Literature DB >> 21837082

1,4-Bis[(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)meth-yl]benzene.

Gui-Ying Dong, Tong-Fei Liu, Cui-Huan Jiao, Xiao-Chen Deng, Xiao-Ge Shi.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(14)H(14)N(4), the center of the phenyl-ene group is a crystallographic center of inversion. The compound is composed of three aromatic rings displaying a Z-like conformation. The dihedral angle between the pyrazole rings and the central phenyl ring is 83.84 (9)°.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21837082      PMCID: PMC3151929          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background and coordination compounds with related ligands, see: Chang et al. (1993 ▶); Hou et al. (2010 ▶); Liu et al. (2011 ▶). For the crystal structure of the title compound with two solvent water mol­ecules, see: Shi et al. (2009 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C14H14N4 M = 238.29 Monoclinic, a = 5.6088 (8) Å b = 6.8183 (10) Å c = 16.526 (3) Å β = 97.900 (15)° V = 626.01 (17) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.08 mm−1 T = 295 K 0.20 × 0.20 × 0.19 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.956, T max = 0.996 2464 measured reflections 1109 independent reflections 580 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.033

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.033 wR(F 2) = 0.064 S = 0.80 1109 reflections 83 parameters 1 restraint H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.10 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.11 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1998 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022537/im2296sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022537/im2296Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022537/im2296Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C14H14N4F(000) = 252
Mr = 238.29Dx = 1.264 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 1865 reflections
a = 5.6088 (8) Åθ = 5.3–24.1°
b = 6.8183 (10) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
c = 16.526 (3) ÅT = 295 K
β = 97.900 (15)°Block, colourless
V = 626.01 (17) Å30.20 × 0.20 × 0.19 mm
Z = 2
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer1109 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine–focus sealed tube580 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.033
φ and ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 3.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −6→6
Tmin = 0.956, Tmax = 0.996k = −6→8
2464 measured reflectionsl = −19→19
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.064w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0265P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 0.80(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1109 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.10 e Å3
83 parametersΔρmin = −0.11 e Å3
1 restraintExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.043 (3)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N20.3304 (2)0.6599 (2)0.19489 (8)0.0484 (4)
N10.1491 (2)0.76019 (19)0.15110 (8)0.0450 (4)
C20.3728 (3)0.8298 (3)0.00568 (11)0.0536 (5)
H2B0.28800.71350.00880.064*
C70.2330 (3)0.4880 (3)0.20879 (10)0.0502 (5)
H7A0.31570.38620.23780.060*
C10.5185 (3)0.8528 (2)−0.05491 (11)0.0525 (5)
H1A0.52940.7517−0.09200.063*
C30.3522 (3)0.9770 (3)0.06120 (10)0.0436 (4)
C6−0.0531 (3)0.6553 (3)0.13893 (11)0.0555 (5)
H6A−0.19980.69590.11080.067*
C40.1899 (3)0.9606 (2)0.12664 (11)0.0562 (5)
H4A0.26061.03400.17420.067*
H4B0.03601.02030.10680.067*
C5−0.0058 (3)0.4783 (3)0.17507 (12)0.0588 (5)
H5A−0.11110.37350.17670.071*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N20.0428 (8)0.0432 (10)0.0573 (10)0.0048 (8)0.0001 (7)0.0053 (8)
N10.0420 (8)0.0448 (9)0.0484 (9)0.0056 (8)0.0074 (7)0.0057 (8)
C20.0598 (11)0.0468 (12)0.0558 (12)−0.0024 (9)0.0134 (10)0.0014 (11)
C70.0593 (13)0.0408 (12)0.0504 (12)0.0055 (10)0.0072 (10)0.0036 (10)
C10.0626 (11)0.0460 (12)0.0490 (12)0.0036 (10)0.0076 (10)−0.0051 (10)
C30.0454 (10)0.0443 (11)0.0413 (11)0.0087 (9)0.0067 (8)0.0027 (10)
C60.0352 (10)0.0744 (15)0.0559 (12)0.0007 (11)0.0025 (8)−0.0021 (12)
C40.0635 (11)0.0458 (12)0.0614 (13)0.0138 (9)0.0165 (10)0.0119 (10)
C50.0551 (13)0.0566 (14)0.0653 (13)−0.0144 (10)0.0100 (11)−0.0042 (12)
N2—C71.3264 (19)C1—C3i1.380 (2)
N2—N11.3504 (16)C1—H1A0.9300
N1—C61.3324 (18)C3—C1i1.380 (2)
N1—C41.4518 (19)C3—C41.511 (2)
C2—C31.375 (2)C6—C51.356 (2)
C2—C11.386 (2)C6—H6A0.9300
C2—H2B0.9300C4—H4A0.9700
C7—C51.380 (2)C4—H4B0.9700
C7—H7A0.9300C5—H5A0.9300
C7—N2—N1104.04 (12)C2—C3—C4122.52 (16)
N2—N1—C6111.81 (13)C1i—C3—C4119.39 (16)
N2—N1—C4119.33 (14)N1—C6—C5107.47 (15)
C6—N1—C4128.81 (16)N1—C6—H6A126.3
C3—C2—C1120.76 (16)C5—C6—H6A126.3
C3—C2—H2B119.6N1—C4—C3113.74 (14)
C1—C2—H2B119.6N1—C4—H4A108.8
N2—C7—C5111.86 (16)C3—C4—H4A108.8
N2—C7—H7A124.1N1—C4—H4B108.8
C5—C7—H7A124.1C3—C4—H4B108.8
C3i—C1—C2121.18 (16)H4A—C4—H4B107.7
C3i—C1—H1A119.4C6—C5—C7104.82 (16)
C2—C1—H1A119.4C6—C5—H5A127.6
C2—C3—C1i118.07 (15)C7—C5—H5A127.6
  3 in total

1.  Reaction controlled assemblies of polyoxotungstates (-molybdates) and coordination polymers.

Authors:  Guangfeng Hou; Lihua Bi; Bao Li; Lixin Wu
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 5.165

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  1,4-Bis[(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)meth-yl]benzene dihydrate.

Authors:  Ai-E Shi; Yan-Jun Hou; Yi-Ming Zhang; Guang-Feng Hou; Jin-Sheng Gao
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-03-06
  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Crystal structure of ethyl 4-[(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)meth-yl]benzoate.

Authors:  Ju-Xian Wang; Chao Feng
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2014-11-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.