Literature DB >> 21825890

Effectiveness of biofeedback therapy in the treatment of anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery.

Kyung Ho Kim1, Chang Sik Yu, Yong Sik Yoon, Sang Nam Yoon, Seok-Byung Lim, Jin Cheon Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although anterior resection syndrome commonly occurs after anal sphincter-saving surgery, no standard treatment option is currently available.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of biofeedback in patients with anterior resection syndrome after sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer.
DESIGN: This study was a retrospective review of data collected during the course of treatment. SETTINGS: Patients were treated at a teaching hospital (Asan Medical Center) in Seoul, Korea, from January 2003 through December 2008. PATIENTS: Patients who received biofeedback therapy for anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Cleveland Clinic Florida fecal incontinence score, number of bowel movements per day, a visual analog scale for assessing patient satisfaction, and anorectal manometry were used to assess outcome of biofeedback treatment.
RESULTS: : After biofeedback therapy, significant improvements were observed in fecal incontinence score (P < .001), number of bowel movements (P < .001), and anorectal manometry data (maximum resting pressure, P = .010; maximum squeeze pressure, P = .006; rectal capacity, P = .003). Compared with patients who started biofeedback treatment less than 18 months after surgery, those who started biofeedback at 18 months or longer after surgery showed greater improvements in fecal incontinence score (P = .032). Only patients with fecal incontinence as the primary symptom showed significant improvements in all variables, including fecal incontinence score, P < .001; defecation frequency, P < .001; and anorectal manometry (maximum resting pressure, P = .027; maximum squeeze pressure, P = .021; rectal capacity, P = .004). Patients who received radiation therapy in addition to surgery reported a significantly higher satisfaction score than those receiving surgery alone (P = .041). LIMITATIONS: This is a nonrandomized retrospective study. Anorectal manometry was not regularly performed in all patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Biofeedback therapy produced significant clinical benefits for patients with severe fecal incontinence and may be an effective treatment for patients with anterior resection syndrome after surgery for rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21825890     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318221a934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  26 in total

Review 1.  Treatment possibilities for low anterior resection syndrome: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Audrius Dulskas; Edgaras Smolskas; Inga Kildusiene; Narimantas E Samalavicius
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Sacral neurostimulation for low anterior resection syndrome after radical resection for rectal cancer: evaluation of treatment with the LARS score.

Authors:  M D'Hondt; F Nuytens; L Kinget; M Decaestecker; B Borgers; I Parmentier
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Characteristics and risk factors associated with permanent stomas after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Seok In Seo; Chang Sik Yu; Gwon Sik Kim; Jong Lyul Lee; Yong Sik Yoon; Chan Wook Kim; Seok-Byung Lim; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Current Management and Future Directions.

Authors:  Timothy J Ridolfi; Nicholas Berger; Kirk A Ludwig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

5.  Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Low Rectal Cancers: Incidence and Risk Factors for Permanent Stoma.

Authors:  Joanna Chung Kiu Mak; Dominic Chi Chung Foo; Rockson Wei; Wai Lun Law
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation for Bowel Dysfunction After Intersphincteric Resection for Lower Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Hideaki Nishigori; Masayuki Ishii; Yujiro Kokado; Kouji Fujimoto; Hiroshi Higashiyama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Anorectal manometric parameters are influenced by gender and age in subjects with normal bowel function.

Authors:  Hyang Ran Lee; Seok-Byung Lim; Jeong Yun Park
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  Pelvic floor rehabilitation to improve functional outcome after a low anterior resection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wilhelmina S Visser; Wouter W Te Riele; Djamila Boerma; Bert van Ramshorst; Henderik L van Westreenen
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2014-06-23

9.  Biofeedback Therapy Before Ileostomy Closure in Patients Undergoing Sphincter-Saving Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jeong-Ki Kim; Byeong Geon Jeon; Yoon Suk Song; Mi Sun Seo; Yoon-Hye Kwon; Ji Won Park; Seung-Bum Ryoo; Seung-Yong Jeong; Kyu Joo Park
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2015-08-31

10.  Sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and "low anterior resection syndrome" following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  O Schwandner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.