Literature DB >> 21825117

Carbon debt of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) grasslands converted to bioenergy production.

Ilya Gelfand1, Terenzio Zenone, Poonam Jasrotia, Jiquan Chen, Stephen K Hamilton, G Philip Robertson.   

Abstract

Over 13 million ha of former cropland are enrolled in the US Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), providing well-recognized biodiversity, water quality, and carbon (C) sequestration benefits that could be lost on conversion back to agricultural production. Here we provide measurements of the greenhouse gas consequences of converting CRP land to continuous corn, corn-soybean, or perennial grass for biofuel production. No-till soybeans preceded the annual crops and created an initial carbon debt of 10.6 Mg CO(2) equivalents (CO(2)e)·ha(-1) that included agronomic inputs, changes in C stocks, altered N(2)O and CH(4) fluxes, and foregone C sequestration less a fossil fuel offset credit. Total debt, which includes future debt created by additional changes in soil C stocks and the loss of substantial future soil C sequestration, can be constrained to 68 Mg CO(2)e·ha(-1) if subsequent crops are under permanent no-till management. If tilled, however, total debt triples to 222 Mg CO(2)e·ha(-1) on account of further soil C loss. Projected C debt repayment periods under no-till management range from 29 to 40 y for corn-soybean and continuous corn, respectively. Under conventional tillage repayment periods are three times longer, from 89 to 123 y, respectively. Alternatively, the direct use of existing CRP grasslands for cellulosic feedstock production would avoid C debt entirely and provide modest climate change mitigation immediately. Incentives for permanent no till and especially permission to harvest CRP biomass for cellulosic biofuel would help to blunt the climate impact of future CRP conversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21825117      PMCID: PMC3158227          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1017277108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  15 in total

1.  Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Conversion from agriculture to grassland builds soil organic matter on decadal timescales.

Authors:  Kendra K McLauchlan; Sarah E Hobbie; Wilfred M Post
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.657

3.  Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals.

Authors:  Alexander E Farrell; Richard J Plevin; Brian T Turner; Andrew D Jones; Michael O'Hare; Daniel M Kammen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Biomass energy: the scale of the potential resource.

Authors:  Christopher B Field; J Elliott Campbell; David B Lobell
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Climate change and health costs of air emissions from biofuels and gasoline.

Authors:  Jason Hill; Stephen Polasky; Erik Nelson; David Tilman; Hong Huo; Lindsay Ludwig; James Neumann; Haochi Zheng; Diego Bonta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Biofuels, land use change, and greenhouse gas emissions: some unexplored variables.

Authors:  Hyungtae Kim; Seungdo Kim; Bruce E Dale
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Set-asides can be better climate investment than corn ethanol.

Authors:  Gervasio Piñeiro; Esteban G Jobbágy; Justin Baker; Brian C Murray; Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.657

8.  Energy. Beneficial biofuels--the food, energy, and environment trilemma.

Authors:  David Tilman; Robert Socolow; Jonathan A Foley; Jason Hill; Eric Larson; Lee Lynd; Stephen Pacala; John Reilly; Tim Searchinger; Chris Somerville; Robert Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass.

Authors:  David Tilman; Jason Hill; Clarence Lehman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt.

Authors:  Joseph Fargione; Jason Hill; David Tilman; Stephen Polasky; Peter Hawthorne
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  19 in total

1.  Recent land use change in the Western Corn Belt threatens grasslands and wetlands.

Authors:  Christopher K Wright; Michael C Wimberly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Bioenergy and Biodiversity: Key Lessons from the Pan American Region.

Authors:  Keith L Kline; Fernanda Silva Martinelli; Audrey L Mayer; Rodrigo Medeiros; Camila Ortolan F Oliveira; Gerd Sparovek; Arnaldo Walter; Lisa A Venier
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 3.  Biogeochemical Research Priorities for Sustainable Biofuel and Bioenergy Feedstock Production in the Americas.

Authors:  Hero T Gollany; Brian D Titus; D Andrew Scott; Heidi Asbjornsen; Sigrid C Resh; Rodney A Chimner; Donald J Kaczmarek; Luiz F C Leite; Ana C C Ferreira; Kenton A Rod; Jorge Hilbert; Marcelo V Galdos; Michelle E Cisz
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Bioenergy: Biofuel production on the margins.

Authors:  Klaus Butterbach-Bahl; Ralf Kiese
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest.

Authors:  Ilya Gelfand; Ritvik Sahajpal; Xuesong Zhang; R César Izaurralde; Katherine L Gross; G Philip Robertson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Land-use change reduces habitat suitability for supporting managed honey bee colonies in the Northern Great Plains.

Authors:  Clint R V Otto; Cali L Roth; Benjamin L Carlson; Matthew D Smart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Can the Results of Biodiversity-Ecosystem Productivity Studies Be Translated to Bioenergy Production?

Authors:  Timothy L Dickson; Katherine L Gross
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Energy potential of biomass from conservation grasslands in Minnesota, USA.

Authors:  Jacob M Jungers; Joseph E Fargione; Craig C Sheaffer; Donald L Wyse; Clarence Lehman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Factors contributing to the recalcitrance of herbaceous dicotyledons (forbs) to enzymatic deconstruction.

Authors:  Dina Jabbour; Evan R Angelos; Achira Mukhopadhyay; Alec Womboldt; Melissa S Borrusch; Jonathan D Walton
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  Initial nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide, and methane costs of converting conservation reserve program grassland to row crops under no-till vs. conventional tillage.

Authors:  Leilei Ruan; G Philip Robertson
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 10.863

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.