Literature DB >> 27573824

Land-use change reduces habitat suitability for supporting managed honey bee colonies in the Northern Great Plains.

Clint R V Otto1, Cali L Roth2, Benjamin L Carlson2, Matthew D Smart2.   

Abstract

Human reliance on insect pollination services continues to increase even as pollinator populations exhibit global declines. Increased commodity crop prices and federal subsidies for biofuel crops, such as corn and soybeans, have contributed to rapid land-use change in the US Northern Great Plains (NGP), changes that may jeopardize habitat for honey bees in a part of the country that supports >40% of the US colony stock. We investigated changes in biofuel crop production and grassland land covers surrounding ∼18,000 registered commercial apiaries in North and South Dakota from 2006 to 2014. We then developed habitat selection models to identify remotely sensed land-cover and land-use features that influence apiary site selection by Dakota beekeepers. Our study demonstrates a continual increase in biofuel crops, totaling 1.2 Mha, around registered apiary locations in North and South Dakota. Such crops were avoided by commercial beekeepers when selecting apiary sites in this region. Furthermore, our analysis reveals how grasslands that beekeepers target when selecting commercial apiary locations are becoming less common in eastern North and South Dakota, changes that may have lasting impact on pollinator conservation efforts. Our study highlights how land-use change in the NGP is altering the landscape in ways that are seemingly less conducive to beekeeping. Our models can be used to guide future conservation efforts highlighted in the US national pollinator health strategy by identifying areas that support high densities of commercial apiaries and that have exhibited significant land-use changes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apis mellifera; apiary selection models; land use; land-cover trends; pollinators

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27573824      PMCID: PMC5027442          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1603481113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

1.  Predicting risk of habitat conversion in native temperate grasslands.

Authors:  Scott E Stephens; Johann A Walker; Darin R Blunck; Aneetha Jayaraman; David E Naugle; James K Ringelman; Aaron J Smith
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 6.560

2.  How much does agriculture depend on pollinators? Lessons from long-term trends in crop production.

Authors:  Marcelo A Aizen; Lucas A Garibaldi; Saul A Cunningham; Alexandra M Klein
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Seed coating with a neonicotinoid insecticide negatively affects wild bees.

Authors:  Maj Rundlöf; Georg K S Andersson; Riccardo Bommarco; Ingemar Fries; Veronica Hederström; Lina Herbertsson; Ove Jonsson; Björn K Klatt; Thorsten R Pedersen; Johanna Yourstone; Henrik G Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Recent land use change in the Western Corn Belt threatens grasslands and wetlands.

Authors:  Christopher K Wright; Michael C Wimberly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Honey bee diet in intensive farmland habitats reveals an unexpectedly high flower richness and a major role of weeds.

Authors:  Fabrice Requier; Jean-François Odoux; Thierry Tamic; Nathalie Moreau; Mickaël Henry; Axel Decourtye; Vincent Bretagnolle
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Neonicotinoid pesticide reduces bumble bee colony growth and queen production.

Authors:  Penelope R Whitehorn; Stephanie O'Connor; Felix L Wackers; Dave Goulson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Multiple routes of pesticide exposure for honey bees living near agricultural fields.

Authors:  Christian H Krupke; Greg J Hunt; Brian D Eitzer; Gladys Andino; Krispn Given
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Insect pollinated crops, insect pollinators and US agriculture: trend analysis of aggregate data for the period 1992-2009.

Authors:  Nicholas W Calderone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Neonicotinoid pesticide exposure impairs crop pollination services provided by bumblebees.

Authors:  Dara A Stanley; Michael P D Garratt; Jennifer B Wickens; Victoria J Wickens; Simon G Potts; Nigel E Raine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Mapping large-area landscape suitability for honey bees to assess the influence of land-use change on sustainability of national pollination services.

Authors:  Alisa L Gallant; Ned H Euliss; Zac Browning
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  21 in total

1.  Diverging landscape impacts on macronutrient status despite overlapping diets in managed (Apis mellifera) and native (Melissodes desponsa) bees.

Authors:  Christina L Mogren; María-Soledad Benítez; Kevin McCarter; Frédéric Boyer; Jonathan G Lundgren
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.079

2.  Land conversion and pesticide use degrade forage areas for honey bees in America's beekeeping epicenter.

Authors:  Dan J Dixon; Haochi Zheng; Clint R V Otto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Ecological and evolutionary approaches to managing honeybee disease.

Authors:  Berry J Brosi; Keith S Delaplane; Michael Boots; Jacobus C de Roode
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Rapid Crop Cover Mapping for the Conterminous United States.

Authors:  Devendra Dahal; Bruce Wylie; Danny Howard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Honey bee colony performance and health are enhanced by apiary proximity to US Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) lands.

Authors:  Vincent A Ricigliano; Brendon M Mott; Patrick W Maes; Amy S Floyd; William Fitz; Duan C Copeland; William G Meikle; Kirk E Anderson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Wild pollinator activity negatively related to honey bee colony densities in urban context.

Authors:  Lise Ropars; Isabelle Dajoz; Colin Fontaine; Audrey Muratet; Benoît Geslin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Developmental environment shapes honeybee worker response to virus infection.

Authors:  Alexander Walton; Amy L Toth; Adam G Dolezal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Consistent pollen nutritional intake drives bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) colony growth and reproduction across different habitats.

Authors:  Anthony D Vaudo; Liam M Farrell; Harland M Patch; Christina M Grozinger; John F Tooker
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Past role and future outlook of the Conservation Reserve Program for supporting honey bees in the Great Plains.

Authors:  Clint R V Otto; Haochi Zheng; Alisa L Gallant; Rich Iovanna; Benjamin L Carlson; Matthew D Smart; Skip Hyberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Honey bees overwintering in a southern climate: longitudinal effects of nutrition and queen age on colony-level molecular physiology and performance.

Authors:  Vincent A Ricigliano; Brendon M Mott; Amy S Floyd; Duan C Copeland; Mark J Carroll; Kirk E Anderson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.