BACKGROUND: The treatment of traumatic injuries to the colon and rectum is often driven by dogma, despite the presence of evidence suggesting alternative methods of care. OBJECTIVE: This is an evidence-based review, in the format of a review article, to determine the ideal treatment of noniatrogenic traumatic injuries to the colon and rectum to improve the care provided to this group of patients. Recommendations and treatment algorithms were based on consensus conclusions of the data. DATA SOURCES: A search of MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database of Collected Reviews was performed from 1965 through December 2010. STUDY SELECTION: Authors independently reviewed selected abstracts to determine their scientific merit and relevance based on key-word combinations regarding colorectal trauma. A directed search of the embedded references from the primary articles was also performed in select circumstances. We then performed a complete evaluation of 108 articles and 3 additional abstracts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcomes were morbidity, mortality, and colostomy rates. RESULTS: Evidence-based recommendations and algorithms are presented for the management of traumatic colorectal injuries. LIMITATIONS: Level I and II evidence was limited. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal injuries remain a challenging clinical entity associated with significant morbidity. Familiarity with the different methods to approach and manage these injuries, including "damage control" tactics when necessary, will allow surgeons to minimize unnecessary complications and mortality.
BACKGROUND: The treatment of traumatic injuries to the colon and rectum is often driven by dogma, despite the presence of evidence suggesting alternative methods of care. OBJECTIVE: This is an evidence-based review, in the format of a review article, to determine the ideal treatment of noniatrogenic traumatic injuries to the colon and rectum to improve the care provided to this group of patients. Recommendations and treatment algorithms were based on consensus conclusions of the data. DATA SOURCES: A search of MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database of Collected Reviews was performed from 1965 through December 2010. STUDY SELECTION: Authors independently reviewed selected abstracts to determine their scientific merit and relevance based on key-word combinations regarding colorectal trauma. A directed search of the embedded references from the primary articles was also performed in select circumstances. We then performed a complete evaluation of 108 articles and 3 additional abstracts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcomes were morbidity, mortality, and colostomy rates. RESULTS: Evidence-based recommendations and algorithms are presented for the management of traumatic colorectal injuries. LIMITATIONS: Level I and II evidence was limited. CONCLUSIONS:Colorectal injuries remain a challenging clinical entity associated with significant morbidity. Familiarity with the different methods to approach and manage these injuries, including "damage control" tactics when necessary, will allow surgeons to minimize unnecessary complications and mortality.
Authors: Mariya E Skube; Quinn Mallery; Elizabeth Lusczek; Joel Elterman; Mary A Spott; Greg J Beilman Journal: Mil Med Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Luis Guillermo Saldarriaga; Helmer Emilio Palacios-Rodríguez; Luis Fernando Pino; Adolfo González Hadad; Yaset Caicedo; Jessica Capre; Alberto García; Fernando Rodríguez-Holguín; Alexander Salcedo; José Julián Serna; Mario Alain Herrera; Michael W Parra; Carlos A Ordoñez; Abraham Kestenberg-Himelfarb Journal: Colomb Med (Cali) Date: 2021-05-20