Literature DB >> 21835283

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis-predictors of mortality and poor treatment response.

Michael Gotzmann1, Azem Pljakic, Waldemar Bojara, Michael Lindstaedt, Aydan Ewers, Alfried Germing, Andreas Mügge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an alternative technique in patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. However, a number of patients have no benefit after implantation. This prospective study attempted to identify predictors of poor treatment response.
METHODS: From June 2008 to September 2010, consecutive patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis and high surgical risk were submitted to TAVI with the CoreValve prosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). The primary end point was all-cause mortality at 6 months. Secondary end point (poor treatment response) was defined as no improvement of symptoms assessed with the New York Heart Association class 6 months after TAVI.
RESULTS: A total of 145 patients (mean age 79.1 ± 6.4 years, mean logistic EuroSCORE 21% ± 16.2%) were included. During the follow-up period, 23 (15.9%) patients died. Independent predictors of all-cause mortality were as follows: aortic mean gradient ≤40 mm Hg (odds ratio [OR] 3.93), moderate and severe tricuspid valve regurgitation (OR 4.50), and moderate and severe postprocedural aortic valve regurgitation (OR 4.26). In 122 surviving patients, 25 patients (20%) showed no improvement in symptoms. Independent predictors of poor treatment response were severe mitral valve regurgitation (OR 7.42) and moderate and severe postprocedural aortic valve regurgitation (OR 10.1).
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac comorbidities (low-gradient aortic stenosis, tricuspidal valve regurgitation) are associated with all-cause mortality, whereas mitral valve regurgitation is a risk factor for poor treatment response after TAVI. Postprocedural aortic valve regurgitation is a strong predictor of both-mortality and poor treatment response.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21835283     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  19 in total

1.  Lotus-in-Evolut R transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe paravalvular leak.

Authors:  Shabnam Rashid; Daniel J Blackman; Christopher Malkin
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2016-06-09

Review 2.  TAVI 2012: state of the art.

Authors:  Jochen Reinöhl; Constantin von Zur Mühlen; Martin Moser; Stefan Sorg; Christoph Bode; Manfred Zehender
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Paravalvular regurgitation following transcutaneous aortic valve replacement: predictors and clinical significance.

Authors:  Rebecca T Hahn; Susheel Kodali; Philippe Généreux; Martin Leon
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  New devices for TAVI: technologies and initial clinical experiences.

Authors:  Maurizio Taramasso; Alberto Pozzoli; Azeem Latib; Giovanni La Canna; Antonio Colombo; Francesco Maisano; Ottavio Alfieri
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 5.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current and future approaches.

Authors:  Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 6.  Contemporary strategy for aortic valve stenosis in octogenarians.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tsukui; Kenji Yamazaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Computed Tomography for Structural Heart Disease and Interventions.

Authors:  Pascal Thériault-Lauzier; Marco Spaziano; Beatriz Vaquerizo; Jean Buithieu; Giuseppe Martucci; Nicolo Piazza
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2015-09

Review 8.  [Aortic valve replacement in the elderly].

Authors:  F Vogt; S Wicklein; K Singler; S Pfeiffer; T Fischlein; J Schwab; M Pauschinger; J Jessl
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 1.281

9.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Christopher Cao; Su C Ang; Praveen Indraratna; Con Manganas; Paul Bannon; Deborah Black; David Tian; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01

Review 10.  Functional status and quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline A Kim; Suraj P Rasania; Jonathan Afilalo; Jeffrey J Popma; Lewis A Lipsitz; Dae Hyun Kim
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.