Literature DB >> 21831626

Adaptation to high current using low external resistances eliminates power overshoot in microbial fuel cells.

Yiying Hong1, Douglas F Call, Craig M Werner, Bruce E Logan.   

Abstract

One form of power overshoot commonly observed with mixed culture microbial fuel cells (MFCs) is doubling back of the power density curve at higher current densities, but the reasons for this type of overshoot have not been well explored. To investigate this, MFCs were acclimated to different external resistances, producing a range of anode potentials and current densities. Power overshoot was observed for reactors acclimated to higher (500 and 5000 Ω) but not lower (5 and 50 Ω) resistances. Acclimation of the high external resistance reactors for a few cycles to low external resistance (5 Ω), and therefore higher current densities, eliminated power overshoot. MFCs initially acclimated to low external resistances exhibited both higher current in cyclic voltammograms (CVs) and higher levels of redox activity over a broader range of anode potentials (-0.4 to 0 V; vs. a Ag/AgCl electrode) based on first derivative cyclic voltammetry (DCV) plots. Reactors acclimated to higher external resistances produced lower current in CVs, exhibited lower redox activity over a narrower anode potential range (-0.4 to -0.2 V vs. Ag/AgCl), and failed to produce higher currents above ∼-0.3 V (vs. Ag/AgCl). After the higher resistance reactors were acclimated to the lowest resistance they also exhibited similar CV and DCV profiles. Our findings show that to avoid overshoot, prior to the polarization and power density tests the anode biofilm must adapt to low external resistances to be capable of higher currents.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21831626     DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2011.06.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron        ISSN: 0956-5663            Impact factor:   10.618


  7 in total

1.  Microbial population and functional dynamics associated with surface potential and carbon metabolism.

Authors:  Shun'ichi Ishii; Shino Suzuki; Trina M Norden-Krichmar; Tony Phan; Greg Wanger; Kenneth H Nealson; Yuji Sekiguchi; Yuri A Gorby; Orianna Bretschger
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  A two-stage microbial fuel cell and anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactor (MFC-AFMBR) system for effective domestic wastewater treatment.

Authors:  Lijiao Ren; Yongtae Ahn; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Response to starvation and microbial community composition in microbial fuel cells enriched on different electron donors.

Authors:  Soroush Saheb-Alam; Frank Persson; Britt-Marie Wilén; Malte Hermansson; Oskar Modin
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 5.813

4.  Electrochemistry and microbiology of microbial fuel cells treating marine sediments polluted with heavy metals.

Authors:  Syed Zaghum Abbas; Mohd Rafatullah; Norli Ismail; Farah R Shakoori
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.361

5.  Improved energy efficiency in microbial fuel cells by bioethanol and electricity co-generation.

Authors:  Rong Xie; Shuang Wang; Kai Wang; Meng Wang; Biqiang Chen; Zheng Wang; Tianwei Tan
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod       Date:  2022-08-17

6.  A system-oriented strategy to enhance electron production of Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 in bio-photovoltaic devices: experimental and modeling insights.

Authors:  Hossein Firoozabadi; Mohammad Mahdi Mardanpour; Ehsan Motamedian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Convergent development of anodic bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Matthew D Yates; Patrick D Kiely; Douglas F Call; Hamid Rismani-Yazdi; Kyle Bibby; Jordan Peccia; John M Regan; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 10.302

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.