Literature DB >> 17956539

US regulatory system for genetically modified [genetically modified organism (GMO), rDNA or transgenic] crop cultivars.

Alan McHughen1, Stuart Smyth.   

Abstract

This paper reviews the history of the federal regulatory oversight of plant agricultural biotechnology in the USA, focusing on the scientific and political forces moulding the continually evolving regulatory structure in place today. Unlike most other jurisdictions, the USA decided to adapt pre-existing legislation to encompass products of biotechnology. In so doing, it established an overarching committee (Office of Science and Technology Policy) to study and distribute various regulatory responsibilities amongst relevant agencies: the Food and Drug Administration, Environmental Protection Agency and US Department of Agriculture. This paper reviews the history and procedures of each agency in the execution of its regulatory duties and investigates the advantages and disadvantages of the US regulatory strategy.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17956539     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00300.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J        ISSN: 1467-7644            Impact factor:   9.803


  15 in total

Review 1.  Not all GMOs are crop plants: non-plant GMO applications in agriculture.

Authors:  K E Hokanson; W O Dawson; A M Handler; M F Schetelig; R J St Leger
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-11-17       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  The public option. A possible change in US regulatory protocol for genetically modified organisms: compromised or enhanced objectivity?

Authors:  Jennifer Kuzma; Zahra Meghani
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Renegotiating GM crop regulation. Targeted gene-modification technology raises new issues for the oversight of genetically modified crops.

Authors:  Jennifer Kuzma; Adam Kokotovich
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Regulation of genome edited technologies in India.

Authors:  Murali Krishna Chimata; Gyanesh Bharti
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  Transgenic or not? No simple answer! New biotechnology-based plant breeding techniques and the regulatory landscape.

Authors:  Nancy Podevin; Yann Devos; Howard Vivian Davies; Kaare Magne Nielsen
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Comparability of imazapyr-resistant Arabidopsis created by transgenesis and mutagenesis.

Authors:  Jaimie Schnell; Hélène Labbé; Nik Kovinich; Yuzuki Manabe; Brian Miki
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  Advancing environmental risk assessment for transgenic biofeedstock crops.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wolt
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 8.  Environmental risk assessments for transgenic crops producing output trait enzymes.

Authors:  Alan Raybould; Ann Tuttle; Scott Shore; Terry Stone
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 9.  Engineering grass biomass for sustainable and enhanced bioethanol production.

Authors:  Sonali Mohapatra; Suruchee Samparana Mishra; Prerna Bhalla; Hrudayanath Thatoi
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.116

Review 10.  Is genetic engineering ever going to take off in forage, turf and bioenergy crop breeding?

Authors:  Zeng-Yu Wang; E Charles Brummer
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.