Literature DB >> 12529854

Expansion of the fragile X CGG repeat in females with premutation or intermediate alleles.

Sarah L Nolin1, W Ted Brown, Anne Glicksman, George E Houck, Alice D Gargano, Amy Sullivan, Valérie Biancalana, Karen Bröndum-Nielsen, Helle Hjalgrim, Elke Holinski-Feder, Frank Kooy, John Longshore, James Macpherson, Jean-Louis Mandel, Gert Matthijs, Francois Rousseau, Peter Steinbach, Marja-Leena Väisänen, Harriet von Koskull, Stephanie L Sherman.   

Abstract

The CGG repeat in the 5' untranslated region of the fragile X mental retardation 1 gene (FMR1) exhibits remarkable instability upon transmission from mothers with premutation alleles. A collaboration of 13 laboratories in eight countries was established to examine four issues concerning FMR1 CGG-repeat instability among females with premutation (approximately 55-200 repeats) and intermediate (approximately 46-60 repeats) alleles. Our central findings were as follows: (1) The smallest premutation alleles that expanded to a full mutation (>200 repeats) in one generation contained 59 repeats; sequence analysis of the 59-repeat alleles from these two females revealed no AGG interruptions within the FMR1 CGG repeat. (2) When we corrected for ascertainment and recalculated the risks of expansion to a full mutation, we found that the risks for premutation alleles with <100 repeats were lower than those previously published. (3) When we examined the possible influence of sex of offspring on transmission of a full mutation-by analysis of 567 prenatal fragile X studies of 448 mothers with premutation and full-mutation alleles-we found no significant differences in the proportion of full-mutation alleles in male or female fetuses. (4) When we examined 136 transmissions of intermediate alleles from 92 mothers with no family history of fragile X, we found that, in contrast to the instability observed in families with fragile X, most (99/136 [72.8%]) transmissions of intermediate alleles were stable. The unstable transmissions (37/136 [27.2%]) in these families included both expansions and contractions in repeat size. The instability increased with the larger intermediate alleles (19% for 49-54 repeats, 30.9% for 55-59, and 80% for 60-65 repeats). These studies should allow improved risk assessments for genetic counseling of women with premutation or intermediate-size alleles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12529854      PMCID: PMC379237          DOI: 10.1086/367713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  38 in total

1.  Instability of a 550-base pair DNA segment and abnormal methylation in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  I Oberlé; F Rousseau; D Heitz; C Kretz; D Devys; A Hanauer; J Boué; M F Bertheas; J L Mandel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-05-24       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Fragile-X syndrome: unique genetics of the heritable unstable element.

Authors:  S Yu; J Mulley; D Loesch; G Turner; A Donnelly; A Gedeon; D Hillen; E Kremer; M Lynch; M Pritchard
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Prevalence of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  G Turner; T Webb; S Wake; H Robinson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1996-07-12

4.  Isolation of sequences that span the fragile X and identification of a fragile X-related CpG island.

Authors:  D Heitz; F Rousseau; D Devys; S Saccone; H Abderrahim; D Le Paslier; D Cohen; A Vincent; D Toniolo; G Della Valle
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-03-08       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Identification of a gene (FMR-1) containing a CGG repeat coincident with a breakpoint cluster region exhibiting length variation in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  A J Verkerk; M Pieretti; J S Sutcliffe; Y H Fu; D P Kuhl; A Pizzuti; O Reiner; S Richards; M F Victoria; F P Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-05-31       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Variation of the CGG repeat at the fragile X site results in genetic instability: resolution of the Sherman paradox.

Authors:  Y H Fu; D P Kuhl; A Pizzuti; M Pieretti; J S Sutcliffe; S Richards; A J Verkerk; J J Holden; R G Fenwick; S T Warren
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-12-20       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  The fragile X premutation: into the phenotypic fold.

Authors:  Randi J Hagerman; Paul J Hagerman
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.578

8.  Absence of expression of the FMR-1 gene in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  M Pieretti; F P Zhang; Y H Fu; S T Warren; B A Oostra; C T Caskey; D L Nelson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-08-23       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Prevalence of the fragile X syndrome in African-Americans.

Authors:  Dana C Crawford; Kellen L Meadows; James L Newman; Lisa F Taft; Elizabeth Scott; Mary Leslie; Lisa Shubek; Patricia Holmgreen; Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp; Coleen Boyle; Stephanie L Sherman
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2002-07-01

Review 10.  FMR1 and the fragile X syndrome: human genome epidemiology review.

Authors:  D C Crawford; J M Acuña; S L Sherman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  125 in total

1.  Carrier screening in preconception consultation in primary care.

Authors:  Sylvia A Metcalfe
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-12-20

2.  Ovarian histopathological and ubiquitin-immunophenotypic features in fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency: a study of five cases and selected controls.

Authors:  Martin C Chang; John J DeCaro; Mei Zheng; Marla Gearing; Lisa Shubeck; Stephanie L Sherman; Corrine K Welt
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  Communication of genetic risk information to daughters in families with fragile X syndrome: the parent's perspective.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Jacqueline Del Giorno; Elizabeth Melvin Heise
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Size bias of fragile X premutation alleles in late-onset movement disorders.

Authors:  Sebastien Jacquemont; Maureen A Leehey; Randi J Hagerman; Laurel A Beckett; Paul J Hagerman
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 5.  A review of fragile X premutation disorders: expanding the psychiatric perspective.

Authors:  James A Bourgeois; Sarah M Coffey; Susan M Rivera; David Hessl; Louise W Gane; Flora Tassone; Claudia Greco; Brenda Finucane; Lawrence Nelson; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Jim Grigsby; Paul J Hagerman; Randi J Hagerman
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 4.384

6.  Longitudinal interviews of couples diagnosed with diminished ovarian reserve undergoing fragile X premutation testing.

Authors:  Lisa M Pastore; Logan B Karns; Karen Ventura; Myra L Clark; Richard H Steeves; Nancy Callanan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  FMR1: a gene with three faces.

Authors:  Ben A Oostra; Rob Willemsen
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-02-21

Review 8.  Fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Wilmar Saldarriaga; Flora Tassone; Laura Yuriko González-Teshima; Jose Vicente Forero-Forero; Sebastián Ayala-Zapata; Randi Hagerman
Journal:  Colomb Med (Cali)       Date:  2014-12-30

Review 9.  Genetic Testing in Endocrinology.

Authors:  Sunita Mc De Sousa; Tristan Se Hardy; Hamish S Scott; David J Torpy
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2018-02

10.  FMR1 repeat sizes in the gray zone and high end of the normal range are associated with premature ovarian failure.

Authors:  Karla L Bretherick; Margo R Fluker; Wendy P Robinson
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.