Literature DB >> 21836886

Diaqua-bis-(1H-imidazole-4-carboxyl-ato-κN,O)zinc.

Wenlin Shuai, Songliang Cai, Shengrun Zheng.   

Abstract

In the title compound, [Zn(C(4)H(3)N(2)O(2))(2)(H(2)O)(2)], the Zn(II) ion is situated on a twofold rotation axis and exhibits a distorted octa-hedral coordination configuration. The equatorial plane contains two cis-oriented bidentate 1H-imidazole-4-carboxyl-ate ligands and the axial positions are occupied by two coordinated water mol-ecules. In the crystal structure, inter-molecular O-H⋯O and N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds link the mol-ecules into a three-dimensional supra-molecular network. There are π-π inter-actions between the imidazole rings, with a centroid-to-centroid distance of 3.504 (3) Å.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21836886      PMCID: PMC3151991          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811020800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background, see: Yin et al. (2009 ▶); Zheng et al. (2011) ▶; Alkordi et al. (2009 ▶); Lu et al. (2009 ▶). For related structures, see: Haggag (2005 ▶); Starosta & Leciejewicz (2006 ▶); Gryz et al. (2007 ▶); Yin et al. (2009 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Zn(C4H3N2O2)2(H2O)2] M = 323.57 Orthorhombic, a = 7.1399 (19) Å b = 11.757 (3) Å c = 13.508 (4) Å V = 1133.9 (5) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 2.20 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.35 × 0.32 × 0.30 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.513, T max = 0.558 5336 measured reflections 1037 independent reflections 913 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.021

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.023 wR(F 2) = 0.066 S = 1.08 1037 reflections 95 parameters 2 restraints H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.33 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004 ▶); cell refinement: APEX2; data reduction: APEX2; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811020800/cv5098sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811020800/cv5098Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Zn(C4H3N2O2)2(H2O)2]Dx = 1.895 Mg m3
Mr = 323.57Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, PccnCell parameters from 2272 reflections
a = 7.1399 (19) Åθ = 3.3–27.3°
b = 11.757 (3) ŵ = 2.20 mm1
c = 13.508 (4) ÅT = 298 K
V = 1133.9 (5) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.35 × 0.32 × 0.30 mm
F(000) = 656
Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer1037 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube913 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.021
φ and ω scansθmax = 25.2°, θmin = 3.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −7→8
Tmin = 0.513, Tmax = 0.558k = −8→14
5336 measured reflectionsl = −14→16
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.023Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.066H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.08w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0338P)2 + 0.618P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1037 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
95 parametersΔρmax = 0.29 e Å3
2 restraintsΔρmin = −0.33 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Zn11.25000.75000.37215 (2)0.02665 (15)
N11.0565 (2)0.81059 (14)0.47393 (11)0.0263 (4)
N20.8608 (2)0.87069 (15)0.58685 (12)0.0318 (4)
H20.81230.88360.64400.038*
C20.9100 (3)0.86538 (16)0.42860 (13)0.0229 (4)
C10.9084 (3)0.87026 (16)0.31884 (14)0.0229 (4)
C30.7885 (3)0.90319 (19)0.49823 (15)0.0291 (4)
H30.67810.94330.48750.035*
C41.0207 (3)0.81514 (18)0.56937 (14)0.0322 (5)
H41.09660.78380.61820.039*
O11.04760 (19)0.82909 (12)0.27495 (9)0.0304 (3)
O20.76821 (19)0.91520 (13)0.27745 (10)0.0303 (4)
O1W1.0979 (2)0.59370 (14)0.34656 (12)0.0356 (4)
H1WA1.150 (4)0.550 (2)0.3077 (18)0.062 (9)*
H1WB0.989 (3)0.595 (3)0.328 (2)0.072 (10)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Zn10.0242 (2)0.0358 (2)0.0200 (2)0.00824 (13)0.0000.000
N10.0267 (9)0.0336 (10)0.0187 (8)0.0059 (7)0.0010 (7)0.0021 (7)
N20.0338 (10)0.0426 (11)0.0189 (8)0.0024 (8)0.0070 (7)−0.0012 (7)
C20.0220 (10)0.0252 (10)0.0214 (10)0.0008 (8)0.0003 (8)0.0002 (8)
C10.0246 (10)0.0238 (10)0.0205 (9)−0.0028 (8)−0.0016 (8)0.0009 (8)
C30.0254 (10)0.0344 (11)0.0275 (11)0.0040 (9)0.0007 (9)−0.0018 (9)
C40.0344 (12)0.0421 (13)0.0203 (10)0.0044 (9)−0.0009 (9)0.0046 (9)
O10.0283 (8)0.0434 (9)0.0194 (7)0.0063 (6)0.0021 (6)−0.0011 (6)
O20.0249 (8)0.0433 (9)0.0227 (7)0.0044 (6)−0.0045 (6)0.0051 (6)
O1W0.0264 (8)0.0386 (9)0.0417 (9)0.0049 (7)−0.0033 (7)−0.0108 (7)
Zn1—N12.0751 (16)N2—H20.8600
Zn1—N1i2.0751 (16)C2—C31.354 (3)
Zn1—O12.1626 (14)C2—C11.484 (3)
Zn1—O1i2.1626 (14)C1—O11.255 (2)
Zn1—O1Wi2.1623 (17)C1—O21.262 (2)
Zn1—O1W2.1623 (17)C3—H30.9300
N1—C41.315 (2)C4—H40.9300
N1—C21.373 (2)O1W—H1WA0.828 (17)
N2—C41.336 (3)O1W—H1WB0.818 (18)
N2—C31.358 (3)
N1—Zn1—N1i97.01 (9)C4—N2—H2126.1
N1—Zn1—O179.04 (6)C3—N2—H2126.1
N1i—Zn1—O1174.10 (5)C3—C2—N1109.40 (16)
N1—Zn1—O1i174.10 (5)C3—C2—C1132.55 (17)
N1i—Zn1—O1i79.04 (6)N1—C2—C1118.02 (15)
O1—Zn1—O1i105.24 (7)O1—C1—O2125.47 (17)
N1—Zn1—O1Wi98.53 (7)O1—C1—C2116.81 (15)
N1i—Zn1—O1Wi93.64 (7)O2—C1—C2117.71 (16)
O1—Zn1—O1Wi82.71 (6)C2—C3—N2106.05 (18)
O1i—Zn1—O1Wi86.15 (6)C2—C3—H3127.0
N1—Zn1—O1W93.64 (7)N2—C3—H3127.0
N1i—Zn1—O1W98.54 (7)N1—C4—N2111.05 (18)
O1—Zn1—O1W86.15 (6)N1—C4—H4124.5
O1i—Zn1—O1W82.71 (6)N2—C4—H4124.5
O1Wi—Zn1—O1W161.60 (9)C1—O1—Zn1114.11 (11)
C4—N1—C2105.65 (16)Zn1—O1W—H1WA114 (2)
C4—N1—Zn1142.45 (15)Zn1—O1W—H1WB121 (2)
C2—N1—Zn1111.89 (12)H1WA—O1W—H1WB104 (3)
C4—N2—C3107.84 (17)
N1i—Zn1—N1—C4−5.0 (2)C3—C2—C1—O2−1.8 (3)
O1—Zn1—N1—C4179.4 (3)N1—C2—C1—O2176.18 (18)
O1i—Zn1—N1—C442.6 (7)N1—C2—C3—N2−0.3 (2)
O1Wi—Zn1—N1—C4−99.8 (2)C1—C2—C3—N2177.80 (19)
O1W—Zn1—N1—C494.1 (3)C4—N2—C3—C20.0 (2)
N1i—Zn1—N1—C2175.82 (16)C2—N1—C4—N2−0.6 (2)
O1—Zn1—N1—C20.25 (13)Zn1—N1—C4—N2−179.84 (17)
O1i—Zn1—N1—C2−136.6 (5)C3—N2—C4—N10.4 (3)
O1Wi—Zn1—N1—C281.05 (14)O2—C1—O1—Zn1−176.15 (15)
O1W—Zn1—N1—C2−85.11 (14)C2—C1—O1—Zn13.9 (2)
C4—N1—C2—C30.6 (2)N1—Zn1—O1—C1−2.39 (14)
Zn1—N1—C2—C3−179.92 (14)N1i—Zn1—O1—C1−50.7 (6)
C4—N1—C2—C1−177.86 (17)O1i—Zn1—O1—C1173.43 (15)
Zn1—N1—C2—C11.6 (2)O1Wi—Zn1—O1—C1−102.60 (14)
C3—C2—C1—O1178.1 (2)O1W—Zn1—O1—C192.07 (14)
N1—C2—C1—O1−3.9 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2···O2ii0.861.932.784 (2)174.
O1W—H1WA···O2iii0.83 (2)2.04 (2)2.850 (2)167 (3)
O1W—H1WB···O2iv0.82 (2)1.96 (2)2.778 (2)175 (3)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯O2i0.861.932.784 (2)174
O1W—H1WA⋯O2ii0.83 (2)2.04 (2)2.850 (2)167 (3)
O1W—H1WB⋯O2iii0.82 (2)1.96 (2)2.778 (2)175 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Three-dimensional lanthanide anionic metal-organic frameworks with tunable luminescent properties induced by cation exchange.

Authors:  Wen-Guan Lu; Long Jiang; Xiao-Long Feng; Tong-Bu Lu
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  Zeolite-like metal-organic frameworks (ZMOFs) based on the directed assembly of finite metal-organic cubes (MOCs).

Authors:  Mohamed H Alkordi; Jacilynn A Brant; Lukasz Wojtas; Victor Ch Kravtsov; Amy J Cairns; Mohamed Eddaoudi
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 15.419

  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  1H-Imidazol-3-ium-4-carboxyl-ate.

Authors:  Qiang Cao; Bao-Rong Duan; Bin Zhu; Zhen Cao
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-12-17

2.  Structural characterization of two tetra-chlorido-zincate salts of 4-carb-oxy-1H-imidazol-3-ium: a salt hydrate and a co-crystal salt hydrate.

Authors:  Sean J Martens; David K Geiger
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2017-01-13

3.  Diaqua-bis-(1H-imidazole-4-carboxyl-ato-κ(2)N(3),O)cobalt(II).

Authors:  Wen-Sen Chen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-09-08

4.  Diaqua-bis-(1H-imidazole-4-carboxyl-ato-κ(2) N (3),O (4))manganese(II).

Authors:  Zhi-Yong Xiong; Lin Li; Xiang-Jie Zhao; Hai-Ming Chen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2013-02-28

5.  Diaqua-bis-(1H-imidazole-4-carboxyl-ato-κ(2)N(3),O)cobalt(II).

Authors:  Beñat Artetxe; Leire San Felices; Aroa Pache; Santiago Reinoso; Juan M Gutiérrez-Zorrilla
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2013-01-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.