Literature DB >> 21835407

Increase in epicardial fat volume is associated with greater coronary artery calcification progression in subjects at intermediate risk by coronary calcium score: a serial study using non-contrast cardiac CT.

Rine Nakanishi1, Ronak Rajani, Victor Y Cheng, Heidi Gransar, Ryo Nakazato, Haim Shmilovich, Yuka Otaki, Sean W Hayes, Louise E J Thomson, John D Friedman, Piotr J Slomka, Daniel S Berman, Damini Dey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Epicardial fat volume (EFV) is related to calcified coronary plaques. However, it is unknown whether baseline EFV or changes in EFV affect the progression of coronary artery calcification over time.
METHODS: We identified 375 consecutive asymptomatic subjects with an intermediate risk of developing coronary artery disease, who underwent serial non-contrast CT at least 3-5 years apart. Subjects were divided into tertiles of CCS progression (% increase) between the 2 scans. Subjects from the upper tertile (High Progressors) were matched by age and gender to 81 subjects from the lower tertile (Low Progressors). All subjects underwent serial measurements of CCS and EFV. Relationships between EFV and CCS progression, and change in plaque number were examined.
RESULTS: At baseline, there was no difference in EFV, and EFV indexed to body surface area (EFVi) between the groups. At follow-up, EFV, EFVi and percent increase in EFVi-change were higher in High Progressors than Low Progressors (EFV, 102 ± 38 cm(3) vs. 90 ± 35 cm(3), p=0.03; EFVi, 50 ± 16cm(3)/m(2) vs. 46 ± 15 cm(3)/m(2), p=0.03; percent increase in EFVi-change, 15 ± 22% vs. 7 ± 20%, p=0.02). On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for conventional risk factors, EFVi increase ≥15% [odds ratio (OR) 2.3, p<0.05], log (baseline CCS) [OR 0.3, p<0.0001] and scan interval time [p=0.003, OR 1.0] were predictive of being a High Progressor. EFVi increase ≥ 15% (β=3.0, p=0.02) and hypertension (β=3.1, p=0.01) were independent predictors of number of new calcified plaques on follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Increase in EFV is associated with greater progression of coronary artery calcification in intermediate-risk subjects.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21835407     DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.07.093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atherosclerosis        ISSN: 0021-9150            Impact factor:   5.162


  39 in total

Review 1.  Progression of coronary artery calcification by cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Amir A Mahabadi; N Lehmann; I Dykun; T Müller; H Kälsch; R Erbel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  Catalysis in abiotic structured media: an approach to selective synthesis of biopolymers.

Authors:  P-A Monnard
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  Epicardial adipose tissue: far more than a fat depot.

Authors:  Andrew H Talman; Peter J Psaltis; James D Cameron; Ian T Meredith; Sujith K Seneviratne; Dennis T L Wong
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-12

4.  Pericoronary adipose tissue ratio is a stronger associated factor of plaque vulnerability than epicardial adipose tissue on coronary computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Ryo Okubo; Rine Nakanishi; Mikihito Toda; Daiga Saito; Ippei Watanabe; Takayuki Yabe; Hideo Amano; Tatsushi Hirai; Takanori Ikeda
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Epicardial adipose tissue: a benign consequence of obesity?

Authors:  Doan T Ngo; Noyan Gokce
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.792

6.  Lack of association between epicardial fat volume and extent of coronary artery calcification, severity of coronary artery disease, or presence of myocardial perfusion abnormalities in a diverse, symptomatic patient population: results from the CORE320 multicenter study.

Authors:  Yutaka Tanami; Masahiro Jinzaki; Satoru Kishi; Matthew Matheson; Andrea L Vavere; Carlos E Rochitte; Marc Dewey; Marcus Y Chen; Melvin E Clouse; Christopher Cox; Sachio Kuribayashi; Joao A C Lima; Armin Arbab-Zadeh
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 7.  Epicardial and thoracic fat - Noninvasive measurement and clinical implications.

Authors:  Damini Dey; Ryo Nakazato; Debiao Li; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-06

Review 8.  Adipose tissue biology and cardiomyopathy: translational implications.

Authors:  Aslan T Turer; Joseph A Hill; Joel K Elmquist; Philipp E Scherer
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  Measurements of pericardial adipose tissue using contrast enhanced cardiac multidetector computed tomography--comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Marie Bayer Elming; Jacob Lønborg; Thomas Rasmussen; Jørgen Tobias Kühl; Thomas Engstrøm; Niels Vejlstrup; Lars Køber; Klaus F Kofoed
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Automated quantification of epicardial adipose tissue using CT angiography: evaluation of a prototype software.

Authors:  James V Spearman; Felix G Meinel; U Joseph Schoepf; Paul Apfaltrer; Justin R Silverman; Aleksander W Krazinski; Christian Canstein; Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Philip Costello; Lucas L Geyer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.