Literature DB >> 21830014

Traditional breast cancer risk factors in relation to molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

Rulla M Tamimi1, Graham A Colditz, Aditi Hazra, Heather J Baer, Susan E Hankinson, Bernard Rosner, Jonathan Marotti, James L Connolly, Stuart J Schnitt, Laura C Collins.   

Abstract

At least four major categories of invasive breast cancer have been reproducibly identified by gene expression profiling: luminal A, luminal B, HER2-type, and basal-like. These subtypes have been shown to differ in their outcome and response to treatment. Whether this heterogeneity reflects the evolution of these subtypes through distinct etiologic pathways has not been clearly defined. We evaluated the association between traditional breast cancer risk factors and risk of previously defined molecular subtypes of breast cancer in the Nurses' Health Study. This analysis included 2,022 invasive breast cancer cases for whom we were able to obtain archived breast cancer tissue specimens. Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed, and slides were immunostained for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Using immunostain results in combination with histologic grade, cases were grouped into molecularly defined subtypes. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We observed differences in the association between risk factors and subtypes of breast cancer. In general, many reproductive factors were most strongly associated with the luminal A subtype, although these differences were not statistically significant. Weight gain since age 18 showed significant differences in its association with molecular subtypes (P-heterogeneity = 0.05) and was most strongly associated with the luminal B subtype (P-trend 0.001). Although there was not significant heterogeneity for lactation across subtypes, an inverse association was strongest for basal-like tumors (HR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.8; P-heterogeneity = 0.88). These results support the hypothesis that different subtypes of breast cancer have different etiologies and should not be considered as a single group. Identifying risk factors for less common subtypes such as luminal B, HER2-type and basal-like tumors has important implications for prevention of these more aggressive subtypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21830014      PMCID: PMC3237947          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1702-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  24 in total

1.  High-throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well-characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses.

Authors:  Dalia M Abd El-Rehim; Graham Ball; Sarah E Pinder; Emad Rakha; Claire Paish; John F R Robertson; Douglas Macmillan; Roger W Blamey; Ian O Ellis
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Comparison of risk factors for the competing risks of coronary heart disease, stroke, and venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Robert J Glynn; Bernard Rosner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Differences in risk factors for breast cancer molecular subtypes in a population-based study.

Authors:  Xiaohong R Yang; Mark E Sherman; David L Rimm; Jolanta Lissowska; Louise A Brinton; Beata Peplonska; Stephen M Hewitt; William F Anderson; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Alicja Bardin-Mikolajczak; Witold Zatonski; Richard Cartun; Daniza Mandich; Grzegorz Rymkiewicz; Marcin Ligaj; Stanislaw Lukaszek; Radzisaw Kordek; Montserrat García-Closas
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Molecular classification and molecular forecasting of breast cancer: ready for clinical application?

Authors:  James D Brenton; Lisa A Carey; Ahmed Ashour Ahmed; Carlos Caldas
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Applying Cox regression to competing risks.

Authors:  M Lunn; D McNeil
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Bimodal frequency distribution of estrogen receptor immunohistochemical staining results in breast cancer: an analysis of 825 cases.

Authors:  Laura C Collins; Maria L Botero; Stuart J Schnitt
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 7.  The Nurses' Health Study: lifestyle and health among women.

Authors:  Graham A Colditz; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Endogenous estrogen, androgen, and progesterone concentrations and breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Stacey A Missmer; A Heather Eliassen; Robert L Barbieri; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Torsten O Nielsen; Forrest D Hsu; Kristin Jensen; Maggie Cheang; Gamze Karaca; Zhiyuan Hu; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Chad Livasy; Dave Cowan; Lynn Dressler; Lars A Akslen; Joseph Ragaz; Allen M Gown; C Blake Gilks; Matt van de Rijn; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Reproductive factors and breast cancer risk according to joint estrogen and progesterone receptor status: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Huiyan Ma; Leslie Bernstein; Malcolm C Pike; Giske Ursin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  95 in total

1.  Plasma carotenoids and risk of breast cancer over 20 y of follow-up.

Authors:  A Heather Eliassen; Xiaomei Liao; Bernard Rosner; Rulla M Tamimi; Shelley S Tworoger; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Urinary Melatonin in Relation to Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk According to Melatonin 1 Receptor Status.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Devore; Erica T Warner; A Heather Eliassen; Susan B Brown; Andrew H Beck; Susan E Hankinson; Eva S Schernhammer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  The Plausibility of Obesity Paradox in Cancer-Point.

Authors:  Yikyung Park; Lindsay L Peterson; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Breast cancer subtypes and previously established genetic risk factors: a bayesian approach.

Authors:  Katie M O'Brien; Stephen R Cole; Lawrence S Engel; Jeannette T Bensen; Charles Poole; Amy H Herring; Robert C Millikan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Breast cancer risk prediction: an update to the Rosner-Colditz breast cancer incidence model.

Authors:  Megan S Rice; Shelley S Tworoger; Susan E Hankinson; Rulla M Tamimi; A Heather Eliassen; Walter C Willett; Graham Colditz; Bernard Rosner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Dimitrios Trichopoulos and the early life origins of breast cancer.

Authors:  Lars Johan Vatten
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Alcohol Consumption and Risk of Breast Cancer by Tumor Receptor Expression.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Xuehong Zhang; Andrew H Beck; Laura C Collins; Wendy Y Chen; Rulla M Tamimi; Aditi Hazra; Myles Brown; Bernard Rosner; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.869

8.  Alcohol consumption and risk of breast cancer by molecular subtype: Prospective analysis of the nurses' health study after 26 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Kelly A Hirko; Wendy Y Chen; Walter C Willett; Bernard A Rosner; Susan E Hankinson; Andrew H Beck; Rulla M Tamimi; A Heather Eliassen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Intrinsic subtypes from PAM50 gene expression assay in a population-based breast cancer cohort: differences by age, race, and tumor characteristics.

Authors:  Carol Sweeney; Philip S Bernard; Rachel E Factor; Marilyn L Kwan; Laurel A Habel; Charles P Quesenberry; Kaylynn Shakespear; Erin K Weltzien; Inge J Stijleman; Carole A Davis; Mark T W Ebbert; Adrienne Castillo; Lawrence H Kushi; Bette J Caan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Functional Role of miRNAs in the Progression of Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.

Authors:  Bethany N Hannafon; Wei-Qun Ding
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 4.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.