Literature DB >> 22259422

1H-Imidazol-3-ium-4-carboxyl-ate.

Qiang Cao, Bao-Rong Duan, Bin Zhu, Zhen Cao.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(4)H(4)N(2)O(2), both imidazole N atoms are protonated and carboxyl-ate group is deprotonated, resulting in a zwitterion. The mol-ecule is essentially planar, with an r.m.s. deviation of 0.012 (1) Å. In the crystal, N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds and π-π stacking inter-actions [centroid-centroid distance = 3.674 (2) Å] between the imidazole rings link the mol-ecules into a three-dimensional supra-molecular network.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22259422      PMCID: PMC3254480          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811052998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background to the construction of coordination polymers based on 1H-imidazole-4,5-dicarb­oxy­lic acid, see: Alkordi, Liu et al. (2008 ▶); Alkordi, Brant et al. (2009 ▶); Gu et al. (2010 ▶); Lu et al. (2006 ▶); Nouar et al. (2009 ▶); Wang et al. (2010 ▶). For related complexes with 1H-imidazole-4-carb­oxy­lic acid, see: Haggag (2005 ▶); Starosta & Leciejewicz (2006 ▶); Gryz et al. (2007 ▶); Yin et al. (2009 ▶); Shuai et al. (2011 ▶); Zheng et al. (2011 ▶). For the synthesis of 1H-imidazole-4-carb­oxy­lic acid, see: Davis et al. (1982 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C4H4N2O2 M = 112.09 Orthorhombic, a = 10.474 (6) Å b = 11.676 (7) Å c = 3.674 (2) Å V = 449.3 (5) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.14 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.25 × 0.21 × 0.18 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.967, T max = 0.976 2280 measured reflections 510 independent reflections 480 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.023

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.029 wR(F 2) = 0.083 S = 1.10 510 reflections 73 parameters 1 restraint H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.12 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.19 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2008 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811052998/ld2040sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811052998/ld2040Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811052998/ld2040Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C4H4N2O2F(000) = 232
Mr = 112.09Dx = 1.657 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Pna21Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2c -2nCell parameters from 1380 reflections
a = 10.474 (6) Åθ = 2.6–27.0°
b = 11.676 (7) ŵ = 0.14 mm1
c = 3.674 (2) ÅT = 298 K
V = 449.3 (5) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.25 × 0.21 × 0.18 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer510 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube480 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.023
phi and ω scansθmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −12→12
Tmin = 0.967, Tmax = 0.976k = −14→12
2280 measured reflectionsl = −4→4
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.083H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.10w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0578P)2 + 0.0406P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
510 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
73 parametersΔρmax = 0.12 e Å3
1 restraintΔρmin = −0.19 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C20.15183 (19)0.33109 (16)0.6250 (7)0.0265 (5)
C10.20900 (19)0.44287 (17)0.5153 (6)0.0268 (5)
N20.10851 (15)0.15065 (14)0.7501 (6)0.0302 (5)
H20.11490.07740.76600.036*
C40.0113 (2)0.21278 (18)0.8693 (7)0.0301 (5)
H4−0.06100.18440.98530.036*
O20.31910 (13)0.43682 (12)0.3734 (5)0.0361 (5)
O10.14526 (14)0.53104 (13)0.5736 (6)0.0367 (5)
N10.03417 (16)0.32279 (14)0.7956 (6)0.0284 (5)
H1−0.01580.37910.84560.034*
C30.1970 (2)0.22218 (17)0.5977 (7)0.0280 (5)
H30.27430.20030.49400.034*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C20.0254 (9)0.0223 (10)0.0320 (13)0.0003 (8)−0.0016 (10)0.0003 (10)
C10.0295 (11)0.0190 (9)0.0319 (13)0.0011 (8)−0.0047 (9)0.0035 (9)
N20.0323 (9)0.0181 (8)0.0401 (11)−0.0007 (7)−0.0033 (9)0.0011 (9)
C40.0275 (10)0.0271 (10)0.0358 (14)−0.0035 (8)−0.0004 (9)0.0032 (11)
O20.0324 (8)0.0235 (7)0.0524 (12)−0.0013 (6)0.0078 (8)0.0043 (9)
O10.0352 (8)0.0203 (7)0.0545 (12)0.0047 (6)−0.0018 (8)0.0025 (9)
N10.0279 (9)0.0203 (8)0.0371 (11)0.0024 (7)−0.0016 (9)−0.0004 (8)
C30.0261 (9)0.0222 (10)0.0357 (14)−0.0005 (8)−0.0022 (10)0.0017 (10)
C2—C31.361 (3)N2—C31.368 (3)
C2—N11.386 (3)N2—H20.8600
C2—C11.491 (3)C4—N11.334 (3)
C1—O11.246 (3)C4—H40.9300
C1—O21.267 (3)N1—H10.8600
N2—C41.324 (3)C3—H30.9300
C3—C2—N1106.10 (17)N2—C4—N1108.81 (19)
C3—C2—C1131.2 (2)N2—C4—H4125.6
N1—C2—C1122.71 (17)N1—C4—H4125.6
O1—C1—O2127.19 (19)C4—N1—C2108.57 (17)
O1—C1—C2117.49 (18)C4—N1—H1125.7
O2—C1—C2115.32 (18)C2—N1—H1125.7
C4—N2—C3108.78 (17)C2—C3—N2107.74 (19)
C4—N2—H2125.6C2—C3—H3126.1
C3—N2—H2125.6N2—C3—H3126.1
C3—C2—C1—O1−180.0 (3)C3—C2—N1—C40.5 (3)
N1—C2—C1—O1−1.9 (3)C1—C2—N1—C4−178.0 (2)
C3—C2—C1—O2−0.5 (4)N1—C2—C3—N2−0.2 (3)
N1—C2—C1—O2177.6 (2)C1—C2—C3—N2178.1 (2)
C3—N2—C4—N10.4 (3)C4—N2—C3—C2−0.1 (3)
N2—C4—N1—C2−0.6 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2···O2i0.861.822.648 (2)160.
N1—H1···O1ii0.861.912.736 (2)161.
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯O2i0.861.822.648 (2)160
N1—H1⋯O1ii0.861.912.736 (2)161

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  9 in total

1.  From metal-organic squares to porous zeolite-like supramolecular assemblies.

Authors:  Shuang Wang; Tingting Zhao; Guanghua Li; Lukasz Wojtas; Qisheng Huo; Mohamed Eddaoudi; Yunling Liu
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Two stable 3D metal-organic frameworks constructed by nanoscale cages via sharing the single-layer walls.

Authors:  Wen-Guan Lu; Cheng-Yong Su; Tong-Bu Lu; Long Jiang; Jia-Mei Chen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Zeolite-like metal-organic frameworks (ZMOFs) based on the directed assembly of finite metal-organic cubes (MOCs).

Authors:  Mohamed H Alkordi; Jacilynn A Brant; Lukasz Wojtas; Victor Ch Kravtsov; Amy J Cairns; Mohamed Eddaoudi
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Conversion of nonporous helical cadmium organic framework to a porous form.

Authors:  Zhi-Gang Gu; Yue-Peng Cai; Hua-Cai Fang; Zheng-Yuan Zhou; Praveen K Thallapally; Jian Tian; Jun Liu; Gregory J Exarhos
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Zeolite-like metal-organic frameworks (ZMOFs) as hydrogen storage platform: lithium and magnesium ion-exchange and H(2)-(rho-ZMOF) interaction studies.

Authors:  Farid Nouar; Juergen Eckert; Jarrod F Eubank; Paul Forster; Mohamed Eddaoudi
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Zeolite-like metal-organic frameworks as platforms for applications: on metalloporphyrin-based catalysts.

Authors:  Mohamed H Alkordi; Yunling Liu; Randy W Larsen; Jarrod F Eubank; Mohamed Eddaoudi
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  trans-Diaqua-bis-(1H-imidazole-4-carboxyl-ato-κN,O)nickel(II).

Authors:  Shengrun Zheng; Songliang Cai; Jun Fan; Weiguang Zhang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-06-11

9.  Diaqua-bis-(1H-imidazole-4-carboxyl-ato-κN,O)zinc.

Authors:  Wenlin Shuai; Songliang Cai; Shengrun Zheng
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-06-11
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Structural characterization of two tetra-chlorido-zincate salts of 4-carb-oxy-1H-imidazol-3-ium: a salt hydrate and a co-crystal salt hydrate.

Authors:  Sean J Martens; David K Geiger
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2017-01-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.