Tzu-Ching Wu1, Claude Nguyen2, Christy Ankrom2, Julian Yang2, David Persse2, Farhaan Vahidy2, James C Grotta2, Sean I Savitz2. 1. From the Department of Neurology, University of Texas-Health Science Center at Houston (T.-C.W., C.N., C.A., F.V., J.C.G., S.I.S.); Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (J.Y.); and Department of Medicine (D.P.) and Department of Surgery (D.P.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. tzu-ching.wu@uth.tmc.edu. 2. From the Department of Neurology, University of Texas-Health Science Center at Houston (T.-C.W., C.N., C.A., F.V., J.C.G., S.I.S.); Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (J.Y.); and Department of Medicine (D.P.) and Department of Surgery (D.P.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prehospital evaluation using telemedicine may accelerate acute stroke treatment with tissue-type plasminogen activator. We explored the feasibility and reliability of using telemedicine in the field and ambulance to help evaluate acute stroke patients. METHODS: Ten unique, scripted stroke scenarios, each conducted 4 times, were portrayed by trained actors retrieved and transported by Houston Fire Department emergency medical technicians to our stroke center. The vascular neurologists performed remote assessments in real time, obtaining clinical data points and National Institutes of Health (NIH) Stroke Scale, using the In-Touch RP-Xpress telemedicine device. Each scripted scenario was recorded for a subsequent evaluation by a second blinded vascular neurologist. Study feasibility was defined by the ability to conduct 80% of the sessions without major technological limitations. Reliability of video interpretation was defined by a 90% concordance between the data derived during the real-time sessions and those from the scripted scenarios. RESULTS: In 34 of 40 (85%) scenarios, the teleconsultation was conducted without major technical complication. The absolute agreement for intraclass correlation was 0.997 (95% confidence interval, 0.992-0.999) for the NIH Stroke Scale obtained during the real-time sessions and 0.993 (95% confidence interval, 0.975-0.999) for the recorded sessions. Inter-rater agreement using κ-statistics showed that for live-raters, 10 of 15 items on the NIH Stroke Scale showed excellent agreement and 5 of 15 showed moderate agreement. Matching of real-time assessments occurred for 88% (30/34) of NIH Stroke Scale scores by ±2 points and 96% of the clinical information. CONCLUSIONS: Mobile telemedicine is reliable and feasible in assessing actors simulating acute stroke in the prehospital setting.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prehospital evaluation using telemedicine may accelerate acute stroke treatment with tissue-type plasminogen activator. We explored the feasibility and reliability of using telemedicine in the field and ambulance to help evaluate acute strokepatients. METHODS: Ten unique, scripted stroke scenarios, each conducted 4 times, were portrayed by trained actors retrieved and transported by Houston Fire Department emergency medical technicians to our stroke center. The vascular neurologists performed remote assessments in real time, obtaining clinical data points and National Institutes of Health (NIH) Stroke Scale, using the In-Touch RP-Xpress telemedicine device. Each scripted scenario was recorded for a subsequent evaluation by a second blinded vascular neurologist. Study feasibility was defined by the ability to conduct 80% of the sessions without major technological limitations. Reliability of video interpretation was defined by a 90% concordance between the data derived during the real-time sessions and those from the scripted scenarios. RESULTS: In 34 of 40 (85%) scenarios, the teleconsultation was conducted without major technical complication. The absolute agreement for intraclass correlation was 0.997 (95% confidence interval, 0.992-0.999) for the NIH Stroke Scale obtained during the real-time sessions and 0.993 (95% confidence interval, 0.975-0.999) for the recorded sessions. Inter-rater agreement using κ-statistics showed that for live-raters, 10 of 15 items on the NIH Stroke Scale showed excellent agreement and 5 of 15 showed moderate agreement. Matching of real-time assessments occurred for 88% (30/34) of NIH Stroke Scale scores by ±2 points and 96% of the clinical information. CONCLUSIONS: Mobile telemedicine is reliable and feasible in assessing actors simulating acute stroke in the prehospital setting.
Authors: Gregg C Fonarow; Eric E Smith; Jeffrey L Saver; Mathew J Reeves; Deepak L Bhatt; Maria V Grau-Sepulveda; DaiWai M Olson; Adrian F Hernandez; Eric D Peterson; Lee H Schwamm Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Thomas G Liman; Benjamin Winter; Carolin Waldschmidt; Norman Zerbe; Peter Hufnagl; Heinrich J Audebert; Matthias Endres Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Werner Hacke; Markku Kaste; Erich Bluhmki; Miroslav Brozman; Antoni Dávalos; Donata Guidetti; Vincent Larrue; Kennedy R Lees; Zakaria Medeghri; Thomas Machnig; Dietmar Schneider; Rüdiger von Kummer; Nils Wahlgren; Danilo Toni Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-09-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Amrou Sarraj; Sarah Medrek; Karen Albright; Sheryl Martin-Schild; Wafi Bibars; Farhaan Vahidy; James C Grotta; Sean I Savitz Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: Robbert-Jan Van Hooff; Ann De Smedt; Sylvie De Raedt; Maarten Moens; Peter Mariën; Philippe Paquier; Jacques De Keyser; Raf Brouns Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: M P LaMonte; J Cullen; D M Gagliano; R Gunawardane; P Hu; C Mackenzie; Y Xiao Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2000 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Werner Hacke; Geoffrey Donnan; Cesare Fieschi; Markku Kaste; Rüdiger von Kummer; Joseph P Broderick; Thomas Brott; Michael Frankel; James C Grotta; E Clarke Haley; Thomas Kwiatkowski; Steven R Levine; Chris Lewandowski; Mei Lu; Patrick Lyden; John R Marler; Suresh Patel; Barbara C Tilley; Gregory Albers; Erich Bluhmki; Manfred Wilhelm; Scott Hamilton Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-03-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Marian P LaMonte; Yan Xiao; Peter F Hu; David M Gagliano; Mona N Bahouth; Ruwani D Gunawardane; Colin F MacKenzie; Wade R Gaasch; James Cullen Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2004 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Jason M Lippman; Sherita N Chapman Smith; Timothy L McMurry; Zachary G Sutton; Brian S Gunnell; Jack Cote; Debra G Perina; David C Cattell-Gordon; Karen S Rheuban; Nina J Solenski; Bradford B Worrall; Andrew M Southerland Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Rebecca L Gunter; Skyler Chouinard; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Jason T Wiseman; Sam Clarkson; Kyla Bennett; Caprice C Greenberg; K Craig Kent Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2016-02-13 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Sherita N Chapman Smith; Prasanthi Govindarajan; Matthew M Padrick; Jason M Lippman; Timothy L McMurry; Brian L Resler; Kevin Keenan; Brian S Gunnell; Prachi Mehndiratta; Christina Y Chee; Elizabeth A Cahill; Cameron Dietiker; David C Cattell-Gordon; Wade S Smith; Debra G Perina; Nina J Solenski; Bradford B Worrall; Andrew M Southerland Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Sherita N Chapman Smith; Pamela C Brown; Kaitlynne H Waits; Jason S Wong; Muhammad S Bhatti; Qaiser Toqeer; Jamie V Ricks; Michelle L Stockner; Tsion Habtamu; Joshnamaithili Seelam; Rashon C Britt; Jacob M Giovia; Baaba K Blankson; Poanna Bennam; Mirinda A Gormley; Juan Lu; Joseph P Ornato Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 3.536