BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Sporophytic self-incompatibility (SI) prevents inbreeding in many members of the Brassicaceae, and has been well documented in a variety of high-profile species. Arabis alpina is currently being developed as a model system for studying the ecological genetics of arctic-alpine environments, and is the focus of numerous studies on population structure and alpine phylogeography. Although it is highly inbreeding throughout most of its range, populations in central Italy have been identified that show inbreeding coefficients (F(IS)) more typical of self-incompatible relatives. The purpose of this study was to establish whether this variation is due to a functioning SI system. METHODS: Outcrossing rate estimates were calculated based on 16 allozyme loci and self-compatibility assessed based on controlled pollinations for six Italian populations that have previously been shown to vary in F(IS) values. Putative SRK alleles (the gene controlling the female component of SI in other Brassicaceae) amplified from A. alpina were compared with those published for other species. Linkage of putative SRK alleles and SI phenotypes was assessed using a diallel cross. KEY RESULTS: Functional avoidance of inbreeding is demonstrated in three populations of A. alpina, corresponding with previous F(IS) values. The presence is described of 15 putative SRK-like alleles, which show high sequence identity to known alleles from Brassica and Arabidopsis and the high levels of synonymous and nonsynonymous variation typical of genes under balancing selection. Also, orthologues of two other members of the S-receptor kinase gene family, Aly8 (ARK3) and Aly9 (AtS1) are identified. Further to this, co-segregation between some of the putative S-alleles and compatibility phenotypes was demonstrated using a full-sibling cross design. CONCLUSIONS: The results strongly suggest that, as with other species in the Brassicaceae, A. alpina has a sporophytic SI system but shows variation in the strength of SI within and between populations.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Sporophytic self-incompatibility (SI) prevents inbreeding in many members of the Brassicaceae, and has been well documented in a variety of high-profile species. Arabis alpina is currently being developed as a model system for studying the ecological genetics of arctic-alpine environments, and is the focus of numerous studies on population structure and alpine phylogeography. Although it is highly inbreeding throughout most of its range, populations in central Italy have been identified that show inbreeding coefficients (F(IS)) more typical of self-incompatible relatives. The purpose of this study was to establish whether this variation is due to a functioning SI system. METHODS: Outcrossing rate estimates were calculated based on 16 allozyme loci and self-compatibility assessed based on controlled pollinations for six Italian populations that have previously been shown to vary in F(IS) values. Putative SRK alleles (the gene controlling the female component of SI in other Brassicaceae) amplified from A. alpina were compared with those published for other species. Linkage of putative SRK alleles and SI phenotypes was assessed using a diallel cross. KEY RESULTS: Functional avoidance of inbreeding is demonstrated in three populations of A. alpina, corresponding with previous F(IS) values. The presence is described of 15 putative SRK-like alleles, which show high sequence identity to known alleles from Brassica and Arabidopsis and the high levels of synonymous and nonsynonymous variation typical of genes under balancing selection. Also, orthologues of two other members of the S-receptor kinase gene family, Aly8 (ARK3) and Aly9 (AtS1) are identified. Further to this, co-segregation between some of the putative S-alleles and compatibility phenotypes was demonstrated using a full-sibling cross design. CONCLUSIONS: The results strongly suggest that, as with other species in the Brassicaceae, A. alpina has a sporophytic SI system but shows variation in the strength of SI within and between populations.
Authors: Andrew G Stephenson; Steven E Travers; Jorge I Mena-Ali; James A Winsor Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2003-06-29 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: John Paul Foxe; Marc Stift; Andrew Tedder; Annabelle Haudry; Stephen I Wright; Barbara K Mable Journal: Evolution Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.694
Authors: K G Dwyer; M K Kandasamy; D I Mahosky; J Acciai; B I Kudish; J E Miller; M E Nasrallah; J B Nasrallah Journal: Plant Cell Date: 1994-12 Impact factor: 11.277
Authors: Benjamin Laenen; Andrew Tedder; Michael D Nowak; Per Toräng; Jörg Wunder; Stefan Wötzel; Kim A Steige; Yiannis Kourmpetis; Thomas Odong; Andreas D Drouzas; Marco C A M Bink; Jon Ågren; George Coupland; Tanja Slotte Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Stephen W Ansell; Hans K Stenøien; Michael Grundmann; Stephen J Russell; Marcus A Koch; Harald Schneider; Johannes C Vogel Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2011-06-28 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Stefan Wötzel; Marco Andrello; Maria C Albani; Marcus A Koch; George Coupland; Felix Gugerli Journal: Mol Ecol Resour Date: 2021-09-07 Impact factor: 8.678
Authors: Andrew Tedder; Samuel Carleial; Martyna Gołębiewska; Christian Kappel; Kentaro K Shimizu; Marc Stift Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 3.240