Literature DB >> 21826579

Influence of genetic risk information on parental role identity in adolescent girls and young women from families with fragile X syndrome.

Allyn McConkie-Rosell1, Elizabeth Melvin Heise, Gail A Spiridigliozzi.   

Abstract

Using a multi-group cross-sectional design, we explored self-concept related to parental role salience and enactment in 53 young women (14 to 24 years) with knowledge they were either carriers, non-carriers, or could be a carrier of fragile X syndrome (FXS). Parental role salience included the participants' desire "to be a mother" and the importance they placed on this role. Enactment focused on the participants' views regarding ways to become a mother (reproductive options), parenting a child affected by FXS, and the development of partner relationships (marriage). Participants completed the FXS Adolescent Interview and the FX-Visual Analog Scale. Participants' knowledge of their genetic risk status appears to have influenced both salience and enactment of the parental role, and the effect varied based on carrier status. For many, knowledge of genetic risk appears to have led to reappraisal, redefinition, and re-engagement with the goal of becoming a parent. This process was prominent in those who were carriers and less so in those who were at-risk, and it did not typically occur in those who were non-carriers. Findings offer valuable insight into the impact of genetic risk information on developing perceptions of the parental role and offer new directions for genetic counseling with adolescents and young women with a family history of FXS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21826579      PMCID: PMC3506010          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-011-9391-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  17 in total

1.  Living with genetic risk: effect on adolescent self-concept.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Gail A Spiridigliozzi; Elizabeth Melvin; Deborah V Dawson; Ave M Lachiewicz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 2.  Schema model of the self-concept.

Authors:  K F Stein
Journal:  Image J Nurs Sch       Date:  1995

3.  Genetic counseling for fragile x syndrome: updated recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Brenda Finucane; Amy Cronister; Liane Abrams; Robin L Bennett; Barbara J Pettersen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Longitudinal study of the carrier testing process for fragile X syndrome: perceptions and coping.

Authors:  A McConkie-Rosell; G A Spiridigliozzi; J A Sullivan; D V Dawson; A M Lachiewicz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001-01-01

5.  Motherhood plans among young Australian women: who wants children these days?

Authors:  Christina Lee; Helen Gramotnev
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2006-01

6.  Carrier testing in fragile X syndrome: effect on self-concept.

Authors:  A McConkie-Rosell; G A Spiridigliozzi; J A Sullivan; D V Dawson; A M Lachiewicz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2000-06-19

7.  Genetic risk communication: experiences of adolescent girls and young women from families with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Elizabeth Melvin Heise; Gail A Spiridigliozzi
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 8.  The fragile-X premutation: a maturing perspective.

Authors:  Paul J Hagerman; Randi J Hagerman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-03-29       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Carrier testing in fragile X syndrome: when to tell and test.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Gail A Spiridigliozzi; Jennifer A Sullivan; Deborah V Dawson; Ave M Lachiewicz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2002-06-01

10.  Expansion of the fragile X CGG repeat in females with premutation or intermediate alleles.

Authors:  Sarah L Nolin; W Ted Brown; Anne Glicksman; George E Houck; Alice D Gargano; Amy Sullivan; Valérie Biancalana; Karen Bröndum-Nielsen; Helle Hjalgrim; Elke Holinski-Feder; Frank Kooy; John Longshore; James Macpherson; Jean-Louis Mandel; Gert Matthijs; Francois Rousseau; Peter Steinbach; Marja-Leena Väisänen; Harriet von Koskull; Stephanie L Sherman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-01-14       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  5 in total

1.  The changing landscape of carrier screening: expanding technology and options?.

Authors:  Michelle L McGowan; Deborah Cho; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Health Matrix Clevel       Date:  2013

Review 2.  Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; John W Belmont; Jonathan S Berg; Benjamin E Berkman; Yvonne Bombard; Ingrid A Holm; Howard P Levy; Kelly E Ormond; Howard M Saal; Nancy B Spinner; Benjamin S Wilfond; Joseph D McInerney
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Attitude of medical school students in China towards genetic testing and counseling issues in FXS.

Authors:  Jia Li; Wen Huang; Shiyu Luo; Yunting Lin; Ranhui Duan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Towards an Understanding of Neuropsychiatric Manifestations in Fragile X Premutation Carriers.

Authors:  Aaron D Besterman; Scott A Wilke; Tua-Elisabeth Mulligan; Stephen C Allison; Randi Hagerman; Andreea L Seritan; James A Bourgeois
Journal:  Future Neurol       Date:  2014-03

5.  Experiences of Women Who Have Had Carrier Testing for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Becker Muscular Dystrophy During Adolescence.

Authors:  Harry G Fraser; Rebecca Z Redmond; Diana F Scotcher
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.537

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.