BACKGROUND: Prenotification to hospitals by emergency medical services of patients with suspected stroke is recommended to reduce delays in time-dependent therapies. We hypothesized that hospital prenotification would reduce recommended stroke time targets. METHODS: We used the Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital (RWJUH) Brain Attack Database, which includes demographic and clinical data on all emergency department (ED) patients alerted as a Brain Attack between January 1, 2009 and June 30, 2010. Outcome variables included the time from door to stroke team arrival, computed tomographic (CT) scan completion, CT scan interpretation, electrocardiogram, laboratory results, treatment decision, and intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration. The primary independent variable was brain attack activation before arrival to the emergency department (ED; prenotification) versus on or after ED arrival (no prenotification). Analysis of covariance was used with patient predictors as covariates in addition to the one of interest (prenotification vs no prenotification). P ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were 229 patients (114 prenotification and 115 no prenotification) alerted as having a brain attack within the study period. Patients with prehospital notification were older (69.5 years vs 61.5 years; P = .0002), had more severe strokes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 11.1 vs 6.9; P < .0001), and received IV tPA twice as often (27% vs 15%; P = .024). Prenotification resulted in a significant reduction in all stroke time targets except door to treatment decision and tPA administration. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital notification of suspected stroke patients reduces time to stroke team arrival, CT scan completion, and CT scan interpretation. IV thrombolysis occurred twice as often in the prenotification group.
BACKGROUND: Prenotification to hospitals by emergency medical services of patients with suspected stroke is recommended to reduce delays in time-dependent therapies. We hypothesized that hospital prenotification would reduce recommended stroke time targets. METHODS: We used the Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital (RWJUH) Brain Attack Database, which includes demographic and clinical data on all emergency department (ED) patients alerted as a Brain Attack between January 1, 2009 and June 30, 2010. Outcome variables included the time from door to stroke team arrival, computed tomographic (CT) scan completion, CT scan interpretation, electrocardiogram, laboratory results, treatment decision, and intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration. The primary independent variable was brain attack activation before arrival to the emergency department (ED; prenotification) versus on or after ED arrival (no prenotification). Analysis of covariance was used with patient predictors as covariates in addition to the one of interest (prenotification vs no prenotification). P ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were 229 patients (114 prenotification and 115 no prenotification) alerted as having a brain attack within the study period. Patients with prehospital notification were older (69.5 years vs 61.5 years; P = .0002), had more severe strokes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 11.1 vs 6.9; P < .0001), and received IV tPA twice as often (27% vs 15%; P = .024). Prenotification resulted in a significant reduction in all stroke time targets except door to treatment decision and tPA administration. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital notification of suspected strokepatients reduces time to stroke team arrival, CT scan completion, and CT scan interpretation. IV thrombolysis occurred twice as often in the prenotification group.
Authors: Prasanthi Govindarajan; Benjamin T Friedman; James Q Delgadillo; David Ghilarducci; Lawrence J Cook; Barbara Grimes; Charles E McCulloch; S Claiborne Johnston Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Shreyansh Shah; Marie Luby; Karen Poole; Teresa Morella; Elizabeth Keller; Richard T Benson; John K Lynch; Zurab Nadareishvili; Amie W Hsia Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: David Curfman; Lisa Tabor Connor; Hawnwan Philip Moy; Laura Heitsch; Peter Panagos; Jin-Moo Lee; David K Tan; Andria L Ford Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-03-18 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Barbara Casolla; Marie Bodenant; Marie Girot; Charlotte Cordonnier; Jean-Pierre Pruvo; Eric Wiel; Didier Leys; Patrick Goldstein Journal: J Neurol Date: 2012-10-10 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Melissa S Eng; Anand V Patel; Richard B Libman; Paul Wright; Jeffrey M Katz Journal: Curr Atheroscler Rep Date: 2017-10-24 Impact factor: 5.113
Authors: Tzu-Ching Wu; Claude Nguyen; Christy Ankrom; Julian Yang; David Persse; Farhaan Vahidy; James C Grotta; Sean I Savitz Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 7.914