Literature DB >> 30264196

Rectal trauma injuries: outcomes from the U.S. National Trauma Data Bank.

K J Gash1,2, K Suradkar1,2, R P Kiran3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a  lack of general consensus and a little published data regarding the management of trauma-related rectal injuries and outcomes. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the surgical management and corresponding outcomes for this patient cohort, using a nationwide trauma database.
METHODS: Rectal injuries and procedures performed over a 2-year period (2013 and 2014) were identified through ICD-9 clinical modification codes, from the United States National Trauma Data Bank. Patient factors, management variables, and outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS: Of 1.7 million patients, 1472 (0.1%) sustained a rectal injury; 81% male, median age 30 years (range 16-89 years) and 60% due to penetrating trauma. Seven hundred and seventy-eight (52.8%) had an isolated extraperitoneal injury and 694 (47.2%) had isolated Intraperitoneal or combined intra- and extraperitoneal injuries. Overall, 726 patients (49.3%) underwent fecal diversion. Injuries following blunt trauma were associated with higher injury severity scores (ISS), lower stoma rates, longer hospital and intensive-care unit (ICU) stay, and higher mortality rates than penetrating trauma (all p ≤ 0.001). Patients with stoma formation had lower mortality than undiverted patients (8.6 vs. 4.0%, p < 0.001) despite a higher ISS and more intraperitoneal injuries, but longer hospital and ICU stay (all p ≤ 0.001). On multivariate regression analysis, older age, higher ISS, intraperitoneal injury, and return to the ICU were independently associated with higher rates of mortality, while stoma formation was associated with a lower mortality rate. For isolated extraperitoneal rectal injuries, 494 patients (63.5%) were managed by resection/repair without stoma and had significantly lower overall postoperative morbidity rates (12.7 vs. 30.2%, p = 0.009) and shorter hospital stay (14 vs. 23 days, p < 0.001), than those who underwent resection/repair + stoma (n = 284; 36.5%), despite no significant difference in ISS (29 vs. 27, p = 0.780). There was no significant difference in mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that trauma-related rectal injuries are rare and there is wide variation in their management. These data support a low threshold for stoma formation in patients with intraperitoneal or combined injuries, while suggesting that isolated extraperitoneal defects may be safely managed without fecal diversion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal; Injury; Outcomes; Rectal; Surgery; Trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30264196     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1856-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  20 in total

1.  The early treatment, and results thereof, of injuries of the colon and rectum, with 70 additional cases.

Authors:  E R TAYLOR; J E THOMPSON
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1948-09-04

2.  Rectal trauma: management based on anatomic distinctions.

Authors:  V McGrath; T C Fabian; M A Croce; G Minard; F E Pritchard
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care.

Authors:  S P Baker; B O'Neill; W Haddon; W B Long
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1974-03

Review 4.  Management of penetrating extraperitoneal rectal injuries: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline.

Authors:  Patrick L Bosarge; John J Como; Nicole Fox; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Elliott R Haut; Heath A Dorion; Nimitt J Patel; Amy Rushing; Lauren A Raff; Amy A McDonald; Bryce R H Robinson; Gerald McGwin; Richard P Gonzalez
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.313

5.  Outcomes after colon trauma in the 21st century: an analysis of the U.S. National Trauma Data Bank.

Authors:  Quinton Hatch; Marlin Causey; Matthew Martin; Douglas Stoddard; Eric Johnson; Justin Maykel; Scott Steele
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 6.  Traumatic injury of the colon and rectum: the evidence vs dogma.

Authors:  Scott R Steele; Justin A Maykel; Eric K Johnson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 7.  Colon and rectal injuries.

Authors:  Robert K Cleary; Richard A Pomerantz; Richard M Lampman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Colorectal injury: where do we stand with repair?

Authors:  B J Miller; D J Schache
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1996-06

9.  Colostomy and drainage for civilian rectal injuries: is that all?

Authors:  J M Burch; D V Feliciano; K L Mattox
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The role of presacral drainage in the management of penetrating rectal injuries.

Authors:  R P Gonzalez; M E Falimirski; M R Holevar
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1998-10
View more
  4 in total

1.  Management of some extra-peritoneal rectal injuries without fecal diversion may be feasible, but high-quality evidence is still needed.

Authors:  R W Schroll
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Comment on: Rectal trauma injuries: outcomes from the U.S. National Trauma Data Bank By K.J. Gash et al.

Authors:  R Pietroletti
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  A systematic review of penetrating perineal trauma in a civilian setting.

Authors:  Elliot Yeung Chong; Daniel Wen Xiang Goh; Angela Hui-Shan Lim; Serene Si Ning Goh; Sunder Balasubramaniam
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  A rectal foreign body: An unexpected cause of a rectovesical fistula with hematuria.

Authors:  Abdelmoughit Hosni; Amine Saouli; Abdellatif Koutani; Ahmed Iben Attya Andalousi; Laila Jroundi; Fatima Zahrae Laamrani
Journal:  Urol Case Rep       Date:  2021-02-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.