Literature DB >> 2183368

A comparison of four computerized methods for measuring vertebral rotation.

G G Russell1, V J Raso, D Hill, J McIvor.   

Abstract

The ability to measure vertebral rotation is particularly important in the assessment and treatment of scoliosis. We determined the accuracy and precision of four methods that may be used with routine anteroposterior (AP) spine radiographs. Two vertebrae were radiographed at 0 degrees and at 5 degrees intervals to 20 degrees and at 30 degrees, to the right and left. The radiographs were distributed to three members of the staff who marked the 14 points required for calculating rotation with the four methods. The points were digitized, and rotation calculated by computer. The results showed no significant difference in the calculated rotation of the two vertebrae, or between the results of the three markers. Stokes's method was significantly the least accurate. The other three methods were not significantly different but Bunnell's method appeared to give more consistent results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2183368     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199001000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

1.  A semi-automated method using interpolation and optimisation for the 3D reconstruction of the spine from bi-planar radiography: a precision and accuracy study.

Authors:  Raphaël Dumas; Bertrand Blanchard; Robert Carlier; Christian Garreau de Loubresse; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Catherine Marty; Maryse Moinard; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of axial vertebral rotation.

Authors:  Tomaz Vrtovec; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Application of computer graphics for assessment of spinal deformities.

Authors:  B Vandegriend; D Hill; J Raso; N Durdle; Z Zhang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Computerized tomography imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: prone versus supine.

Authors:  Gultekin Sıtkı Cecen; Deniz Gulabi; Aycicek Cecen; İsmail Oltulu; Bulent Guclu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Pedicle growth asymmetry as a cause of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Huynh; Carl-Eric Aubin; Talib Rajwani; Keith M Bagnall; Isabelle Villemure
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Reliability of thoracic spine rotation range-of-motion measurements in healthy adults.

Authors:  Katherine D Johnson; Kyung-Min Kim; Byung-Kyu Yu; Susan A Saliba; Terry L Grindstaff
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Segmental vertebral rotation in early scoliosis.

Authors:  B Xiong; J Sevastik; R Hedlund; B Sevastik
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Vertebral rotation and pedicle length asymmetry in the normal adult spine.

Authors:  B Sevastik; B Xiong; J Sevastik; R Hedlund; I Suliman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Variability of geometric measurements from three-dimensional reconstructions of scoliotic spines and rib cages.

Authors:  H Labelle; J Dansereau; C Bellefleur; J C Jéquier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Vertebral rotation measurement: a summary and comparison of common radiographic and CT methods.

Authors:  Gabrielle C Lam; Doug L Hill; Lawrence H Le; Jim V Raso; Edmond H Lou
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2008-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.