  Determination of arsenic(III) and arsenic(V) by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry after complexation and sorption on a C-18 bonded silica column.

Authors:  D Pozebon; V L Dressler; J A Gomes Neto; A J Curtius
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.057

6.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Origins of the enhanced affinity of RNA-protein interactions triggered by RNA phosphorodithioate backbone modification.

Authors:  Xianbin Yang; N Dinuka Abeydeera; Feng-Wu Liu; Martin Egli
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Cytotoxicity and effect of extraction methods on the chemical composition of essential oils of Moringa oleifera seeds.

Authors:  Rowland Monday Ojo Kayode; Anthony Jide Afolayan
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.066

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.